Recommended Posts

My wife really wants a mac laptop now for school, as she just enjoys the platform over Windows, including 7. My question to you guys is which would be better at this point, is the case that much nicer?

Macbook 4GB - 1039

MacBook Pro 4GB - 1099

Other than the case, I don't see a reason to go with the Pro model? Those prices are with student discount also, FYI

is it really worth the extra 60 to go Pro?

And yes, I've told her that there are less expensive laptops on the market, but she refuses to own anything else at this point.

I suppose the MBP has the SD card slot too.

Well you're just comparing the names of the model and the amount of RAM. What about the CPU speed, screen size, GPU, etc?

If the Macbook at $1039 is maxed out spec wise, but the Macbook Pro at $1099 is the lowest model available, then maybe you'd be better off getting the Macbook.

In any case, chances are if the difference in price is only that much then the Pro is the way to go.

  • 2 weeks later...

I know many people would strongly disagree with me, but personally I wouldn't buy a MBP even if I had $1,000,000 to burn. I was assigned a 17" MBP at work to create an iPhone app, and I tried for 3 weeks to like it enough to make it my primary notebook, but in the end I went back to my HP. Mac OS X looks pretty, but really ended up being annoying to me (lacking in window management, UI inconsistencies, stability issues - yes, I've had more trouble with my MBP with Snow Leopard than my HP with Windows 7).

I know many people would strongly disagree with me, but personally I wouldn't buy a MBP even if I had $1,000,000 to burn. I was assigned a 17" MBP at work to create an iPhone app, and I tried for 3 weeks to like it enough to make it my primary notebook, but in the end I went back to my HP. Mac OS X looks pretty, but really ended up being annoying to me (lacking in window management, UI inconsistencies, stability issues - yes, I've had more trouble with my MBP with Snow Leopard than my HP with Windows 7).

I think that's simply a case of

1. Being far too accustomed of Windows to the point of expecting OS X to be the same as it

and

2. Not being helped by someone who actually uses OS X day in and day out, and is familiar with the interface (not just "barely using it")

As someone who went from being fluent in Windows to fluent in OS X, I don't think OS X is lacking in anything at all. Things are simply not as "up in your face" as it is in Windows. But hey, to each their own. OS X is not for everyone, and if you're happier with Windows then that's great for you (so long as you don't spread false info to justify why you don't like OS X like some people do).

No, you shouldn't. I bought one apple iphone 4 factory unlocked phone from http://www.topincart.com/new-apple-iphone-4-black-16gb-factory-unlocked-mc603zpa-gsm-cellul-p-490.html in competitive price. It is unlocked ,it can work in any sim card. the function is so powerful.It bring me a lot of fun and convenient,i like it very much. you also can buy one from there.

:spam:

I'm a Computer Science and Engineering Major at school, who has a 13" Macbook Pro (Mid '09 version). I personally love it. The battery is phenomenal, and I don't have to worry about carrying my charger around with my constantly (or even hunting down the nearest outlet, which can be quite a challenge in some older buildings). I never used OSX before the move, but after only a year of owning this computer, I've decided I'll never own another non Apple computer again. (Actually saving up to buy a Mac Mini). I also feel safer carrying an Aluminum computer in my bookbag, as compared to a plastic one.

Good luck at school!

I think that's simply a case of

1. Being far too accustomed of Windows to the point of expecting OS X to be the same as it

and

2. Not being helped by someone who actually uses OS X day in and day out, and is familiar with the interface (not just "barely using it")

As someone who went from being fluent in Windows to fluent in OS X, I don't think OS X is lacking in anything at all. Things are simply not as "up in your face" as it is in Windows. But hey, to each their own. OS X is not for everyone, and if you're happier with Windows then that's great for you (so long as you don't spread false info to justify why you don't like OS X like some people do).

I've used OS X and Windows 7 daily (OS X at school and Windows 7 at home), and I know very well what he was complaining about.

UI Inconsistencies - When you close a window, the context menu for it still remains at the top, even though it's relating to nothing at all. That's my major annoyance in that category.

Window Management - If you have three Firefox windows open, the only way to switch through them is to right click the icon on the dock, or use the Expose thingy. Alt+Tab just switches between applications, not windows in applications I believe.

Stability Issues - Beach ball. Nuff said. OS X and Windows both have their stability issues.

Windows 7 is a cleaner, more refined operating system than OS X. If you have 5 windows behind a maximized window, you KNOW that by simply looking at your taskbar, you can SEE what you have open. With OS X, only your minimized windows show on the dock. Switching between open windows is then again a pain to do. It gets in the way of your work flow. And then you close all your windows, and you're staring at your desktop, but the context menu is still showing the iMovie options?? You have to click once again to get to the desktop. Inefficient and confusing to the end user.

Does OS X really have that many issues?

I was always under the impression it was very clean and gave good work flow as people usually say they are more productive on OS X.

The only time I've used OS X is in PC World messing around on them...

I've used OS X and Windows 7 daily (OS X at school and Windows 7 at home), and I know very well what he was complaining about.

UI Inconsistencies - When you close a window, the context menu for it still remains at the top, even though it's relating to nothing at all. That's my major annoyance in that category.

Again, you don't really seem to understand the OS X philosophy. I took an Apple development course at my college and we went through books of documentation (written by Apple, no less) regarding this kind of stuff. All of these "inconsistencies" you note are done on purpose, and again prove to me that you're just expecting everything to work as Windows does.

The contextual menu at the top remains as "Firefox" even after you've closed all the open windows, for example, because the menu is operating at an application level, and the window you just closed was operating at a window level. Notice how when you close System Preferences it disappears from the menu bar and the dock all at once? Because it's not a window based application, meaning, you can't have more than one instance of it open. I forgot the term used for that kind of application now but there is a name for it.

Window based applications are like Firefox or TextEdit where you can technically have more than one instance of a window belonging to that application open at a given moment, so if you've closed all instances of TextEdit, you can press CMD+N to open a new one. In Windows, you close all Notepad windows and now you have to go to the start bar -> run -> notepad just to get one going again.

It's done by design and yes, it works better for those who understand it and embrace it.

Window Management - If you have three Firefox windows open, the only way to switch through them is to right click the icon on the dock, or use the Expose thingy. Alt+Tab just switches between applications, not windows in applications I believe.

This is where I blow your mind. Next time, try using CMD+~. Boom.

Stability Issues - Beach ball. Nuff said. OS X and Windows both have their stability issues.

Windows 7 is a cleaner, more refined operating system than OS X. If you have 5 windows behind a maximized window, you KNOW that by simply looking at your taskbar, you can SEE what you have open. With OS X, only your minimized windows show on the dock. Switching between open windows is then again a pain to do. It gets in the way of your work flow. And then you close all your windows, and you're staring at your desktop, but the context menu is still showing the iMovie options?? You have to click once again to get to the desktop. Inefficient and confusing to the end user.

Again, to each their own.

I disagree with everything you said there but I'm not going to argue with you about it because you expect something specific from your computer and I expect something different. That's why the choice of Windows or Mac exists in the first place. ;)

I disagree with everything you said there but I'm not going to argue with you about it because you expect something specific from your computer and I expect something different. That's why the choice of Windows or Mac exists in the first place. ;)

So we disagree, what a surprise hah. That's basically the resolution of each of these arguments. Good waste of time though.

So we disagree, what a surprise hah. That's basically the resolution of each of these arguments. Good waste of time though.

Well I explained my reasoning in my post, so at least you know why I disagree. If you think agreeing to disagree is a waste of time, then would you prefer to get into a pointless flame war over something that neither of us are going to change our minds on? ;)

If you try out OSX thinking it will work like Windows you'll run into a wall pretty quickly... The way things work is different and if you learn to embrace it it will work pretty good (just like when you're used to the way things work in Windows you can get it going pretty good too)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!