Recommended Posts

The client doesn't report the proper download speeds. I was pretty much maxing out my mere 10mbit/sec(1.25mbyte/sec) connection the whole time and it never said more than 400KB/sec. So yea, use some kinda app to see what speed you're really getting.

I saw the same, 90KB yet my Resource Monitor was showing the gw2 process to be using 300KB.

So for those of us that are in.. What server do we want to play on? (US Worlds)

Anvil Rock? First on the list and most likely to be fully populated at all times. Though I don't think that will be a problem with any of the servers.

Although I'm not sure how much I will personally play, I think I'll just test out the different classes and confirm which class I'll be picking as my main once the game goes live. And trying out pvp.

I haven't seen any info on it yet but are they letting us make Sylvari and Asura? I know those two races were not available in previous betas.

Anvil Rock? First on the list and most likely to be fully populated at all times. Though I don't think that will be a problem with any of the servers.

Sounds good, my worry is queues. Is there going to be districts like GW1?

SK[' timestamp=1335355820' post='594822939]

Queuing in GW2 is different. If your server is full you get directed to an overflow server. When a slot becomes available your given the choice to go to your home server.

That's not bad, but still I wouldn't want to have to be in some random server waiting to get into mine, although it is better than a:

"You are current 18th in line... 17th... 12th... 5... 1.. 1... 1... 1... "

So for those of us that are in.. What server do we want to play on? (US Worlds)

I was thinking henge of denravi myself. Just cause i liked that quiet little town in gw1.

I haven't seen any info on it yet but are they letting us make Sylvari and Asura? I know those two races were not available in previous betas.

Nope, not yet. And there's a good chance they might not appear in any BWE. Cause they don't want to spoil everything before release.

SK[' timestamp=1335355820' post='594822939]

Queuing in GW2 is different. If your server is full you get directed to an overflow server. When a slot becomes available your given the choice to go to your home server.

You also keep any progress you made at the overflow server upon returning to your home server.

Why did they put both of those names in the EU? :rofl:

Because we're awesome! :rofl: Think we got the better Server names than you guys in NA did, they should have given you Fissure of Woe or something to split them up. :laugh:

They're going to be full population at all times for sure.

Because we're awesome! :rofl: Think we got the better Server names than you guys in NA did, they should have given you Fissure of Woe or something to split them up. :laugh:

They're going to be full population at all times for sure.

You guys also get Ring of Fire, Desolation, and Abbadons Mouth.

I demand a recount.

You guys also get Ring of Fire, Desolation, and Abbadons Mouth.

I demand a recount.

Denied! :rofl: You get... Yak's Bend and... Ferguson's Crossing and... Blazeridge Mountains, actually that last one is pretty good :) not to mention Sorrow's Furnace! :woot:

i doubt that i will be in the beta however, i can hope.

I will not be buying the game when it is released however, a bit later this year i might be able to pick it up. the game looks simply amazing.

i doubt that i will be in the beta however, i can hope.

I will not be buying the game when it is released however, a bit later this year i might be able to pick it up. the game looks simply amazing.

With D3 and GW2 I am going to be swamped. Why you planning on waiting?

So it seems they've stopped taking digital prepurchases at the moment. I guess that means they've gotten enough prepurchases already to fill up, or mostly fill up, all of the 48 servers available for this weekend. Otherwise this wouldn't have happened. Impressive to have gotten so much so quickly.

So it seems they've stopped taking digital prepurchases at the moment. I guess that means they've gotten enough prepurchases already to fill up, or mostly fill up, all of the 48 servers available for this weekend. Otherwise this wouldn't have happened. Impressive to have gotten so much so quickly.

They do say sold out, that's funny.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
    • not yet, because at the moment it is not a threat to MS, if and I mean if it did become a threat to MS Office, then it may be a different thing. MS don't like competition
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!