Consumer/Webmaster Alert: $200 CMS/eCommerce Suite w/ Hidden CSS Links


Recommended Posts

Hello All,

I was checking the Google Webmaster Central Help Forums, just as I do every day, for SEO related postings when I came across a post concerning the Content Management System / eCommerce Suites of Kryptronic, Inc. Upon reading, I was sickened by the fact that a company that has been around so long and charges so much for its software would include a black-hat SEO tactic that can get sites that pay to use its software penalized or even banned from Google.

Basically, Kryptronic, Inc. is charging a lot for software that includes free advertising in the form of hidden one-way links (hidden by .hidden{display:none;} CSS) home without their clients realizing it. Kryptronic, Inc. gets lots of money for their software and free backlinks to boost their SERP rankings, and customers are automatically left in violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines and left at risk of being reprimanded by either punishment or total delisting.

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66353

Here is a list of victims - view the source codes of these web sites.

https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http://www.kryptronic.com/Content-Management-System/&fr=sfp&bwm=i

SOURCE: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=0834ed8c6ca81bce&hl=en

This seems very much equivalent to paying to have your house painted, and then having the painters without your knowledge paint an advertisement for their company on top of your roof. You may not be on your roof for years, only to eventually discover the advertisement that all planes flying overhead for years got to see - that you weren't compensated for. Kryptronic, Inc. is getting tons of FREE one-way, high PageRank links - which normally cost a lot.

The Google posting specifies that nearly 4000 sites are using this bogus software but it's probably more.

Neowin.net should do some investigative reporting on this story, IMO. Thousands but potentially tens of thousands of web sites and clients of Kryptronic, Inc. are at risk of having their web sites banned. This is front-page news!

Yes that's a bit dishonest, to hide link. I don't think Google will sanction the customers. Because there are case when text can be hidden in a legitimate way with css. It's not very clear how google react to spam hidden with css. Myself, I'm distributing a php script for free, and I've resisted to the temptation to hide a link with css. The link is clear & obvious ;).

It's not very clear how google react to spam hidden with css.

Thank you for your response!

With all due respect, I disagree with your statement. In my opinion, it is pretty clear how Google reacts to hidden spam within the pages it indexes.

If you read the Google Webmaster Guidelines, specifically the section pertaining to Hidden Text and Links, you'll see that Google's position on the matter is pretty clear. I've been practicing SEO for years and plenty of web sites get penalized or even removed 100% from Google's index regularly for these types of practices.

You'll notice that the first option reads "Hidden text or links" on the Google Spam Report Form. They take this kind of thing very, very seriously.

Also, even though the sites using this software are innocent and simply ignorant, Google tends to treat the matter similar to how cops treat seatbelt tickets. If a passenger doesn't have their seatbelt on, the driver gets the ticket. Why? Because it's the driver's responsibility to ensure that their passengers have their seatbelts on. If a site owner is unaware that their site is, say, distributing malware or practicing black-hat SEO, ignorance doesn't provide an exemption from the laws that govern Google. The site owner is still considered at fault because they control what Googlebot sees, i.e. the contents of their website.

In certain cases, such as this, if it is brought to Google's attention that the sites using this software are in fact innocent victims and that this black-hat code was slipped in without anyone's knowledge, only Kryptronic would be punished. However, the victims really should switch to something like Drupal, anyway, that is more widely supported and... free. It's good enough for WhiteHouse.gov, right?

hi

If you read the Google Webmaster Guidelines, specifically the section pertaining to Hidden Text and Links, you'll see that Google's position on the matter is pretty clear. I've been practicing SEO for years and plenty of web sites get penalized or even removed 100% from Google's index regularly for these types of practices.

The question is that if a website rely only on SEO black technique to get a ranking , or if it is has a value in itself. Also for a lot of website , getting traffic doesn't depend only on Google ranking.

I've searched the issue about text hidden by CSS, and found an article from 2005 , quoting Google:

We can flag text that appears to be hidden using CSS at Google. To date we have not algorithmically removed sites for doing that.

http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200510/google_seo_and_using_css_to_hide_text/

I think algorithms used by Google are more and more evolved, and at at the same time there's more and more spam. Google don't have time to punish, every "minor cases".

However, the victims really should switch to something like Drupal, anyway, that is more widely supported and... free.

I would have mentioned Joomla first, but I guess both are good in a different way.

The question is that if a website rely only on SEO black technique to get a ranking , or if it is has a value in itself. Also for a lot of website , getting traffic doesn't depend only on Google ranking.

Kryptronic has virtually no natural links. They're all the result of spam or these hidden links that they've embedded within their software. In this case, the only reason this company is getting any traffic is search manipulation. It spammed to get initial sales and each sale has been giving it free inks. Without these tactics, it would not have a PageRank of 6. Yes, it's traffic doesn't merely depend upon Google, as there are other engines, such as Bing and Ask.com, but companies like this primarily receive traffic from search.

I've searched the issue about text hidden by CSS, and found an article from 2005 , quoting Google:

http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200510/google_seo_and_using_css_to_hide_text/

Google makes around 500 changes to its algorithm and plenty of changes to its policies yearly. A blog post from 2005 isn't a very good citation considering 2011 is rapidly approaching. Also, this post is primarily talking about hiding text, NOT hiding one-way outbound links for the purpose of increasing the PageRank of a third-party web site. Hiding text and such is generally only a punishable offense if the text is obvious keyword stuffing or some other SEO tactic and has no benefit to users. Hiding outbound links that will never be seen by anything other than search engines isn't at all OK. This is a punishable offense.

I think algorithms used by Google are more and more evolved, and at at the same time there's more and more spam. Google don't have time to punish, every "minor cases".

This isn't a minor case. Thousands of web sites are at risk of getting penalized for using Kryptronic software as they're in violation of Google's "Hidden Text and Links" policy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!