Connecting a Third Monitor


Recommended Posts

Also I would like to watch some vids on Youtube in 1080p.What's the requirement for 1080p anyways? My video card has 256MB, so if I get another one that's like 1GB wouldn't that help?

For Flash h.264 acceleration (Youtube HD), you will need to get a GeForce 8 series or ATI HD 4000 series or greater card.

You will want to look into an ATI Eyefinity card with three ports as that should let you use triple monitors with ease. I've heard Nvidia has triple monitor support planned for their Fermi cards as well, but I haven't looked at their new cards recently.

This was true for PCI video cards working with AGP video cards, this is not true for PCIe cards

Well apparently PCI-E/PCI combos do exist.

http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6282092&postcount=8

Wow a lot of different answers here. So I'm guessing I need an identical card in order to run 3 monitors?

Also Mr Candyman said I need 3 identical cards to run SLI, but homeboy rocketshoulders said I only need 2 to run SLI. So is it 2 or 3?

But anyways whats the big difference between running SLI and not running SLI?

Thanks

Running 2 in SLI will not allow you to run 3 monitors. it will only use the outputs from the primary card. Running 2 non-SLI will allow you to use the output (I'm not sure if it will alllow both on the second card or just one) from the second card. If you run 3 of the same card in SLI it will allow you to use the primary output from each of the cards.

See my previous post about what is probably a much better solution for you

Thanks.

The pic you showed me, that is ram slots... I am talking about the slots where your current video card is at. You can put another card and place it under your current video card.

Understand what I am saying?

How much ram you have? I am not talking out that comes from your video card. If you have 1 gb ram or less, then you might need to upgrade to about 4gb or higher ram so it might work that you can run 1080p movies smoothly... see if it helps.

You don't have to get the identical, you can get same brand or different brand... mine has different brands on it... no plm.

I have no idea how much you pay for... it's up to you to get a video card of your choice depends on how much you want to pay for and what you use it for... Like I said before, if you want to run 1080p movies, you will need to upgrade some parts or whole system.

Oh sorry, here's another picture: http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/fullimage.php?image=9245

I'm using the blue slot right now for my card. The black on the left is still free

I have 3GB of ram.

Ok so if I don't need identical, can you recommend one that will work smoothly with mine?

I don't do a lot of gaming on my pc. Just watch movies, audio/video editing and surf.

But exactly do I need to upgrade for 1080p? More RAM?

Thanks

I don't do a lot of gaming on my pc. Just watch movies, audio/video editing and surf.

But exactly do I need to upgrade for 1080p? More RAM?

Thanks

I already answered. Scroll up

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935644-connecting-a-third-monitor/page__st__15__p__593115092entry593115092

Yea I was still typing that reply when you posted it.

So are you suggesting that I replace my video card with GeForce 8 series, ATI HD 4000 series or ATI Eyefinity card, or are you telling me that these cards can work with my XFX 7800GT?

you guys are really confusing him.

imho OP, just get a single HD5000 series eye finity card, any necessary adapters and take out the old 7800.

can you tell me your other system specs and if you play games or not?

No, I don't really play games on my PC. Usually just watch movies, that's why I want to watch it in 1080p.

So this single ATI Eyefinity will allow me to connect 3 monitors and watch 1080p stuff?

Thanks

No, I don't really play games on my PC. Usually just watch movies, that's why I want to watch it in 1080p.

So this single ATI Eyefinity will allow me to connect 3 monitors and watch 1080p stuff?

Thanks

http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102870&cm_re=eyefinity-_-14-102-870-_-Product

and see if any of your monitors will accept display port connectors.

if not(which is likely) you will need a display port to dvi adapter for 2 of your monitors.

http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812270280&cm_re=display_port_dvi-_-12-270-280-_-Product

http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102870&cm_re=eyefinity-_-14-102-870-_-Product

and see if any of your monitors will accept display port connectors.

if not(which is likely) you will need a display port to dvi adapter for 2 of your monitors.

http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812270280&cm_re=display_port_dvi-_-12-270-280-_-Product

Ok wait, is PCI-E and PCI-E 2.0 the same thing? I think mine might just be the first version, not 2.0.

Also, I'm thinking about this one: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=5599121&CatId=3585

Because I kind of want the full 1GB memory. Do you think this card is good? Or is there another one with 1GB thats better/cheaper?

Also, the one I linked has 4 outputs right? By the way, are these outputs going to be cloned? Or is all 4 going to be independent?

Kloud77, if you were wanting to do it on the cheap, seriously consider http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500164

Since you already have an Nvidia card and you do not game as you already have said and you just want to watch movies, that card would be perfect for you. I can say I am impressed with the Nvidia ION chipset that is in my testbed computer.

Ok wait, is PCI-E and PCI-E 2.0 the same thing? I think mine might just be the first version, not 2.0.

Also, I'm thinking about this one: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=5599121&CatId=3585

Because I kind of want the full 1GB memory. Do you think this card is good? Or is there another one with 1GB thats better/cheaper?

Also, the one I linked has 4 outputs right? By the way, are these outputs going to be cloned? Or is all 4 going to be independent?

pcie 2.0 is backward compatable, ie you can use a pcie 2.0 card ona pcie 1.1 or 1.0 slot. so no worries here.

well i picked the one i linked because you don'tplay games, but if you want teh specific connectors on this one(2 dvi and a hdmi) it might save you some cash on adapters. kinda. a little less fuss when hooking it up perhaps?

no the outputs will not be cloned, they will each have thier own desktop so to say in windows. you can watch a movie on one screen and browse on a second and msn on third if you want.

Kloud77, if you were wanting to do it on the cheap, seriously consider http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500164

Since you already have an Nvidia card and you do not game as you already have said and you just want to watch movies, that card would be perfect for you. I can say I am impressed with the Nvidia ION chipset that is in my testbed computer.

But TokiToki said that my video card can't watch 1080p. That's why I'm considering just replacing my current video card. So will adding this ZOTAC ION-GPU-A-E allow me to watch 1080p?

By the way, treemonster, the Sapphire card that you linked me, does that support 1080p? Or did you suggest that for the triple monitor support?

nope getting a non identical video card you will have to choose video output of one or the other.

believe me i have 2 non identical video cards in my system currently, and putting the video in the lower version one produces no video, though it detects the monitor.

ati cards are a little different though. but for nvidia they have to be the same model.

Maybe I miss understood you here...so IF I have two nvidia cards lets say a GTX 295 and a 8800GT and I have one monitor directly connected to the GTX 295 and another monitor directly connected to the 8800GT your saying this should not work?

Wow, this is crazy. I've been running 3 monitors for almost 8 years now. You can have two non-identical video cards. If they are two different connections, say, one PCI-E and one PCI, then a setting in the bios will allow choosing which is 'Primary'. However, if they are both in PCI-E slots (that's how I run them myself) then the primary will be the lowest numbered slot. Once booted into Windows you can choose which is your Primary monitor after that anyway.

I do actually have two identical cards in this build that are SLI'd together. But I ran non-identicals for several years as well. When I turn on SLI, it does disable my two side monitors, as all the brain power of that second video card is used to enhance the capabilities of the primary monitor. I used to do that for games, but turns out all the games I play run just fine without SLI in the first place... lol

Wow, this is crazy. I've been running 3 monitors for almost 8 years now. You can have two non-identical video cards. If they are two different connections, say, one PCI-E and one PCI, then a setting in the bios will allow choosing which is 'Primary'. However, if they are both in PCI-E slots (that's how I run them myself) then the primary will be the lowest numbered slot. Once booted into Windows you can choose which is your Primary monitor after that anyway.

I do actually have two identical cards in this build that are SLI'd together. But I ran non-identicals for several years as well. When I turn on SLI, it does disable my two side monitors, as all the brain power of that second video card is used to enhance the capabilities of the primary monitor. I used to do that for games, but turns out all the games I play run just fine without SLI in the first place... lol

Yea, I'm not even considering finding an identical or non-identical any more. Too many conflicting answers and too confusing for me. This method also doesn't allow me to watch 1080p.

Now I just want to replace my current video card, so that I can watch 1080p and support 3 monitors. I think that's my best option. Not the cheapest but since I want 1080p I think its my only option.

Well, you don't need more then one video card to run 1080p. Just obviously not a crappy old card.

But if you want three monitors, you will need two cards. Who said they have to be expensive? I run these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161314 Only takes one to do 1080p video playback.

Edit: Oops, not that exact one. I have the model with two DVIs, not a DVI and a D-SUB. But you get the idea.

But TokiToki said that my video card can't watch 1080p. That's why I'm considering just replacing my current video card. So will adding this ZOTAC ION-GPU-A-E allow me to watch 1080p?

By the way, treemonster, the Sapphire card that you linked me, does that support 1080p? Or did you suggest that for the triple monitor support?

it's best suited to video playback. yeah it should be able to play back blu rays at 1080p if you want them too. flash h264 or w/e else you want.

Maybe I miss understood you here...so IF I have two nvidia cards lets say a GTX 295 and a 8800GT and I have one monitor directly connected to the GTX 295 and another monitor directly connected to the 8800GT your saying this should not work?

well basically what i'm going on here is i have a 480 and a 8800 gts 512 in my rig, and i accidentally hooked up my monitor to my 8800 and then booted. there was no video, the first time around when i first installed the 480.

later when i bought a new monitor i accidentally hooked it up to the 8800 again trying to use plug an play while the pc was running, and heard the windows detecting new hardware sound, but no video. then again at this point i had reboot even with it connected to my 480.

i'm not an expert here, but this was my experience.

i've always been under the impression with nvidia you had to have identical cards for this kind of set up anyway, but hey maybe i'm wrong, and there's a way to do it with different pcie cards. as per the post above for example.

Well, you don't need more then one video card to run 1080p. Just obviously not a crappy old card.

But if you want three monitors, you will need two cards. Who said they have to be expensive? I run these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161314 Only takes one to do 1080p video playback.

Edit: Oops, not that exact one. I have the model with two DVIs, not a DVI and a D-SUB. But you get the idea.

the 5670(?) i linked him as well as the 5770 he linked, are all designed to out put to 3 monitors with a single card. that's what eyefinity does.

Well, you don't need more then one video card to run 1080p. Just obviously not a crappy old card.

But if you want three monitors, you will need two cards. Who said they have to be expensive? I run these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161314 Only takes one to do 1080p video playback.

Edit: Oops, not that exact one. I have the model with two DVIs, not a DVI and a D-SUB. But you get the idea.

So you're suggesting I get 2 of those? I think it'll be better if I just get 1 eyefinity card, right?

So I guess it's decided, I'll be picking up a single eyefinity card to replace my xfx geforce 7800.

I should also mention my CPU. It's the Athlon 64 3700+ 939. Will that affect the 1080p playback or am I good?

I think it'll be better if I just get 1 eyefinity card, right?

Yes as we don't know if you have another x16 PCI-e slot to have two cards.

So a card with two DVI ports with a DisplayPort like thats one:

http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/?psn=000101&pid=289

with a DisplayPort to DVI Cable.

http://www.byteccusa.com/product/adapter/AP-DPDVI-005/AP-DPDVI-005.htm

To give you three DVI monitors.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!