iPhone screen protector


Recommended Posts

So i've been googling my way into what brand of screen protector to buy and i've narrowed it down to this:

1. BSE, best whole body protection, yet yellow peel effect. ( though you have to make your own soapy solution)

2. Body guardz, hard to apply, not so much yellow peel.

3. invisishiled, apparently begins to peel around the edges.

Anyway, though i'd ask, which brand have you used, had any problems with eg. like lint accumulating, edges peeling off, etc.

*It has to be a whole body, not just screen protector.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/936164-iphone-screen-protector/
Share on other sites

I have been using invisible shield for years now actually, even have it on my iphone, mac book pro and my magic mouse and magic trackpad and ipad.

I have bought so much that I am a zagg zealot ROFL.

That being said they are not without error at times. I have found some that seemed to look a little weird after applied but most were 100% great.

I dont understand why people think zagg is so bad because, heck, what other company will replace ones that have issues for free, for life.

If it peels off (usually after a LOT of use and going in and out of pocket etc), just get a replacement then send the old one back (the shield you peeled off) and its free.

My invisible shield on my X10 is sticking perfectly around the edges, no sign of peeling. while I was a bit worried about the orange skin surface, when you use it and don't look at an angle it's not noticeable. and unlike the smooth ones, you don't get finger smudges, and after a week when it's dried out, it also doesn't feel "sticky" unlike most bare screens or smooth screen protectors.

so yeah , I would have no problem recommending invisible shield.

Have you looked into SGP Incredible Shields? Not really used those particular full body kits, but I do know that the SGP front screen protectors are pretty good quality.

I dont understand why people think zagg is so bad because, heck, what other company will replace ones that have issues for free, for life.

If it peels off (usually after a LOT of use and going in and out of pocket etc), just get a replacement then send the old one back (the shield you peeled off) and its free.

My experience with the InvisibleShield on my iPhone 4 was that it started to peel off within 2 weeks. Eventually it'll get stuck to something in your pocket and peel off more. This has happened not only to me, but also 4 of my friends with the same phone and Zagg product.

It could be argued that other companies may not need to replace their screen protectors as they actually stay stuck to the screen. For example, I've not had any problems previously with Power Support screen protectors (which is what I've ordered now).

Also, it's not free as you pay for delivery/shipping. I refuse to do so, as a matter of principle of course.

Ultimately, it's up to you, but as Smooth3006 said, InvisibleShields are "total garbage".

I use the crystal ones from phonedevil.com - they're only about £5 so a bit more than the cheap eBay ones but they feel much nicer and are more scratch resistant. Obviously it depends on which ones you get sent on eBay as they're mostly no name ones so you might be lucky and get a good one.

As far as covering the back aswell, I've only heard of the Zagg and have heard mixed things - they seem great in reviews but someone I know had one and it peeled around the sides. The problems could be with people not fitted them well enough but I've never used one so wouldn't know.

Have you looked into SGP Incredible Shields? Not really used those particular full body kits, but I do know that the SGP front screen protectors are pretty good quality.

My experience with the InvisibleShield on my iPhone 4 was that it started to peel off within 2 weeks. Eventually it'll get stuck to something in your pocket and peel off more. This has happened not only to me, but also 4 of my friends with the same phone and Zagg product.

It could be argued that other companies may not need to replace their screen protectors as they actually stay stuck to the screen. For example, I've not had any problems previously with Power Support screen protectors (which is what I've ordered now).

Also, it's not free as you pay for delivery/shipping. I refuse to do so, as a matter of principle of course.

Ultimately, it's up to you, but as Smooth3006 said, InvisibleShields are "total garbage".

Nice, those SGP have only good reviews on amazon! definitely taken as my first choice if I can't find anything else ! Thanks!

edit: though a bit on the expensive side.

The problems could be with people not fitted them well enough

Nope. Fitted it fine when I initially put it on.

Nice, those SGP have only good reviews on amazon! definitely taken as my first choice if I can't find anything else ! Thanks!

edit: though a bit on the expensive side.

Might be cheaper on eBay or the official SGP store?

Good luck!

I would say InvisibleSHIELD, easiest to apply of all screen protectors...

Though I only use it on the back and not on the screen, and when light comes from a angle on to the back the invisibleshield is well a little foggy or cloudy, don't know how good that would be on the screen.

Thought iPhones dont need one because the screen doesnt scratch? I posted some months back that Apple was stupid to remove these from their online store. I was replied back to by a few people saying that the screen doesnt scratch and they improved it.

Haters gonna hate.

The screen is scratch resistant and not unscratchable or scratch proof, it would have to be made out of diamonds or something along the line. And whadda ya know, almost every phone use scratch resistant surfaces (Except for low end models were it's just plastic coated for protection).

Haters gonna hate.

The screen is scratch resistant and not unscratchable or scratch proof, it would have to be made out of diamonds or something along the line. And whadda ya know, almost every phone use scratch resistant surfaces (Except for low end models were it's just plastic coated for protection).

Not trying to hate or bash here. Just asking a question. I was told people were keeping their iPhone in their pockets with keys and the keys never scratched the screen. I dont have personal experience with iPhones screens. I have used all models of iPhones, but I am not going to purposely scratch test a phone.

yeah normal wear and tear it should hold up. but if I can add extra protection that won't distort the display. Though I've put a previous 3GS thru hell and not one scratch on the glass, however the plastic on the back was a whole different story. On the iphone 4, it's different because it's glass on back and front, hence why i'm looking for a whole body protector. Again, scratch resistant doesn't mean it CAN'T get scratched.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!