iPhone screen protector


Recommended Posts

So i've been googling my way into what brand of screen protector to buy and i've narrowed it down to this:

1. BSE, best whole body protection, yet yellow peel effect. ( though you have to make your own soapy solution)

2. Body guardz, hard to apply, not so much yellow peel.

3. invisishiled, apparently begins to peel around the edges.

Anyway, though i'd ask, which brand have you used, had any problems with eg. like lint accumulating, edges peeling off, etc.

*It has to be a whole body, not just screen protector.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/936164-iphone-screen-protector/
Share on other sites

I have been using invisible shield for years now actually, even have it on my iphone, mac book pro and my magic mouse and magic trackpad and ipad.

I have bought so much that I am a zagg zealot ROFL.

That being said they are not without error at times. I have found some that seemed to look a little weird after applied but most were 100% great.

I dont understand why people think zagg is so bad because, heck, what other company will replace ones that have issues for free, for life.

If it peels off (usually after a LOT of use and going in and out of pocket etc), just get a replacement then send the old one back (the shield you peeled off) and its free.

My invisible shield on my X10 is sticking perfectly around the edges, no sign of peeling. while I was a bit worried about the orange skin surface, when you use it and don't look at an angle it's not noticeable. and unlike the smooth ones, you don't get finger smudges, and after a week when it's dried out, it also doesn't feel "sticky" unlike most bare screens or smooth screen protectors.

so yeah , I would have no problem recommending invisible shield.

Have you looked into SGP Incredible Shields? Not really used those particular full body kits, but I do know that the SGP front screen protectors are pretty good quality.

I dont understand why people think zagg is so bad because, heck, what other company will replace ones that have issues for free, for life.

If it peels off (usually after a LOT of use and going in and out of pocket etc), just get a replacement then send the old one back (the shield you peeled off) and its free.

My experience with the InvisibleShield on my iPhone 4 was that it started to peel off within 2 weeks. Eventually it'll get stuck to something in your pocket and peel off more. This has happened not only to me, but also 4 of my friends with the same phone and Zagg product.

It could be argued that other companies may not need to replace their screen protectors as they actually stay stuck to the screen. For example, I've not had any problems previously with Power Support screen protectors (which is what I've ordered now).

Also, it's not free as you pay for delivery/shipping. I refuse to do so, as a matter of principle of course.

Ultimately, it's up to you, but as Smooth3006 said, InvisibleShields are "total garbage".

I use the crystal ones from phonedevil.com - they're only about £5 so a bit more than the cheap eBay ones but they feel much nicer and are more scratch resistant. Obviously it depends on which ones you get sent on eBay as they're mostly no name ones so you might be lucky and get a good one.

As far as covering the back aswell, I've only heard of the Zagg and have heard mixed things - they seem great in reviews but someone I know had one and it peeled around the sides. The problems could be with people not fitted them well enough but I've never used one so wouldn't know.

Have you looked into SGP Incredible Shields? Not really used those particular full body kits, but I do know that the SGP front screen protectors are pretty good quality.

My experience with the InvisibleShield on my iPhone 4 was that it started to peel off within 2 weeks. Eventually it'll get stuck to something in your pocket and peel off more. This has happened not only to me, but also 4 of my friends with the same phone and Zagg product.

It could be argued that other companies may not need to replace their screen protectors as they actually stay stuck to the screen. For example, I've not had any problems previously with Power Support screen protectors (which is what I've ordered now).

Also, it's not free as you pay for delivery/shipping. I refuse to do so, as a matter of principle of course.

Ultimately, it's up to you, but as Smooth3006 said, InvisibleShields are "total garbage".

Nice, those SGP have only good reviews on amazon! definitely taken as my first choice if I can't find anything else ! Thanks!

edit: though a bit on the expensive side.

The problems could be with people not fitted them well enough

Nope. Fitted it fine when I initially put it on.

Nice, those SGP have only good reviews on amazon! definitely taken as my first choice if I can't find anything else ! Thanks!

edit: though a bit on the expensive side.

Might be cheaper on eBay or the official SGP store?

Good luck!

I would say InvisibleSHIELD, easiest to apply of all screen protectors...

Though I only use it on the back and not on the screen, and when light comes from a angle on to the back the invisibleshield is well a little foggy or cloudy, don't know how good that would be on the screen.

Thought iPhones dont need one because the screen doesnt scratch? I posted some months back that Apple was stupid to remove these from their online store. I was replied back to by a few people saying that the screen doesnt scratch and they improved it.

Haters gonna hate.

The screen is scratch resistant and not unscratchable or scratch proof, it would have to be made out of diamonds or something along the line. And whadda ya know, almost every phone use scratch resistant surfaces (Except for low end models were it's just plastic coated for protection).

Haters gonna hate.

The screen is scratch resistant and not unscratchable or scratch proof, it would have to be made out of diamonds or something along the line. And whadda ya know, almost every phone use scratch resistant surfaces (Except for low end models were it's just plastic coated for protection).

Not trying to hate or bash here. Just asking a question. I was told people were keeping their iPhone in their pockets with keys and the keys never scratched the screen. I dont have personal experience with iPhones screens. I have used all models of iPhones, but I am not going to purposely scratch test a phone.

yeah normal wear and tear it should hold up. but if I can add extra protection that won't distort the display. Though I've put a previous 3GS thru hell and not one scratch on the glass, however the plastic on the back was a whole different story. On the iphone 4, it's different because it's glass on back and front, hence why i'm looking for a whole body protector. Again, scratch resistant doesn't mean it CAN'T get scratched.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!