Good Bye AT&T DSL, Hello DOCSIS 3.0 Fiber !


Recommended Posts

Fiber? Isn't this just HFC? Hybrid Fibre Coaxial? if you are running on DOCSIS 3, You are on copper to the node, then its fiber.... just to get technical, its not FTTP (Fiber to the premisis)

This, it's not really a fiber optic connection, but it's still nice, I have it too.

More on topic though, TEX4S, I also have the TWC wideband service (the cheaper 30/5) one, and I'm curious where you live. I'm in Dallas and they only offer 30/5 for like $75 and 50/5 for $100. How are you getting these 90-200 mbps speeds?

Well, I can't wait for this tex. We have the turbo 15/1 package, which is the highest package they offer in our area, but nearby they rolled out the wideband service. I recently moved, so the cable tech said its coming soon, definitely getting it.

What the hell are you gonna use that much bandwidth for ??

You know, the usual....web browsing and email :whistle:

Fiber? Isn't this just HFC? Hybrid Fibre Coaxial? if you are running on DOCSIS 3, You are on copper to the node, then its fiber.... just to get technical, its not FTTP (Fiber to the premisis)

Youre right, fiber goes to a box on the side of my house, each house now has one on my street. The house is not wired for fiber optics though. It is a coax cable inside the house to the modem, then I have some fat Cat-6 to the puter

More on topic though, TEX4S, I also have the TWC wideband service (the cheaper 30/5) one, and I'm curious where you live. I'm in Dallas and they only offer 30/5 for like $75 and 50/5 for $100. How are you getting these 90-200 mbps speeds?

Well, I signed up for the 50/5 - the tech told me since it is fiber all the way to the house that I wont suffer from the typical performance drops like most cable modem customers, and that they havent really "regulated" the top end of the wideband stuff. He said Road Runner Extreme (30/5) was seeing a true 30 Mbps connection, and they havent capped the 50/5 in these situations...

So I guess I can take that as there will be a time when I am capped to what I pay for. $100 = 50/5

I am surrounded by fios areas. I am in Southlake. They call it Time Warner Total Home Digital or something ... :rolleyes:

Well, I can't wait for this tex. We have the turbo 15/1 package, which is the highest package they offer in our area, but nearby they rolled out the wideband service. I recently moved, so the cable tech said its coming soon, definitely getting it.

Apparently, they are not saying a whole lot about it, but being aggressive @ getting any area where fios isnt - I dont think they [TWC & Verizon] consider AT&T U-verse to be a real threat since they suck so horribly bad. If a tech told you its coming, I would think its coming pretty quick - thats cool !

Here is TWC's speed test :

Try it @ Dallas TWC

thats in Mb/sec

:huh:

LOL - could you imagine ? It would be like having your own OC128 in your house - a full length DVD rip in less than 10 seconds :drool:

Its 4:00 am and these speed tests are pretty sparatic - and my DL speeds on STEAM are only about 2.5MB/sec - so I am a little concerned already

Nice, but your ping is really high for fibre (20 ms). I get ~7 ms max on my building LAN <-> industry grade wireless over 2.4 GHz for about 2-3 km <-> ISP to a local speedtest.net server. Even a remote one (Seattle) is 12 ms. I guess the DOCSIS really adds a bit towards overhead...

How are you getting 370 with only 5 up ? Docis s with fiber to the building ? That makes no sense. Most fiber to the building is the same download and upload.

Time warner MUst really be screwing over the rest of its customers if they havent capped you to 50/5 speeds. Also i think the Speed test you are on is glitching out.

No way they have THAT many channels bonded together. Since what time warner is doing compaired to say cablevision ###### has to be a glitched speed test.

If yo uare trully uncapped you can bring the whole node down to its knees if you use your full bandwidth . IF thats the case haveing uncapped down/ 5 up but having barely any connection sometimes would stink..

I don't care that much for speed, I mean when a server does saturate my 7mbps bandwidth, that's usually enough to get what I want in a reasonable amount of time. What I absolutely cannot stand is download limits.

Here in Quebec, the best internet you can get is Bell Fibe 25, with 25Mbps download/ 7 Mbps, for about 60$ a month, which is not too horrible; however, you got a combined limit of 100GB per month. Do the math: you're limited to using your service at 100% for 6.9 hours a month. :whistle:

How are you getting 370 with only 5 up ? Docis s with fiber to the building ? That makes no sense. Most fiber to the building is the same download and upload.

Time warner MUst really be screwing over the rest of its customers if they havent capped you to 50/5 speeds. Also i think the Speed test you are on is glitching out.

No way they have THAT many channels bonded together. Since what time warner is doing compaired to say cablevision ###### has to be a glitched speed test.

If yo uare trully uncapped you can bring the whole node down to its knees if you use your full bandwidth . IF thats the case haveing uncapped down/ 5 up but having barely any connection sometimes would stink..

The speedtest.net one is glitchy - thats true. Yes Time Warner sucks (it took me 4 days to come to that realization)

The Time Warner speed test shows the same speeds though. The same speeds that are flaky as hell ...

I have been having some problems on and off again and have submitted 2 trouble tickets to the idiots in tech support. At least with AT&T DSL -- I felt their idiots have at least used a computer before. These Time Warner jack offs will flat out make crap up when they are stumped.

I had 1 chick tell me that I was having speed problems because in Device Manager my adapter didnt say "Network adapter" it only read "Gigabit Ethernet Controller" :blink:

Then when I told her she was an idiot she sounded like she was about to cry, which made me feel better - if I would have heard a gunshot over the phone - that would have made my day -=- true vindication !

I had 1 chick tell me that I was having speed problems because in Device Manager my adapter didnt say "Network adapter" it only read "Gigabit Ethernet Controller" :blink:

Then when I told her she was an idiot she sounded like she was about to cry, which made me feel better - if I would have heard a gunshot over the phone - that would have made my day -=- true vindication !

LOL :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

This is my speed:

954170454.png

BTW, I fix computers for alot of older people, I still am amazed how they call their ISP everytime there's something wrong with their computer.... and oh the answers they get, jesus....

This is my speed:

954170454.png

BTW, I fix computers for alot of older people, I still am amazed how they call their ISP everytime there's something wrong with their computer.... and oh the answers they get, jesus....

Dude the money they pay these people they probably can't get anyone in IT with a clue.

That speed test doesn't look accurate at all, DOCSIS 3 in Dallas Ft. Worth Area via Roadrunner, there is no way they are offering that kind of speed.

http://www.timewarnercable.com/Dallas/learn/hso/wideband-internet/ the highest plan they offer is 50mbit, even with the Business class stuff, the only way you are going to get that kind of speed is on their Metro Ethernet, which is going to run you $1k plus a month. You sure that test is working right, I see you ran the TWC speed test as well which is showing way lower, but still high. I am guessing they are using some type of "turboboost" option for short less then 1-2 minute downloads.

The $100 / month is just for internet, I have TV thru Dish Network, and dont have a land-line.

Since I was paying $40/mo for 6.0Mbps DSL - its a bargain.

Ive fixed the bad pings and more speedtests put it @ about 200Mbps. :D

I broke down and called their "tech support" - almost comical.

I seriously think my dog knows more than they do. Tier 2 was no better.

God I hope I never have to talk to them again - it was mind-numbing

You fixed the bad pings with this service? Please tell me how!!

Here is my story with TWC DOCSIS 3.0 service:

I've been using their Road Runner with turbo boost 18Mbps service for over 3 years with no problems at all, so when I found out about a faster service available in my area I'm thinking "juice me up!" So they install the Motorola Surfboard a week ago today and in that time period I have had 3 TWC techs out to my home to fix the ping problems and they have all been CLUELESS to put it politely. They all admitted to me that they had only setup 2 or 3 of these modems before and don't know what the problem is. In fact, the first installer had to pull wires out of the wall of my utility room and he couldn't get them back in the wall so he just left the house with a ball of wires hanging one foot out of my wall....that is not a joke or exaggeration.

So the main problem I have had with their new 30/5 service is that it is WAY slower than the 18/2 service I had from them before. It takes over a minute to load a page and trying to browse with tabs makes loading times go to about 3-5 minutes. Even with these slow speeds, tests at speedtest.net show me getting anywhere from 14 to 26 Mbps down and 2 - 3 Mbps up. The really story is at pingtest.net where it shows that I'm getting a 92% packet loss!!

When the clueless tech was at my home yesterday, he called his boss to tell him we were getting a 92% packet loss and his boss told him "that's not possible, because if he was getting a 92% packet loss he wouldn't be connected to the Internet." That's exactly my point, a hole!! Sure, the computer is connected to the Internet, but when it's taking over a minute to load a page like Google News, I don't feel like their wideband service is performing as advertised.

And yes, calling tech support for TWC is about as fun as getting repeated kicked in the balls by someone wearing golf spikes. If anyone can offer me some advice to help fix these issues without having to rely on TWC, I would be very thankful!!

Good download speed (if it is accurate) but why is your ping so high? I have to ping a server 900 miles away to get a ping that high (test in sig), if I ping one within 50 miles or so I get 20-30 ping with 2-3 jitter (according to pingtest.net).

My advertised service is 16/2, the speeds below are my power boosted speeds, but still I pretty much get my max download speed (2 MB/s) after power boost as long as the server I'm downloading from allows it, so I'm happy.

That being said, I really don't like TWC, they have decent internet, but the speed tiers sucked where I have lived in the past 3 years or so. Over in CA, I had the highest package they offered, which was 10/1, then over in SC I had the highest package they offered still, but it was only 10/0.5. What sucked is in SC, I could have moved down the street and gotten Comcast with 10/1 as a basic package, 15/2 for the same price as the one I was paying for TWCs 10/0.5.....its like they didn't care that they had competition in that area or something.

That speed test doesn't look accurate at all, DOCSIS 3 in Dallas Ft. Worth Area via Roadrunner, there is no way they are offering that kind of speed.

From what I have gathered in the past week - there are some areas where they dont have the 50Mb accounts capped - meaning they havent said "stop @ 50Mb/sec". Thats what I was told @ 1st...

Now I am told they now have caps in place and I am really only getting 50Mb/sec.

The speedtests like this: are bogus. Think of it like this:

Imagine your pipeline to your ISP is constipated, and you run a speedtest to check out the limits - that quick stress all of a sudden breaks the constipation and it sh*ts out an incredible amount of "data" all at once. And this happens over and over again - the more it hovers around 10Mb/sec - the faster it will eventually spit out the junk at the end.

You fixed the bad pings with this service? Please tell me how!!

If anyone can offer me some advice to help fix these issues without having to rely on TWC, I would be very thankful!!

Well - 2 ways - mentioned to their Tier 3 "specialists" about 50% packet loss and one of their servers was down resulting in a lot of re-direction (they claimed they didn't notice "that" one. Also, since their head office is in Flower Mound where my parents live, I figured the head honcho probably lives in their neighborhood... I was right.

PM me and I will give you a contact email addy of someone who can possibly fix everything. (its not the head honcho but someone high up enough to yell @ their underlings and make stuff happen)

Good download speed (if it is accurate) but why is your ping so high? ng.

The only thing I can guess is they rerouted me away from a known bad hop which was resulting in a lot of packet loss.

I do not know how any of this stuff works so I am making guesses. The pings went good after a week of complaining on and off. Now everything is normal - somewhat.

I have since quit looking @ speedtest.net & Time Warner's version because they dont tell me anything relevant.

I download a well-seeded torrent @ 6MB/sec - that tells me what I need to know.... I still hate TWC though.

The only thing I can guess is they rerouted me away from a known bad hop which was resulting in a lot of packet loss.

I do not know how any of this stuff works so I am making guesses. The pings went good after a week of complaining on and off. Now everything is normal - somewhat.

I have since quit looking @ speedtest.net & Time Warner's version because they dont tell me anything relevant.

Probably, seeing as (from what you say) it went back to normal. I agree with you on speed tests in general, with Power Boost and what not, a simple speed test is not a good representation of your speeds. I think Comcast and Time Warner use it so if someone complains about speed they can tell them to go to speedtest.net, do a speed test, and they will get the boosted speeds and Comcast/TWC can tell them their speeds are fine.

The only thing speed tests are good for nowadays is showing off what ridiculously high numbers you can get from them......they similar to benchmarks to try to find your PC performance, good for e-peen, but they mean next to nothing in actual performance. :p

I download a well-seeded torrent @ 6MB/sec - that tells me what I need to know.... I still hate TWC though.

That is a much better test IMO, I get around 2MB/s sustained from a good torrent after the initial burst wears off, it of course varies both higher and lower, but it matches up with my advertised once I lose power boost.

As for upload, I have no idea whats going on there, I pay for 2Mb/s (250 KB/s) but I have seen a sustained upload of 300-450KB/s, it doesn't stay there for a really long time, but longer than it should if it was due to power boost, I'm guessing it has to do a bit with network load in my area as well, but I seem to be able to consistently upload faster than my advertised speed. Not complaining, but its interesting.

Well - 2 ways - mentioned to their Tier 3 "specialists" about 50% packet loss and one of their servers was down resulting in a lot of re-direction (they claimed they didn't notice "that" one. Also, since their head office is in Flower Mound where my parents live, I figured the head honcho probably lives in their neighborhood... I was right.

PM me and I will give you a contact email addy of someone who can possibly fix everything. (its not the head honcho but someone high up enough to yell @ their underlings and make stuff happen)

I appreciate it!! However at this point it won't be necessary because I've already "downgraded" back to my original TWC cable Internet service. That's where I will be until AT&T finally gets the U-Verse box installed in my neighborhood (sometime before the end of this year, from what they've told me).

After 5 clueless TWC techs were out to my house in 9 days....I decided to give up all together on trying to make their DOCSIS 3.0 system work in my house.

I live in North Carolina and I have 10mbps/512kbps (highest offered) paying $60/month. The only options here is AT&T DSL (horrible I used to work for tech support) and Time Warner. Since TW has no competition here they have maxed out the speeds. If I lived in Wilson, NC they offer Greenlight which is all fiber and the speeds are awesome and so are the prices. I hate TW and AT&T just ridiculous....

Here is my speedtest and pingtest, the ping test is horrible and has been but TWC wont fix it sorry asses....

963245707.png 24613036.png

I just upgraded mine as well, from BT Total Broadband, to their new fibre optic "BT Infinity" package. Before hand I was getting 6Mb/s download on a good day and 350KB/s upload, now I'm getting 32Mb/s download at peak, with it usually being around 20Mb/s during the day, and 8Mb/s upload! It makes a big difference!

Also they told me my estimated connection would be around 21-22Mb/s so I'm very happy with it being 32! And ping is around 26ms :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!