Good Bye AT&T DSL, Hello DOCSIS 3.0 Fiber !


Recommended Posts

Fiber? Isn't this just HFC? Hybrid Fibre Coaxial? if you are running on DOCSIS 3, You are on copper to the node, then its fiber.... just to get technical, its not FTTP (Fiber to the premisis)

This, it's not really a fiber optic connection, but it's still nice, I have it too.

More on topic though, TEX4S, I also have the TWC wideband service (the cheaper 30/5) one, and I'm curious where you live. I'm in Dallas and they only offer 30/5 for like $75 and 50/5 for $100. How are you getting these 90-200 mbps speeds?

Well, I can't wait for this tex. We have the turbo 15/1 package, which is the highest package they offer in our area, but nearby they rolled out the wideband service. I recently moved, so the cable tech said its coming soon, definitely getting it.

What the hell are you gonna use that much bandwidth for ??

You know, the usual....web browsing and email :whistle:

Fiber? Isn't this just HFC? Hybrid Fibre Coaxial? if you are running on DOCSIS 3, You are on copper to the node, then its fiber.... just to get technical, its not FTTP (Fiber to the premisis)

Youre right, fiber goes to a box on the side of my house, each house now has one on my street. The house is not wired for fiber optics though. It is a coax cable inside the house to the modem, then I have some fat Cat-6 to the puter

More on topic though, TEX4S, I also have the TWC wideband service (the cheaper 30/5) one, and I'm curious where you live. I'm in Dallas and they only offer 30/5 for like $75 and 50/5 for $100. How are you getting these 90-200 mbps speeds?

Well, I signed up for the 50/5 - the tech told me since it is fiber all the way to the house that I wont suffer from the typical performance drops like most cable modem customers, and that they havent really "regulated" the top end of the wideband stuff. He said Road Runner Extreme (30/5) was seeing a true 30 Mbps connection, and they havent capped the 50/5 in these situations...

So I guess I can take that as there will be a time when I am capped to what I pay for. $100 = 50/5

I am surrounded by fios areas. I am in Southlake. They call it Time Warner Total Home Digital or something ... :rolleyes:

Well, I can't wait for this tex. We have the turbo 15/1 package, which is the highest package they offer in our area, but nearby they rolled out the wideband service. I recently moved, so the cable tech said its coming soon, definitely getting it.

Apparently, they are not saying a whole lot about it, but being aggressive @ getting any area where fios isnt - I dont think they [TWC & Verizon] consider AT&T U-verse to be a real threat since they suck so horribly bad. If a tech told you its coming, I would think its coming pretty quick - thats cool !

Here is TWC's speed test :

Try it @ Dallas TWC

thats in Mb/sec

:huh:

LOL - could you imagine ? It would be like having your own OC128 in your house - a full length DVD rip in less than 10 seconds :drool:

Its 4:00 am and these speed tests are pretty sparatic - and my DL speeds on STEAM are only about 2.5MB/sec - so I am a little concerned already

Nice, but your ping is really high for fibre (20 ms). I get ~7 ms max on my building LAN <-> industry grade wireless over 2.4 GHz for about 2-3 km <-> ISP to a local speedtest.net server. Even a remote one (Seattle) is 12 ms. I guess the DOCSIS really adds a bit towards overhead...

How are you getting 370 with only 5 up ? Docis s with fiber to the building ? That makes no sense. Most fiber to the building is the same download and upload.

Time warner MUst really be screwing over the rest of its customers if they havent capped you to 50/5 speeds. Also i think the Speed test you are on is glitching out.

No way they have THAT many channels bonded together. Since what time warner is doing compaired to say cablevision ###### has to be a glitched speed test.

If yo uare trully uncapped you can bring the whole node down to its knees if you use your full bandwidth . IF thats the case haveing uncapped down/ 5 up but having barely any connection sometimes would stink..

I don't care that much for speed, I mean when a server does saturate my 7mbps bandwidth, that's usually enough to get what I want in a reasonable amount of time. What I absolutely cannot stand is download limits.

Here in Quebec, the best internet you can get is Bell Fibe 25, with 25Mbps download/ 7 Mbps, for about 60$ a month, which is not too horrible; however, you got a combined limit of 100GB per month. Do the math: you're limited to using your service at 100% for 6.9 hours a month. :whistle:

How are you getting 370 with only 5 up ? Docis s with fiber to the building ? That makes no sense. Most fiber to the building is the same download and upload.

Time warner MUst really be screwing over the rest of its customers if they havent capped you to 50/5 speeds. Also i think the Speed test you are on is glitching out.

No way they have THAT many channels bonded together. Since what time warner is doing compaired to say cablevision ###### has to be a glitched speed test.

If yo uare trully uncapped you can bring the whole node down to its knees if you use your full bandwidth . IF thats the case haveing uncapped down/ 5 up but having barely any connection sometimes would stink..

The speedtest.net one is glitchy - thats true. Yes Time Warner sucks (it took me 4 days to come to that realization)

The Time Warner speed test shows the same speeds though. The same speeds that are flaky as hell ...

I have been having some problems on and off again and have submitted 2 trouble tickets to the idiots in tech support. At least with AT&T DSL -- I felt their idiots have at least used a computer before. These Time Warner jack offs will flat out make crap up when they are stumped.

I had 1 chick tell me that I was having speed problems because in Device Manager my adapter didnt say "Network adapter" it only read "Gigabit Ethernet Controller" :blink:

Then when I told her she was an idiot she sounded like she was about to cry, which made me feel better - if I would have heard a gunshot over the phone - that would have made my day -=- true vindication !

I had 1 chick tell me that I was having speed problems because in Device Manager my adapter didnt say "Network adapter" it only read "Gigabit Ethernet Controller" :blink:

Then when I told her she was an idiot she sounded like she was about to cry, which made me feel better - if I would have heard a gunshot over the phone - that would have made my day -=- true vindication !

LOL :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

This is my speed:

954170454.png

BTW, I fix computers for alot of older people, I still am amazed how they call their ISP everytime there's something wrong with their computer.... and oh the answers they get, jesus....

This is my speed:

954170454.png

BTW, I fix computers for alot of older people, I still am amazed how they call their ISP everytime there's something wrong with their computer.... and oh the answers they get, jesus....

Dude the money they pay these people they probably can't get anyone in IT with a clue.

That speed test doesn't look accurate at all, DOCSIS 3 in Dallas Ft. Worth Area via Roadrunner, there is no way they are offering that kind of speed.

http://www.timewarnercable.com/Dallas/learn/hso/wideband-internet/ the highest plan they offer is 50mbit, even with the Business class stuff, the only way you are going to get that kind of speed is on their Metro Ethernet, which is going to run you $1k plus a month. You sure that test is working right, I see you ran the TWC speed test as well which is showing way lower, but still high. I am guessing they are using some type of "turboboost" option for short less then 1-2 minute downloads.

The $100 / month is just for internet, I have TV thru Dish Network, and dont have a land-line.

Since I was paying $40/mo for 6.0Mbps DSL - its a bargain.

Ive fixed the bad pings and more speedtests put it @ about 200Mbps. :D

I broke down and called their "tech support" - almost comical.

I seriously think my dog knows more than they do. Tier 2 was no better.

God I hope I never have to talk to them again - it was mind-numbing

You fixed the bad pings with this service? Please tell me how!!

Here is my story with TWC DOCSIS 3.0 service:

I've been using their Road Runner with turbo boost 18Mbps service for over 3 years with no problems at all, so when I found out about a faster service available in my area I'm thinking "juice me up!" So they install the Motorola Surfboard a week ago today and in that time period I have had 3 TWC techs out to my home to fix the ping problems and they have all been CLUELESS to put it politely. They all admitted to me that they had only setup 2 or 3 of these modems before and don't know what the problem is. In fact, the first installer had to pull wires out of the wall of my utility room and he couldn't get them back in the wall so he just left the house with a ball of wires hanging one foot out of my wall....that is not a joke or exaggeration.

So the main problem I have had with their new 30/5 service is that it is WAY slower than the 18/2 service I had from them before. It takes over a minute to load a page and trying to browse with tabs makes loading times go to about 3-5 minutes. Even with these slow speeds, tests at speedtest.net show me getting anywhere from 14 to 26 Mbps down and 2 - 3 Mbps up. The really story is at pingtest.net where it shows that I'm getting a 92% packet loss!!

When the clueless tech was at my home yesterday, he called his boss to tell him we were getting a 92% packet loss and his boss told him "that's not possible, because if he was getting a 92% packet loss he wouldn't be connected to the Internet." That's exactly my point, a hole!! Sure, the computer is connected to the Internet, but when it's taking over a minute to load a page like Google News, I don't feel like their wideband service is performing as advertised.

And yes, calling tech support for TWC is about as fun as getting repeated kicked in the balls by someone wearing golf spikes. If anyone can offer me some advice to help fix these issues without having to rely on TWC, I would be very thankful!!

Good download speed (if it is accurate) but why is your ping so high? I have to ping a server 900 miles away to get a ping that high (test in sig), if I ping one within 50 miles or so I get 20-30 ping with 2-3 jitter (according to pingtest.net).

My advertised service is 16/2, the speeds below are my power boosted speeds, but still I pretty much get my max download speed (2 MB/s) after power boost as long as the server I'm downloading from allows it, so I'm happy.

That being said, I really don't like TWC, they have decent internet, but the speed tiers sucked where I have lived in the past 3 years or so. Over in CA, I had the highest package they offered, which was 10/1, then over in SC I had the highest package they offered still, but it was only 10/0.5. What sucked is in SC, I could have moved down the street and gotten Comcast with 10/1 as a basic package, 15/2 for the same price as the one I was paying for TWCs 10/0.5.....its like they didn't care that they had competition in that area or something.

That speed test doesn't look accurate at all, DOCSIS 3 in Dallas Ft. Worth Area via Roadrunner, there is no way they are offering that kind of speed.

From what I have gathered in the past week - there are some areas where they dont have the 50Mb accounts capped - meaning they havent said "stop @ 50Mb/sec". Thats what I was told @ 1st...

Now I am told they now have caps in place and I am really only getting 50Mb/sec.

The speedtests like this: are bogus. Think of it like this:

Imagine your pipeline to your ISP is constipated, and you run a speedtest to check out the limits - that quick stress all of a sudden breaks the constipation and it sh*ts out an incredible amount of "data" all at once. And this happens over and over again - the more it hovers around 10Mb/sec - the faster it will eventually spit out the junk at the end.

You fixed the bad pings with this service? Please tell me how!!

If anyone can offer me some advice to help fix these issues without having to rely on TWC, I would be very thankful!!

Well - 2 ways - mentioned to their Tier 3 "specialists" about 50% packet loss and one of their servers was down resulting in a lot of re-direction (they claimed they didn't notice "that" one. Also, since their head office is in Flower Mound where my parents live, I figured the head honcho probably lives in their neighborhood... I was right.

PM me and I will give you a contact email addy of someone who can possibly fix everything. (its not the head honcho but someone high up enough to yell @ their underlings and make stuff happen)

Good download speed (if it is accurate) but why is your ping so high? ng.

The only thing I can guess is they rerouted me away from a known bad hop which was resulting in a lot of packet loss.

I do not know how any of this stuff works so I am making guesses. The pings went good after a week of complaining on and off. Now everything is normal - somewhat.

I have since quit looking @ speedtest.net & Time Warner's version because they dont tell me anything relevant.

I download a well-seeded torrent @ 6MB/sec - that tells me what I need to know.... I still hate TWC though.

The only thing I can guess is they rerouted me away from a known bad hop which was resulting in a lot of packet loss.

I do not know how any of this stuff works so I am making guesses. The pings went good after a week of complaining on and off. Now everything is normal - somewhat.

I have since quit looking @ speedtest.net & Time Warner's version because they dont tell me anything relevant.

Probably, seeing as (from what you say) it went back to normal. I agree with you on speed tests in general, with Power Boost and what not, a simple speed test is not a good representation of your speeds. I think Comcast and Time Warner use it so if someone complains about speed they can tell them to go to speedtest.net, do a speed test, and they will get the boosted speeds and Comcast/TWC can tell them their speeds are fine.

The only thing speed tests are good for nowadays is showing off what ridiculously high numbers you can get from them......they similar to benchmarks to try to find your PC performance, good for e-peen, but they mean next to nothing in actual performance. :p

I download a well-seeded torrent @ 6MB/sec - that tells me what I need to know.... I still hate TWC though.

That is a much better test IMO, I get around 2MB/s sustained from a good torrent after the initial burst wears off, it of course varies both higher and lower, but it matches up with my advertised once I lose power boost.

As for upload, I have no idea whats going on there, I pay for 2Mb/s (250 KB/s) but I have seen a sustained upload of 300-450KB/s, it doesn't stay there for a really long time, but longer than it should if it was due to power boost, I'm guessing it has to do a bit with network load in my area as well, but I seem to be able to consistently upload faster than my advertised speed. Not complaining, but its interesting.

Well - 2 ways - mentioned to their Tier 3 "specialists" about 50% packet loss and one of their servers was down resulting in a lot of re-direction (they claimed they didn't notice "that" one. Also, since their head office is in Flower Mound where my parents live, I figured the head honcho probably lives in their neighborhood... I was right.

PM me and I will give you a contact email addy of someone who can possibly fix everything. (its not the head honcho but someone high up enough to yell @ their underlings and make stuff happen)

I appreciate it!! However at this point it won't be necessary because I've already "downgraded" back to my original TWC cable Internet service. That's where I will be until AT&T finally gets the U-Verse box installed in my neighborhood (sometime before the end of this year, from what they've told me).

After 5 clueless TWC techs were out to my house in 9 days....I decided to give up all together on trying to make their DOCSIS 3.0 system work in my house.

I live in North Carolina and I have 10mbps/512kbps (highest offered) paying $60/month. The only options here is AT&T DSL (horrible I used to work for tech support) and Time Warner. Since TW has no competition here they have maxed out the speeds. If I lived in Wilson, NC they offer Greenlight which is all fiber and the speeds are awesome and so are the prices. I hate TW and AT&T just ridiculous....

Here is my speedtest and pingtest, the ping test is horrible and has been but TWC wont fix it sorry asses....

963245707.png 24613036.png

I just upgraded mine as well, from BT Total Broadband, to their new fibre optic "BT Infinity" package. Before hand I was getting 6Mb/s download on a good day and 350KB/s upload, now I'm getting 32Mb/s download at peak, with it usually being around 20Mb/s during the day, and 8Mb/s upload! It makes a big difference!

Also they told me my estimated connection would be around 21-22Mb/s so I'm very happy with it being 32! And ping is around 26ms :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This is what I want. Hey Gemini, how do I remove you from all my google products permanently?
    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!