Hacker finds iOS 4.1 bootrom vulnerability


Recommended Posts

Hacker finds iOS 4.1 bootrom vulnerability that can jailbreak all current hardware

http://www.geek.com/articles/apple/hacker-finds-ios-4-1-bootrom-vulnerability-that-can-jailbreak-all-current-hardware-2010099/

Yesterday?s release of iOS 4.1 was good news for iPhone gamers and iPhone 3G owners who had performance issues post-4.0, but bad news for jailbreakers, with the Dev Team themselves warning users not to upgrade to 4.1 as there was no known way to reverse the baseband post-update.

As usual, though, what?s true in the cat-and-mouse jailbreaking scene one day is not true the other, and now there?s good news for jailbreakers, at least in theory. iPhone hacker pod2g has revealed on Twitter that he has successfully discovered a new bootrom exploit, and even better: all the new iOS hardware including the iPhone 4 and new iPod Touch is vulnerable to it.

The good news here is that means that Apple would be powerless to patch this vulnerability through software, since its a hardware issue? but that won?t necessarily stop them from patching up the issue at the factory for any hardware that comes down the line in coming months.

So, in theory, the Dev Team should be able to use this to jailbreak any iPod Touches and iPhone 4s currently in the wild? but given Apple?s historic response to jailbreaking, don?t expect this vulnerability to last. If you want a new iPod Touch or iPhone 4, and if you want to jailbreak it, buy your device now? if you buy it in a few months, you may very well be out of luck.

Hacker finds iOS 4.1 bootrom vulnerability that can jailbreak all current hardware

http://www.geek.com/articles/apple/hacker-finds-ios-4-1-bootrom-vulnerability-that-can-jailbreak-all-current-hardware-2010099/

Yesterday?s release of iOS 4.1 was good news for iPhone gamers and iPhone 3G owners who had performance issues post-4.0, but bad news for jailbreakers, with the Dev Team themselves warning users not to upgrade to 4.1 as there was no known way to reverse the baseband post-update.

As usual, though, what?s true in the cat-and-mouse jailbreaking scene one day is not true the other, and now there?s good news for jailbreakers, at least in theory. iPhone hacker pod2g has revealed on Twitter that he has successfully discovered a new bootrom exploit, and even better: all the new iOS hardware including the iPhone 4 and new iPod Touch is vulnerable to it.

The good news here is that means that Apple would be powerless to patch this vulnerability through software, since its a hardware issue? but that won?t necessarily stop them from patching up the issue at the factory for any hardware that comes down the line in coming months.

So, in theory, the Dev Team should be able to use this to jailbreak any iPod Touches and iPhone 4s currently in the wild? but given Apple?s historic response to jailbreaking, don?t expect this vulnerability to last. If you want a new iPod Touch or iPhone 4, and if you want to jailbreak it, buy your device now? if you buy it in a few months, you may very well be out of luck.

I believe there is also a known vulnrability in the iOS itself which will allow for a type of usenet jailbreak similar to the jailbreak.me site? Although this could\would be patched by a software update, for now, it would be great if someone would release a jailbreak using this method until the bootrom exploit is configured correctly.

I know the current JBs for 4.0.2 work in 4.1, but result in the phone app missing, but im thinking of running the JB and fixing the app myself, until an official JB is released in the comeing days.

No point in having more than one exploit out in the wild since Apple will just patch it and then when the next version comes out it can't be used. :p

Urm, but why not use the current software exploit to create a usenet jailbreak, whilst the bootrom JB is being created. After that Apple can patch the software exploit all they want.

Its funny how companies put sooo much money in to protecting their products and before or soon after some is released, it gets hacked. They cannot win so why do they bother.

To make it difficult :)

If enough users did it, and they could do it with the simple download of one application for all firmware releases, it would be a lot more common. As it is many users stay away because they fear bricking their phones, they don't understand what firmware version they have or what program to use to do it. Or they've just never thought of the benefits and label it as "something geeks do".

IMHO apple have had reasonable success keeping people from doing this, I know plenty of people who refuse to jailbreak pretty much solely for the above reasons.

Its funny how companies put sooo much money in to protecting their products and before or soon after some is released, it gets hacked. They cannot win so why do they bother.

first, i am assuming you are referring to Apple since this is an iOS thread.

Apple should just give up because people found and took advantage of a hole in the iPhone/iPad/iPod Touch?

Apple is a publicity traded company worth billions of dollars, there's a clear and obvious reason they continue to patch the software, not to mention the number of people that would out of work if they were no longer writing and fixing the software

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!