[WIN7] How To Make it Like XP


Recommended Posts

Ahhh... this reminds me of the days after the XP launch when countless discontent individuals would rant for days about how ugly XP was, how a cartoon had thrown up on their monitors and to vow never to run it except in Windows Classic mode.??What's old is new.??Maybe you can show this thread to the next generation when they're trying to make Windows 9 (which looks horrible) feel like good ol' Windows 7.

Winful post is winful. My opinion exactly.

Why is everyone bitching at the guy for choosing not to use UAC? I don't use UAC as I find it intrusive and a general PITA. I don't like it running in the background regardless of whether if notifies me or not.

It's like bitching at people for not running an anti-virus, I've never run anti-virus software and never will - I also can't remember the last time I got a virus... and best of all, if I do happen to get any issues I'd simply format. Formatting is not a big deal for me, it doesn't take me hours to do and I have a dedicated OS drive.

This is my point exactly. Every user has the option to adjust the level of protection their system receives. Some may not require such a high level of protection because they use their PC responsibly. Other's may just feel more comfortable with their PC running every anti-whatever software they can find. That's their choice.

Because you are basically saying "Yes, I wish to install every application I try to install"

Noone seems to understand the meaning of UAC.

BTW, if you run without UAC, then you must also run without antivirus, a firewall or antimalware correct?

The keyword here is I. Of course I do wish to install the programs I run the executable for. I copy and pasted Microsoft's definition directly from their website, and it couldn't be any more clear. I know exactly what UAC does and is meant for, and I don't receive any benefits by having it enabled. End of story.

All of my PCs do run an antivirus and firewall, and I am running one on the PC I am using to type this message. Though, to humor myself, I did decide to run my PC without any form of protection for a month, and when I scanned my system with popular protection software at the end of that month it came up clean. I take care of my PC, and with the aid of a hardware firewall built into my router there is no good reason to go over the top with protecting my system. The majority of viruses, malware and spyware aren't caused by lack of protection, they're caused by irresponsible browsing and downloading.

I visit the same sites daily, all of which I trust. I only download software from trusted sites as well. There is no reason I should have an extra layer of "security" enabled for the sole purpose of asking me if I really want to run that driver or software I just downloaded.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!