Microsoft halves number of available TechNet keys


Recommended Posts

Says the person whining that Technet should be ripped off. :whistle:

If you don't want people calling you a child then don't act like one.

Quote the post I said those exact words - or are you twisting things to cause a flame war ?

This is quite possibly the most ignorant thing I've read in a long time.

Congrats.

You need to read more

Technet deserves to be taken for everything they got considering the pricing of retail MS products
Says the person whining that Technet should be ripped off
Quote the post I said those exact words - or are you twisting things to cause a flame war ?

Explain exactly what you meant then by "taken for everything they got" if not "ripped off"...

Because I don't see that TRC was twisting anything.

Explain exactly what you meant then by "taken for everything they got" if not "ripped off"...

Because I don't see that TRC was twisting anything.

10 keys! I dont think MS should have limited the keys to 5, I think they should have kept it at 10 so we could "TAKE THEM FOR EVERYTHING THEY GOT"

And how can you not see him twisting something when he Quotes me saying something that I did not

What do you call that ? The absolute truth ?

10 keys! I dont think MS should have limited the keys to 5, I think they should have kept it at 10 so we could "TAKE THEM FOR EVERYTHING THEY GOT"

They're evaluation keys, so what real difference does it make to most here. It's not like you can actually legally use them on production systems.

And how can you not see him twisting something when he Quotes me saying something that I did not

He didn't quote you at all, so that argument is not valid. He interpreted your post the way most would bearing in mind that previous posts had been about piracy, and so on.

And you have yet to post what "TAKE THEM FOR EVERYTHING THEY GOT" actually means then? Take the 10 licenses? Well all they are giving now is 5 - so if you want to take the max licenses, then go ahead. It's 5.

I think you are climbing down without the ability to say you are, though.

They're evaluation keys, so what real difference does it make to most here. It's not like you can actually legally use them on production systems.

Pricing, again

MS charge a considerable amount for a Technet account and considering its limited licensing rules to start with I disagree with what they have done

He didn't quote you at all, so that argument is not valid. He interpreted your post the way most would bearing in mind that previous posts had been about piracy, and so on.

And you have yet to post what "TAKE THEM FOR EVERYTHING THEY GOT" actually means then? Take the 10 licenses? Well all they are giving now is 5 - so if you want to take the max licenses, then go ahead. It's 5.

I think you are climbing down without the ability to say you are, though.

Huh ?

Who brought you into this argument anyway ? You just bored ?

If you cant understand what I mean, when I explain it to you, maybe you shouldn't be replying, and instead, draw some pictures or something less mentally intensive.

If I thought MS Technet should be ripped off, I would have ripped them off with my own account full of keys and downloads.

Huh ?

Which part you not getting?

Who brought you into this argument anyway ? You just bored ?

You posted an assinine comment in a public forum, which I was already taking part in.

If you cant understand what I mean, when I explain it to you, maybe you shouldn't be replying, and instead, draw some pictures or something less mentally intensive.

You have still yet to explain without any vague references what "TAKE THEM FOR EVERYTHING THEY GOT" means... Strugling here to justify your original comment? Seems like it.

So the limit came in after I generated my keys, that means all 10 will still activate right? But new products will only allow me to generate 5 in the future ?

Same deal here, looks like it works fine for me. I did go through my account a fair while back and generate all the keys for fun so it looks like that paid off!

I hope you are joking because yes, it is expensive.

Compared to the low-tech OS costs of the 1980s, which would translate even higher considering inflation, Windows 7 is dirt farking cheap. Even Ultimate is a steal.

This is all a result of Windows being the dominant OS for so long. When you only have one OS to choose from off store shelves, and you don't have other prices to compare it to, you start feeling like it's expensive. But believe it or not, before all of MS's 'shady' practices, they were winning marketshare by being cheap as crap (competitors even complained that there was no way they could sell their product alongside MS's prices).

It's fun to watch old episodes of Computer Chronicles. XD (Apple rep in the early 90s: "*chuckle* Yeah, it's safe to say we're FINALLY past the days of Jobs.")

It's never failed to baffle me that the same people who'll drop $200+ on a video card might be the ones whining about the cost of their OS, though. I realize it's not the case for every complaint, but man. The only people who are actually buying Windows off the shelf are people who are either upgrading old computers or building new ones. If you're building from scratch, you should have a sense of perspective regarding the cost of components, and one would hope you'd be viewing the OS as just as important a component as the harddrive, video card, PSU, etc. If you're upgrading an old computer, you should have either the same perspective from building that one, or, if it's vendor-made, you got it dirt cheap thanks to crapware, and can certainly afford to pay for an OS after all that. :p

Perspective, kids. Get some.

Same deal here, looks like it works fine for me. I did go through my account a fair while back and generate all the keys for fun so it looks like that paid off!

Lol yea I did that a while ago, took ages, but well worth every second.

Which part you not getting?

You posted an assinine comment in a public forum, which I was already taking part in.

You have still yet to explain without any vague references what "TAKE THEM FOR EVERYTHING THEY GOT" means... Strugling here to justify your original comment? Seems like it.

Well I feel I have explained well enough for most people with an IQ higher than a peanut to understand, so I will make no further attempts to lower myself in order to only satisfy your lack of ability to understand a sentence.

Huh? Windows 7 Home Premium is $177 from Amazon. That's not expensive for something you use every day for years.

Well no, over the life of your PC it is not expensive.

However, many many people are short sighted and would see the initial cost as something they would rather not invest in.

If they reduce our number of keys available by 50%, they should reduce the price by 50%.

Well, they have a new lower-priced level. You can get Technet Standard for $199. $149 to renew. You can also find coupons online which can lower it even more.

As far as this thread, I don't really know what all the fuss is about. If you need more keys, you can call Microsoft and get more. So, in effect, you haven't really lost anything.

Kids these days. :wacko:

Uhh you guys do realize that in the event you need more keys for a particular product you can just call and get more keys right? I mean it does suck that they halved the number of keys, but it's just to prevent people from running wild with them. If you have a legitimate need for additional keys they will give you more without any issue.

Well I feel I have explained well enough for most people with an IQ higher than a peanut to understand, so I will make no further attempts to lower myself in order to only satisfy your lack of ability to understand a sentence.

No - you made another vague comment to answer the lack of clarity in your original comment.

All I see now is someone not able to back up their original stupid comment with a coherrant argument... Yawn...

Anyone else here, please enlighten me as to what this person means by "taken for everything they got"...

i actually bought the full retail copy of win 7 ultimate for like $400 last xmas. although i really should've got the oem version and saved quite a few dollars, i still feel it's worth it.

my only issue with it, is lack of flexibility in being able to transfer the license to a new PC, and being able to easily uninstall it from an old PC. which is something i didn't anticipate this last time but know now for the future.

it seems like people really do abuse technet, simply generating keys willy nilly and using them for daily long term use. it's really to evaluate the software for corporate/company purchases, not for home long term use. it's not for you to have a cheap way to put windows on all your home pc's or your family and friends' pc's. there are family packs of windows at a decent price, as well as other ms products. the fact that you can call in for more keys makes the rage over this kinda silly, because really it just cuts down on the convenience factor of technet, more than anything else.

the cost of windows is a fairly small part of the price of building a brand new pc from teh ground up. if you buy an OEM copy and put it on a ssd, the drive it's on costs more than the OS itself.

my only issue with it, is lack of flexibility in being able to transfer the license to a new PC, and being able to easily uninstall it from an old PC. which is something i didn't anticipate this last time but know now for the future.

I thought a person was allowed to do that. Just need to phone it to Microsoft and get re-activated. I could be wrong. I often times am. :yes:

If they reduce our number of keys available by 50%, they should reduce the price by 50%.

What? Other than the fact that you get access to a LOT of software? You also get early access to betas and release candidates... If I have the money, $150 would be great! I would subscribe, because that is amazing!

Oh, yeah... And to those saying these are for evaluation purposes only, if you ever watched (or listened to) Windows Weekly, you would know that Paul Thurrott contacted Microsoft and asked about whether or not you could use this stuff for home purposes... Guess what? You can! Why do you think they made another subscription option? One is for the home user, another is for IT.

The only thing you cannot do is go around installing Windows, Office, etc. on all the computers in your neighborhood, office, or anything like that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!