GT5 delayed because of XMB OS security breach


Recommended Posts

Like I said it is manufacturing issues. I had it confirmed today.

The problem arose when SCE mandated SDK 350 on all games releasing after after October, GT5 was about to go gold running on SDK 341, but it has been delayed by around a week so that they can update to SDK 350. This has caused a big headache for the manufacturing side, given how big this game is missing the gold date by even a week can cause a months worth of delay as slots are already taken up at this time of year for Blu-ray movies and such. So Sony had to find a 3 week slot big enough to make 7m+ copies of this and get them shipped out.

If you want to blame anyone, I would direct it at the pirates and hackers, SCE never had any real SDK restrictions before firmware 3.41 was compromised.

Source: http://forum.blu-ray...tml#post3872491

Seems very logical to me.

seems illogical to me ... release it then add a GT5 patch at a later date ....

Uh, if it's released only requiring firmware 3.41 then it's hacked day 1, a patch does nothing.

sure, pass the buck to the hackers, take the easy way out. you really thing releasing the game with 3.41 support would have killed sales that dramatically if at all?

and did you post earlier that it was the developers who missed the date by 3 days which caused this entire debacle? everyone is full of ****.

sure, pass the buck to the hackers, take the easy way out. you really thing releasing the game with 3.41 support would have killed sales that dramatically if at all?

and did you post earlier that it was the developers who missed the date by 3 days which caused this entire debacle? everyone is full of ****.

Well you can't expect for-profit companies to just accept piracy and not put on any kind of resistance. If there's a chance they can prevent their biggest game from being pirated at launch they're gonna try it.

Andy for one would pirate GT5 instead of buying it :p

Well you can't expect for-profit companies to just accept piracy and not put on any kind of resistance. If there's a chance they can prevent their biggest game from being pirated at launch they're gonna try it.

Andy for one would pirate GT5 instead of buying it :p

yeah definitely would ;) but i don't beleive anyone sony/PD related anymore.

Makes sense I guess, if they needed to update the game, that would have pushed back being sent to manufacturing which is apparently quite busy this time of year, so they would have had to move things around, I guess this is why they have deadlines, lol.

That's not at all what Kaz has said. Something fishy is going on here.

I don't see how that is any different really.

Well I bet you £10 GT5 now comes with FW 3.50 on the disc rofl.gif

dude that's like 20 from where i am, and if i made that bet i might as well flush it down the toilet, it would be the same thing (yes i guess i technically called you a toilet :| )

and seth grouchy? noooooooooooo never ;)

Sony can't blame anyone except themself, pirates didn't pop up just now you know.

That doesn't make it right. If it were not for pirates, we wouldn't need security like this. I blame those that steal, not Sony.

dude that's like 20 from where i am, and if i made that bet i might as well flush it down the toilet, it would be the same thing (yes i guess i technically called you a toilet :| )

and seth grouchy? noooooooooooo never ;)

But I'm poor just now :( ?10 will buy you a few pints!

I don't blame pirates, they've been doing what they're doing for long long time. Sony can't blame anyone except themself, pirates didn't pop up just now you know.

Well they can blame themselves for the popularity of GT, if this were some translated JRPG like Demons Souls they wouldn't need to manufacture millions of discs for the release date rofl.gif

Well they can blame themselves for the popularity of GT, if this were some translated JRPG like Demons Souls they wouldn't need to manufacture millions of discs for the release date rofl.gif

Exactly what I'm trying to say, they should've seen this coming. They should've been prepared for this, it really stupid decision to implements this just before RTM.

Bit more info on who posted this

PS3 Firmware the Real Cause of Gran Turismo 5's Delay?

More information is slowly filtering out aboutGT5's delay, and it fits in neatly with everything else we've learned about the game's production in the past 24 hours. Here's what was recently posted by Maximus ? a respected moderator at the Blu-Ray.com forums with reported connections to Sony:

Like I said it is manufacturing issues. I had it confirmed today.

The problem arose when SCE mandated SDK 350 on all games releasing after after October, GT5 was about to go gold running on SDK 341, but it has been delayed by around a week so that they can update to SDK 350. This has caused a big headache for the manufacturing side, given how big this game is missing the gold date by even a week can cause a months worth of delay as slots are already taken up at this time of year for Blu-ray movies and such. So Sony had to find a 3 week slot big enough to make 7m+ copies of this and get them shipped out.

If you want to blame anyone, I would direct it at the pirates and hackers, SCE never had any real SDK restrictions before firmware 3.41 was compromised.

After getting attention from news outlets such as Eurogamer and TheSixthAxis, evidence of the post has since been removed, but it offers a very reasonable explanation about why Polyphony Digital missed their production window by only 3 days. Sure enough, the new PS3 3.50 firmware is considerably more secure than 3.41 and preventing distribution of a 3.41-compatible GT5 will ensure that it can't be pirated (for now).

Thanks to all of you who sent this in so quickly!

Source: http://www.gtplanet.net/ps3-firmware-the-real-cause-of-gran-turismo-5s-delay/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!