Mac OS X Lion Discussion


Recommended Posts

Damn it, I knew this wasn?t an english term :p

What I mean is, they make the feature stand up (I found what I wanted to say :laugh: ) compared to what it was before with the obscure shortcut. If you hadn?t told me, I would never have known about it and would have kept using "Look up in Dictionary", which does the same thing, but actually opens that application.

I understand what you meant before, but how is the feature more apparent in Mac OS X Lion compared to Mac OS X Snow Leopard for example?

I think the correct term you're looking for is to stand out. :)

The file names in Snow Leopard are also compressed when reducing the column?s widths, but it?s not as intense as in Lion. As you say, it?s as if there was no space between Screen and Shot...

I understand what you meant before, but how is the feature more apparent in Mac OS X Lion compared to Mac OS X Snow Leopard for example?

Isn't the correct term "stand out" btw?

Yep, stand out, sorry. I?m having a hard day in English I guess :laugh:

It?s more apparent in the sense that it is more intuitive to make this Quick Look window appear. I?m wondering how many people knew about control + command + d.

It?s more apparent in the sense that it is more intuitive to make this Quick Look window appear. I?m wondering how many people knew about control + command + d.

There's something going wrong in the way we communicate right now. I'll give it a third shot: What does Mac OS X Lion do to make access to the Dictionary pop-up window more intuitive compared to Mac OS X Snow Leopard? Through what other means can I make it appear in Mac OS X Lion beyond using the control + command + D keyboard shortcut?

There's something going wrong in the way we communicate right now. I'll give it a third shot: What does Mac OS X Lion do to make access to the Dictionary pop-up window more intuitive compared to Mac OS X Snow Leopard? Through what other means can I make it appear in Mac OS X Lion beyond using the control + command + D keyboard shortcut?

Ah, sorry my bad, the way you said "it?s not a Safari thing, it?s throughout the entire OS" made me think you realized that in Lion, you can use the "Look up" feature in the contextual menu. Boom, the popup window appears. No more control + command + d.

Pressing "Look up in Dictionary" through the Safari contextual menu doesn't do anything over here. :laugh: It doesn't show the pop-up window, nor does it launch Dictionary. I've only been using the keyboard shortcut in Mac OS X Lion like I normally would in Mac OS X Snow Leopard.

I'll be formatting my Mac tomorrow. It's not so much the bugs that bug me, but the fact most applications have a hard time on Mac OS X Lion. VMware Fusion fails to start my VMs, Transmission is unstable, both InDesign and Photoshop CS5 act quirky etc. Having to go back to Mac OS X Snow Leopard will suck though after running Mac OS X Lion intensively for the past few days. I don't want to see old Aqua again! Grrrrr :/

In addition to the floating PDF controls not currently working in Safari 5.1, I've also come across a very minor UI bug when using the Reader feature:

post-119000-0-37326800-1299025000.png

The left side is fine, but you can see on the right the out-of-place white strip. It appears to be lacking the gradient that would make appear to be curling downward with the rest of the page elements.

I noticed this, too, and I like it. The white HUD is really starting to grow on me, it does look nice. I thought it would have been kind of neat if each little sub-section of the Dictionary HUD could be scrolled downward to read the end of the definitions, but it doesn't do that.

They do expand. Click on one of the definitions and you get this:

Screen_Shot_2011-03-01_at_8.13.39_PM.png

So i found an odd quirk

not really a bug or a feature as it relies on a mod

but

i followed instructions i found somewhere to make the Lauchpad icon have a "remove from dock" option in the context menu

and when it is not in the dock, you cannot move the finder icon, however you can move other icons to the left of it

useless

but

interesting nonetheless

just in case anyone was thinking about completely throwing themselves off by making that finder icon move around

post-337036-0-87952400-1299033259.jpg

I didn't see it posted anywhere but the dialog that asks you if you want to save a file changed:

post-1419-0-99840100-1299039356.png

I assume that text has yet to be updated, because I thought the whole point of Lion was even if you quit the app, your work is automatically saved.

Also, as a reminder to those with valid ADC accounts, remember you can use the Bug Tracker to also file unwanted changes or request a feature. I've already filed a report stating that the user should be able to assign a custom name to their Space/Desktop, especially with Mission Control making the generic "Desktop 1, 2, etc." more prominent.

I assume that text has yet to be updated, because I thought the whole point of Lion was even if you quit the app, your work is automatically saved.

Also, as a reminder to those with valid ADC accounts, remember you can use the Bug Tracker to also file unwanted changes or request a feature. I've already filed a report stating that the user should be able to assign a custom name to their Space/Desktop, especially with Mission Control making the generic "Desktop 1, 2, etc." more prominent.

How would it save something you didn't name yet? Where would it put it?

How would it save something you didn't name yet? Where would it put it?

Someone made a thread on another board about Versions, and apparently if you type something into TextEdit and don't actually save the file, quit the app and then open it again, "Untitled" simply reappears exactly where you left off, the text still in place. It's stored in memory somewhere. And that's why the save sheet seems to be wrong, since with Resume, apparently you can't lose data that you didn't manually save anymore.

Someone made a thread on another board about Versions, and apparently if you type something into TextEdit and don't actually save the file, quit the app and then open it again, "Untitled" simply reappears exactly where you left off, the text still in place. It's stored in memory somewhere. And that's why the save sheet seems to be wrong, since with Resume, apparently you can't lose data that you didn't manually save anymore.

I got that sheet by pressing cmd-w not q ;) so that's probably why since it wouldn't save the state and I'm specifically asking to close that window

So Apple is ahead than Microsoft in dropping the 32bit processors in favor of the 64bit. Let see if Windows 8 will follow up.

Actually, the issue with Windows has not been the hardware base or the OEMs, but the enterprises and the installed user-base. While greater than half the Windows 7 OEM sales outside of Starter (which is x32-only) are 64-bit (and even Starter is only sold in developing markets and on netbooks), there's still a lot of x32 pre-7 out there, and that is especially true in enterprises - there are 64-bit-capable refurbs out there that are running Windows XP simply due to their age (and having the misfortune to predate the launch of Windows 7). While 64-bit-capable Intel CPUs became popular with Core, the architecture predates it - the first general-purpose x64 Intel desktop CPU that wasn't a XEON was in the LGA775 socket, but was a Pentium 4 Prescott (from the old Netburst architecture). The closest problem Apple has to that is the still-running base of G4 and G5 Power towers (none of which can run Lion, and some of which can't even run Leopard.

)

cause osx doesn't have directx

OS X *does* have a largely-unified driver model - the only real difference software-wise between the CI/QE model and DirectX are the core building blocks. The difference is bigger in terms of *hardware* - Apple picks a lot of nits when it comes up the upgrade/aftermarket hardware market (far more than is the case for otherwise-identical PC hardware). Still, the OS X model is not as demanding on developers as is that of Windows (at any end - low, middle, or high) largely because there is no real high end when it comes to Mac-based games other than MMOs and Starcraft (note that both WoW and Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty sell quite well on the Mac). Also, the install is MUCH easier on a Mac. (In most cases: drag, drop, play.)

I got that sheet by pressing cmd-w not q ;) so that's probably why since it wouldn't save the state and I'm specifically asking to close that window

Here's a really short video I did with TextEdit. It demonstrates how quitting the application will save any untitled work to memory. But then once it's actually saved and then you quit the app, it doesn't show up automatically unless opened the usual way.

EDIT: Didn't expect the video quality to be as awful as it appears. The TextEdit window is really tiny, too, sorry about that.

No more Spotlight indexing maybe?

No, CPU Use as been fine since the installation spotlighting only took a few minutes on the SSD, I'm talking about the GPU.... but speaking of, why isn't mdworker a darned Multithreaded Process yet?!

iStat Menus is working on Lion? Mine doesn't work.

Mine worked fine off the bat, but I have iStat Pro, apparently the Pro and Normal version follow different dev cycles.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!