[iPhone] Epic's Infinity Blade (formerly Project Sword)


Recommended Posts

"So we have the engine up and running on Android, and we're supplying it to licensees. We don't have any immediate plans in terms of our own games for it yet," Rein told Ars. "Our concerns are probably the same as John Carmack's. Lots of good hardware, but it's all over the map, and the rest of the issues he pretty much addresses [in the recent Ars interview]. It will get there, I'm sure, but our technology can be licensed and used on Android. It's just not as big a focus for us as iOS."

Great game! I am addicted! Wish you can play online with friends (WOW style)

They announced a multiplayer patch releasing soon

Future content updates for Infinity Blade include a fully integrated multiplayer mode, which enables players to battle friends and other players online via Game Center.

http://www.epicgames.com/infinityblade/

which enables players to battle friends and other players online via Game Center.

Meh, that would get boring real fast! now if it was Players VS bad monsters/ Knights..etc now that would have my attention compleatly and change the whole iOS online gaming world completely!

if the god king was a real person i would kick him in the nuts...

twice i was one sword stroke away from killing him and then he goes on thsi sudden rampage owns and kills me.

also, what happens if you join him?

As gorgeous as this game is, am I the only one who finds this game small and repetitive? I fought about 6 identical battles, messed around with some loot, got my arse kicked by the boss, and started again on 'generation 2' fighting the exact same battles :s it needs some variety or something. Does noone else find this?

There's limits to the awesomeness of games like Infinity Blade and Rage and it's the limited action you can do. The games get really repetitive because of that.

I hope to see more games with superb graphics in 2011 now that the Unreal SDK is out. But I hope they will be more adapted to the limits imposed by the huge graphics involved.

Maybe they could release a true combat game now? Like Mortal Kombat ('11 version) as MK vs DC ran on Unreal 3.

There's limits to the awesomeness of games like Infinity Blade and Rage and it's the limited action you can do. The games get really repetitive because of that.

I hope to see more games with superb graphics in 2011 now that the Unreal SDK is out. But I hope they will be more adapted to the limits imposed by the huge graphics involved.

Maybe they could release a true combat game now? Like Mortal Kombat ('11 version) as MK vs DC ran on Unreal 3.

I think this also has a lot to do with the rush to release Rage and Infinity Blade before the end of the year, plus the budget they had to work with since it's only a mobile platform and it was untested in the marketplace. I'm sure since Infinity Blade got so much money out of this in 4 days, Chair is probably planning something huge for 2012.

Game seems IMO boring and utterly repetitive in the end.

I found it ok it the first time through till I started the 2nd Bloodline, then realised it is literally just the same thing over and over, at the end of the 3rd Bloodline at the moment and I don't think I will be playing it anymore after this.

It looks great for an iOS game, no doubt about that at all, but it is so lacking on any proper content after you have been through it once it seems like a waste of a game when they just change things very slightly for the enemies that in the end don't really matter.

I have no idea if anything changes or if there are any other levels once you've defeated the boss, I am assuming there isn't.

After the awesome game that Shadow Complex was from the same dev, this is just a disappointment to me.

Game seems IMO boring and utterly repetitive in the end.

I found it ok it the first time through till I started the 2nd Bloodline, then realised it is literally just the same thing over and over, at the end of the 3rd Bloodline at the moment and I don't think I will be playing it anymore after this.

It looks great for an iOS game, no doubt about that at all, but it is so lacking on any proper content after you have been through it once it seems like a waste of a game when they just change things very slightly for the enemies that in the end don't really matter.

I have no idea if anything changes or if there are any other levels once you've defeated the boss, I am assuming there isn't.

After the awesome game that Shadow Complex was from the same dev, this is just a disappointment to me.

And it is because of this sentiment, which seems to be the overwhelming majority from what I have read, that I decided to pass on this game. Nice graphics really only go so far for me, well that and the iPad I currently have is my works and not mine, so seemed like a waste of $6 for a device I am not sure how much longer I will have it for.

"The first update to Infinity Blade is due out at some point next week and it'll add a total of five new weapons, five fresh shields, five helmets, a brand new set of armor, and a new foe called the "Marrow Fiend" to the action RPG." (source)

That'll make it slightly less repetitive for a while.

We also have to realize that (aside from the reasons I posted above) that the most successful games on the iOs platform are designed to be digested in 5 minute intervals. That is why games like Angry Birds and Cut the Rope are so incredibly successful. They are made for people on the go who use these games as a distraction between the times they can play their main gaming platforms. Why would someone want to play a 2 hour game on their couch using a mobile device when they could be playing a larger scale game on their ps3, xbox, or pc?

With that said, I currently am playing Puzzle Quest 2 which is a hell of a long game, but it cost $10 rather than $2 or $6. Also gameloft is known for developing mobile games with longer play times, but their individual games aren't as nearly as successful as games like Angry Birds or Cut The Rope.

I think this also has a lot to do with the rush to release Rage and Infinity Blade before the end of the year, plus the budget they had to work with since it's only a mobile platform and it was untested in the marketplace. I'm sure since Infinity Blade got so much money out of this in 4 days, Chair is probably planning something huge for 2012.

Nah, I'm more talking about the limitations in the device itself. It's not just being rushed or not. John Carmack is one of the biggest genius in engine making and he talked a lot about the limitations in Rage: http://toucharcade.com/2010/11/19/john-carmack-on-rage/

One of limitations that you can't do anything about is the maximum storage space required. These games use extra high quality textures.

Despite not having limits on app size, I think that any apps over 1GB is getting unrealistic for the market (Think about the 8GB iPhones).

Rage HD is 1.18GB and Infinity Blade is almost 500MB and will have lot of addons in the coming months.

  • 1 year later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!