[Official] Battlefield: Play4Free


Recommended Posts

Battlefield: Play4Free

Battlefield-Play4Free.jpg

http://battlefield.play4free.com/

From the company who brought you Battlefield: Heros, have now seem to released a more serious free to play Battlefield. By the looks of this new game, it seems to have been based on Battlefield 2 game play. Which will feature true Battlefield Conquest.

It's currently a closed Beta and in order for you to be in for a chance to participate, you will need to register via email on the website.

Key features:

A next-generation free to play Battlefield

32-player all out warfare online

Experiance the careers of a professional soldier

Screen shots:

ss3.jpg

http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac39/CrispPicturez/ss1.jpg

Update:

Gulf of Oman has now been added as a second beta testing map.

Screen shots:

197861_193965950644055_148483665192284_492866_6901808_n.jpg

189161_193965990644051_148483665192284_492867_548905_n.jpg

196562_193966023977381_148483665192284_492868_3895166_n.jpg

199335_193966110644039_148483665192284_492870_3481885_n.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/951180-official-battlefield-play4free/
Share on other sites

Battlefield Heroes was play for free but they made a huge mistake by trying to make into the TF2 of Battlefield, this is more BF2 than anything which is a good thing as other than Desert Combat mod for Battlefield 1942, BF2 is one of the better games of the franchise.

Battlefield Heroes was also browser based that launched game fullscreen, dont see what the problem is?

Not exactly. It had browser integration for launching/updating, but the actual program is an exe that installs to your programs folder.. not some flash/java/html5 game which is what "browser based" implies.

Right and considering its made by the same dev team that made Battlefield Heroes why would they suddenly turn it into a flash/java game?

Browse based just implies that it is configured and launched from a web browser and not launched like a regular game.

Browse based just implies that it is configured and launched from a web browser and not launched like a regular game.

^This

It's like Cloud Computing, where the graphics and stuff are delt with on their side and it's streamed to your PC.

All you need is a PC capable of running like... YouTube.

http://investor.ea.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=527473

Launches november 30th..llooks like bad company meets battlefield 2...hope they dont screw this one up...dice..if your listening..we still want BF3!

That's the launch date of the beta, not the final game :p

Can't wait though :D

Aren't you bored of BC2 yet? I'm and it's nice to have an alternative.

And even nicer, when you don't have to pay for it.

i was done with it for a while, but then the last patch they fixed pretty much every beef i had with the game and i'm addicted again.

i was done with it for a while, but then the last patch they fixed pretty much every beef i had with the game and i'm addicted again.

I had no "beef" with the game, so I didn't really cared for the last update. It didn't change for me anything, didn't add new maps, weapons or gameplay modes and as most of my friends already got bored of the game way before me, there was nothing left for me with the game.

Interview with the guy behind it all + game play footage.

IMO, that gameplay looks superb. It looks very PC-centric, which is great -- none some lame knockoff. I love the simplistic HUD, also (I know that's kind of a random comment, but a big pet peeve of mine are overly complicated HUDs).

Without sounding daft, what's the chances of this running on a Revo then? As they do have the ION chipset?

Should definitely be possible. May have to run it at a lower resolution, but I would imagine it would be playable without all the bells and whistles.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!