Windows Phone 7: Why It's a Disaster for Microsoft


Recommended Posts

Youre not being harsh youre coming off as sounding immature and hardly professional. Last time I checked "crap" wasnt a legitimate reason for why something is bad, rather a subjective assessment which if fine but you're trying to couple it with some professional respect which just isnt accorded via forums. I couldnt give a flying toss if you designed the original 'xerox' interface if your critical thinking abilities and basis for argument has been reduced to "crap" then I rate your input no more higher than the next troll.

I already said specifically what I didn't like. Calling it Crap was me summing up my thoughts on the UI. To quote myself:

I don't really know how anyone can like it really. It is just big plain boxes, very large rudimentary icons that represent the software on the phone. And when you open the apps they are very basic as-well. You know what the UI reminds me of, a terminal window from 1985.

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: windows_7_phone_ui_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgm (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: windows_7_phone_ui_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgm (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

And how is a grid of icons that tell you absolutely nothing better than tiles that actually present information? Regardless of the small area to the right of the tiles that is not used (Which is a design choice to convey that there is more information to the right, and IS used when in apps, so it's not unused space), it does allow you to actually SEE some information without having to launch multiple apps just to see what's going on... It's much more usable than IOS...

If I have learned anything from this year's iPad it is that tech junkies and forum crawlers don't have a clue about what will and what won't be a success in the market.

I love my iPhone. I think it is awesome and after playing with plenty of other phones, I will probably stick with that next upgrade. That being said, the WP7's interface knocked my socks off. I thought they did a really good job making it stand out as something unique and not trying to rip off iPhone, Android, or BB. It lacks a lot of features right now, but if MS brings it next year and proves to us that their whole push update system actually works across the various providers and hardware that is available then they will have a force to be reckoned with. They may win me over.

Why does WP7 need to be better then the Iphone to be successful.. I hate that reasoning that if its not the best then it will fail because it goes against the history of electronics. I believe it might have failed if they tried to price their cellphones the same as the Iphone but they are cutting the prices by quite a bit and I think that people will really respond to that..

In Canada: The cheapest of both OS's

16 GB Iphone 4 = $659

16 GB LG Optimus Quantum = $449

The most expensive:

32 GB Iphone 4 : $750

16 GB Samsung Focus : $550

That is a freaking 200 dollar difference on both so please

Please compare cellphones that are at the same price point.

For example:

LG optimus 7 vs the Blackberry bold 9780

Iphone 4 vs the Blackberry torch 9800

Iphone 4 vs the Galaxy Tab

At least in the US, subsidization rules the market. I don't know a single person who pays full price for a phone. No. Everyone gets their phones with 2-year contracts because it is ridiculous to pay the unsubsidized price. You need the service anyway, and here at least the price of the service is the same regardless of subsidized/non-subsidized hardware and contract status. That being said, the price difference between most phones is negligible. The 3x WP7 at AT&T were going for $199 w/ 2-y contract and come with 16GB of internal storage. You can get a 16GB iPhone 4 for the same price.

So

16 GB Samsung Focus: $199

16 GB iPhone 4: $199

That is a freaken 0 dollar difference on both so please

I already said specifically what I didn't like. Calling it Crap was me summing up my thoughts on the UI. To quote myself:

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: http://lh6.ggpht.com....jpg?imgmax=800 (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

Whoever made that image, haven't actually used the phone. The top space is actually used when you scroll. The space on the left is used when you go in a hub/app etc. Criticizing that empty space is like pointing out the icon spacing in iOS / Android is waste of valuable screen estate.

There are various flaws with iOS' UI/functionality as well but since they "nailed it", no one apparently sees them. wastage of lock screen as you mentioned or the stupid notification system or the dumbass calendar that never updates properly or the email client that lacks the basic function of "mark as read", lack of a consistent back button, wasting one whole screen for useless spotlight (especially on older models), should I go on?

If you think lock screen is the only problem with iOS, then you are not looking hard enough.

I already said specifically what I didn't like. Calling it Crap was me summing up my thoughts on the UI. To quote myself:

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: windows_7_phone_ui_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgm (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

I'd recommend that you check out http://pocketnow.com/windows-phone/divine-proportions-why-the-start-page-has-a-big-blank-space-on-the-side for an explanation of what you call "wasted space". BTW, do you also call the space between iOS icons or Android widgets wasted?

You should also have a look for comparison shots of WP7 and an iPhone as they clearly demonstrate WP7's ability to use screen space more efficiently. In many examples, WP7 is able to display at least the same amount of information as the iPhone but with larger fonts in a more readable, touch-friendly layout because all the unnecessary chrome is removed from the UI.

If you prefer the iPhone's clumsy, out-dated app-centric model that forces you to open and close multiple apps to accomplish simple tasks then you are welcome to your opinion. Unnecessary fake wood or metal effects are important to some people in a phone ;) However, it's silly to dismiss WP7 as crap just because you don't understand the UI or don't find it appealing. It's also silly to dismiss the features that it has over the competition just because they don't appeal to you - XBox Live integration may not interest you but it's silly to compare it to Apple's me-too "games centre". Also, there is no Netflix client for Android.

I'd recommend that you check out http://pocketnow.com/windows-phone/divine-proportions-why-the-start-page-has-a-big-blank-space-on-the-side for an explanation of what you call "wasted space". BTW, do you also call the space between iOS icons or Android widgets wasted?

That's a really good write up on the design of WP7. I knew some of the usability reasons for the change, but not the design reasons so to speak. Very interesting.

I really think WP7's going to be huge.

i love my HD7, and i showed my phone to people at work. few of them actually want to get the phone but cant yet because they are on verizon. everyone loves the interface and how everything is smooth and fast. WP7 is a great OS. people that use android have told me that as well. and it just released so im sure they will have new cool things that they will release for the phone. but some people will say the OS sucks even without looking at the phone. its way better than the pics and videos you watch

At least in the US, subsidization rules the market. I don't know a single person who pays full price for a phone. No. Everyone gets their phones with 2-year contracts because it is ridiculous to pay the unsubsidized price. You need the service anyway, and here at least the price of the service is the same regardless of subsidized/non-subsidized hardware and contract status. That being said, the price difference between most phones is negligible. The 3x WP7 at AT&T were going for $199 w/ 2-y contract and come with 16GB of internal storage. You can get a 16GB iPhone 4 for the same price.

So

16 GB Samsung Focus: $199

16 GB iPhone 4: $199

That is a freaken 0 dollar difference on both so please

and what is the monthly minimum price on the iphone plan as opposed to the WP7 phones ? telling half the story doesn't cut it.

and damn I'm glad I live in a country where 12 months is the max you can tie up regular consumers to a plan.

and what is the monthly minimum price on the iphone plan as opposed to the WP7 phones ? telling half the story doesn't cut it.

and damn I'm glad I live in a country where 12 months is the max you can tie up regular consumers to a plan.

They are the same. Only thing about that other quote is that the Samsung Focus is 8GB, not 16GB (I wish it was 16GB)

i love my HD7, and i showed my phone to people at work. few of them actually want to get the phone but cant yet because they are on verizon. everyone loves the interface and how everything is smooth and fast. WP7 is a great OS. people that use android have told me that as well. and it just released so im sure they will have new cool things that they will release for the phone. but some people will say the OS sucks even without looking at the phone. its way better than the pics and videos you watch

Yeah, I'm in the same boat waiting for the OS to come to Verizon. Hopefully soon...

Yeah, I'm in the same boat waiting for the OS to come to Verizon. Hopefully soon...

It shouldn't take long it seems, more info poping up that hints at January or Feb at the most for CDMA.

WP7 has the greatest UI of all time. The metro UI is incredibly elegant and productive.On the other hand iOS UI is the fugliest UI possible. I feel sick every time I look at the crappy iPhone home screen. Bottom line is, WP7 is gonna destroy iPhone within a few years, just like Windows destroyed Mac OS.

I ordered the LG Optimus 7 in Canada and they sent me 2 by accident... and only charged me for 1!!.. hurray

maybe Microsoft is rewarding me for not buying a smartphone until this point..

Lol. I'm in Victoria too. Give it to me!! :laugh:

<img>

Rumors are still going around about the January update, if even half of these things come true we're talking a pretty big upgrade to, more of a 7.1 than a 7.0.1 type thing in the end.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of Logitech's best productivity mice is now available for just $79.99 by Taras Buria The MX Master 3S, formerly Logitech's flagship productivity mouse, is now available at an all-time low price during Prime Day sale. Thanks to the latest discount, you can have this mouse for as little as $79.99. This large-sized mouse has many things to like. From its ergonomic shape to the iconic MagScroll wheel, the MX Master 3S is a great productivity-focused accessory. It has an 8K DPI sensor that tracks on various surfaces, including glass. Its main MagScroll has two modes: ratched and infinite, with the latter capable of scrolling up to 1,000 lines in just a second. Additionally, there is a secondary wheel for horizontal scrolling. The MX Master 3S has plenty of buttons, which can be remapped to gestures, keyboard shortcuts, or other actions in the Options+ app on Windows and macOS. You can connect the mouse to up to three devices (via Bluetooth or the Bolt connector) and switch between them with a dedicated button. You also get a USB Type-A to Type-C cable to recharge the built-in battery, which lasts up to 70 days on a full charge, and a quick one-minute charge gets you three hours of use. Logitech MX Master 3S - $79.99 | 20% off for Prime Members Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Exactly, this is just the beginning. I hope that by that time, our inept politicians devise something like a Universal Basic Income, because unemployment and poverty rates will skyrocket otherwise. And believe me, robots that perform physical work aren't a matter of IF, but WHEN. No career is truly safe from AI/robots, it's just a matter of time.
    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!