Windows Phone 7: Why It's a Disaster for Microsoft


Recommended Posts

Youre not being harsh youre coming off as sounding immature and hardly professional. Last time I checked "crap" wasnt a legitimate reason for why something is bad, rather a subjective assessment which if fine but you're trying to couple it with some professional respect which just isnt accorded via forums. I couldnt give a flying toss if you designed the original 'xerox' interface if your critical thinking abilities and basis for argument has been reduced to "crap" then I rate your input no more higher than the next troll.

I already said specifically what I didn't like. Calling it Crap was me summing up my thoughts on the UI. To quote myself:

I don't really know how anyone can like it really. It is just big plain boxes, very large rudimentary icons that represent the software on the phone. And when you open the apps they are very basic as-well. You know what the UI reminds me of, a terminal window from 1985.

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: windows_7_phone_ui_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgm (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: windows_7_phone_ui_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgm (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

And how is a grid of icons that tell you absolutely nothing better than tiles that actually present information? Regardless of the small area to the right of the tiles that is not used (Which is a design choice to convey that there is more information to the right, and IS used when in apps, so it's not unused space), it does allow you to actually SEE some information without having to launch multiple apps just to see what's going on... It's much more usable than IOS...

If I have learned anything from this year's iPad it is that tech junkies and forum crawlers don't have a clue about what will and what won't be a success in the market.

I love my iPhone. I think it is awesome and after playing with plenty of other phones, I will probably stick with that next upgrade. That being said, the WP7's interface knocked my socks off. I thought they did a really good job making it stand out as something unique and not trying to rip off iPhone, Android, or BB. It lacks a lot of features right now, but if MS brings it next year and proves to us that their whole push update system actually works across the various providers and hardware that is available then they will have a force to be reckoned with. They may win me over.

Why does WP7 need to be better then the Iphone to be successful.. I hate that reasoning that if its not the best then it will fail because it goes against the history of electronics. I believe it might have failed if they tried to price their cellphones the same as the Iphone but they are cutting the prices by quite a bit and I think that people will really respond to that..

In Canada: The cheapest of both OS's

16 GB Iphone 4 = $659

16 GB LG Optimus Quantum = $449

The most expensive:

32 GB Iphone 4 : $750

16 GB Samsung Focus : $550

That is a freaking 200 dollar difference on both so please

Please compare cellphones that are at the same price point.

For example:

LG optimus 7 vs the Blackberry bold 9780

Iphone 4 vs the Blackberry torch 9800

Iphone 4 vs the Galaxy Tab

At least in the US, subsidization rules the market. I don't know a single person who pays full price for a phone. No. Everyone gets their phones with 2-year contracts because it is ridiculous to pay the unsubsidized price. You need the service anyway, and here at least the price of the service is the same regardless of subsidized/non-subsidized hardware and contract status. That being said, the price difference between most phones is negligible. The 3x WP7 at AT&T were going for $199 w/ 2-y contract and come with 16GB of internal storage. You can get a 16GB iPhone 4 for the same price.

So

16 GB Samsung Focus: $199

16 GB iPhone 4: $199

That is a freaken 0 dollar difference on both so please

I already said specifically what I didn't like. Calling it Crap was me summing up my thoughts on the UI. To quote myself:

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: http://lh6.ggpht.com....jpg?imgmax=800 (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

Whoever made that image, haven't actually used the phone. The top space is actually used when you scroll. The space on the left is used when you go in a hub/app etc. Criticizing that empty space is like pointing out the icon spacing in iOS / Android is waste of valuable screen estate.

There are various flaws with iOS' UI/functionality as well but since they "nailed it", no one apparently sees them. wastage of lock screen as you mentioned or the stupid notification system or the dumbass calendar that never updates properly or the email client that lacks the basic function of "mark as read", lack of a consistent back button, wasting one whole screen for useless spotlight (especially on older models), should I go on?

If you think lock screen is the only problem with iOS, then you are not looking hard enough.

I already said specifically what I didn't like. Calling it Crap was me summing up my thoughts on the UI. To quote myself:

And I'm pretty sure everyone you idealise has used words that are more than a feeling to dismiss things that are poor in quality. Not of all of us 'critical thinkers' have time to sugar coat our opinions.

One problem with handheld devices is they have small screens but they are now more than ever expected to provide the user with coupulous amounts of information. Each year the amount of data users want to see increases. Facebook updates, Twitter updates, Phone Calls, Emails, Calender Events. Just to name a few. And well.. jsut look at this wasted space: windows_7_phone_ui_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgm (I didn't make this image)

I'm not a fan of this approach, I think that iOS nailed it and the only thing that iOS really needs to make it truely great is to add a proper lock screen that displays 'at a glance' information. Things users need to unlock the phone and launch an app to see. And I think Apple can do that, I don't think that Microsoft can fix the problems with Windows Phone 7's UI because they don't think they are problems they think they are assets.

I think Windows Phone 7 will end up being a failuer. Simple as that. You can call me a troll all you like.

I'd recommend that you check out http://pocketnow.com/windows-phone/divine-proportions-why-the-start-page-has-a-big-blank-space-on-the-side for an explanation of what you call "wasted space". BTW, do you also call the space between iOS icons or Android widgets wasted?

You should also have a look for comparison shots of WP7 and an iPhone as they clearly demonstrate WP7's ability to use screen space more efficiently. In many examples, WP7 is able to display at least the same amount of information as the iPhone but with larger fonts in a more readable, touch-friendly layout because all the unnecessary chrome is removed from the UI.

If you prefer the iPhone's clumsy, out-dated app-centric model that forces you to open and close multiple apps to accomplish simple tasks then you are welcome to your opinion. Unnecessary fake wood or metal effects are important to some people in a phone ;) However, it's silly to dismiss WP7 as crap just because you don't understand the UI or don't find it appealing. It's also silly to dismiss the features that it has over the competition just because they don't appeal to you - XBox Live integration may not interest you but it's silly to compare it to Apple's me-too "games centre". Also, there is no Netflix client for Android.

I'd recommend that you check out http://pocketnow.com/windows-phone/divine-proportions-why-the-start-page-has-a-big-blank-space-on-the-side for an explanation of what you call "wasted space". BTW, do you also call the space between iOS icons or Android widgets wasted?

That's a really good write up on the design of WP7. I knew some of the usability reasons for the change, but not the design reasons so to speak. Very interesting.

I really think WP7's going to be huge.

i love my HD7, and i showed my phone to people at work. few of them actually want to get the phone but cant yet because they are on verizon. everyone loves the interface and how everything is smooth and fast. WP7 is a great OS. people that use android have told me that as well. and it just released so im sure they will have new cool things that they will release for the phone. but some people will say the OS sucks even without looking at the phone. its way better than the pics and videos you watch

At least in the US, subsidization rules the market. I don't know a single person who pays full price for a phone. No. Everyone gets their phones with 2-year contracts because it is ridiculous to pay the unsubsidized price. You need the service anyway, and here at least the price of the service is the same regardless of subsidized/non-subsidized hardware and contract status. That being said, the price difference between most phones is negligible. The 3x WP7 at AT&T were going for $199 w/ 2-y contract and come with 16GB of internal storage. You can get a 16GB iPhone 4 for the same price.

So

16 GB Samsung Focus: $199

16 GB iPhone 4: $199

That is a freaken 0 dollar difference on both so please

and what is the monthly minimum price on the iphone plan as opposed to the WP7 phones ? telling half the story doesn't cut it.

and damn I'm glad I live in a country where 12 months is the max you can tie up regular consumers to a plan.

and what is the monthly minimum price on the iphone plan as opposed to the WP7 phones ? telling half the story doesn't cut it.

and damn I'm glad I live in a country where 12 months is the max you can tie up regular consumers to a plan.

They are the same. Only thing about that other quote is that the Samsung Focus is 8GB, not 16GB (I wish it was 16GB)

i love my HD7, and i showed my phone to people at work. few of them actually want to get the phone but cant yet because they are on verizon. everyone loves the interface and how everything is smooth and fast. WP7 is a great OS. people that use android have told me that as well. and it just released so im sure they will have new cool things that they will release for the phone. but some people will say the OS sucks even without looking at the phone. its way better than the pics and videos you watch

Yeah, I'm in the same boat waiting for the OS to come to Verizon. Hopefully soon...

Yeah, I'm in the same boat waiting for the OS to come to Verizon. Hopefully soon...

It shouldn't take long it seems, more info poping up that hints at January or Feb at the most for CDMA.

WP7 has the greatest UI of all time. The metro UI is incredibly elegant and productive.On the other hand iOS UI is the fugliest UI possible. I feel sick every time I look at the crappy iPhone home screen. Bottom line is, WP7 is gonna destroy iPhone within a few years, just like Windows destroyed Mac OS.

I ordered the LG Optimus 7 in Canada and they sent me 2 by accident... and only charged me for 1!!.. hurray

maybe Microsoft is rewarding me for not buying a smartphone until this point..

Lol. I'm in Victoria too. Give it to me!! :laugh:

<img>

Rumors are still going around about the January update, if even half of these things come true we're talking a pretty big upgrade to, more of a 7.1 than a 7.0.1 type thing in the end.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No, size is not the only selling point. I did not even remotely say that. Your claim was that "building your own will be faster and cheaper". This is false. You cannot build something close to that form factor with off-the-shelf parts. You can build a Mini-ITX PC and pay more, or something larger and pay less. But these are different market segments. It's apples and oranges.
    • There is a default resolution setting in Settings > Display that can be changed with a click. You can also change the settings on a per-game basis. No CLI needed. Also, Steam has countless games that are not "[perpetual] alpha/beta games", so no need for the straw man. Plus you can use other stores as well. And console games (e.g. PS5) cost a fortune, which itself more than negates the price subsidy on the system, unless you plan on exclusively playing 1 or 2 games. It's true that you shouldn't buy a system that doesn't support the game(s) you want to play, but I think that's kinda obvious, and applies to every console as well as PC. I don't game in the living room and have no need of a Steam Machine, but there is a clear market segment that would find it useful.
    • RSS Guard 5.2.0 by Razvan Serea RSS Guard is a simple (yet powerful) feed reader. It is able to fetch the most known feed formats, including RSS/RDF and ATOM. It's free, it's open-source. RSS Guard currently supports Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian. RSS Guard will never depend on other services - this includes online news aggregators like Feedly, The Old Reader and others. RSS Guard is developed on top of the Qt library and it supports these operating systems: Windows GNU/Linux OS/2 (eComStation) Mac OS X xBSD (possibly) Android (possibly) other platforms supported by Qt The core features of RSS Guard are: support for online feed synchronization via plugins, Tiny Tiny RSS (from RSS Guard 3.0.0). multiplatform, support for all feed formats, simplicity, import/export of feeds to/from OPML 2.0, downloader with own tab and support for up to 6 parallel downloads, message filter with regular expressions, feed metadata fetching including icons, simple Adblock functionality, customized popup notifications, Google-based auto-completion for internal web browser location bar, ability to cleanup internal message database with various options, enhanced feed auto-updating with separate time intervals, multiple data backend support, SQLite (in-memory DBs too), MySQL. is able to specify target database by its name (MySQL backend), “portable” mode support with clever auto-detection, feed categorization, drap-n-drop for feed list, automatic checking for updates, ability to discover existing feeds on websites, full support of podcasts (both RSS & ATOM), ability to backup/restore database or settings, fully-featured recycle bin, printing of messages and any web pages, can be fully controlled via keyboard, feed authentication (Digest-MD5, BASIC, NTLM-2), handles tons of messages & feeds, sweet look & feel, fully adjustable toolbars (changeable buttons and style), ability to check for updates on all platforms + self-updating on Windows, hideable main menu, toolbars and list headers, KFeanza-based default icon theme + ability to create your own icon themes, fully skinnable user interface + ability to create your own skins, “newspaper” view, plenty of skins, support for "feed://" URI scheme, ability to hide list of feeds/categories, open-source development model based on GNU GPL license, version 3, tabbed interface, integrated web browser with adjustable behavior + external browser support, internal web browser mouse gestures support, desktop integration via tray icon, localizations to some languages, Qt library is the only dependency, open-source development model and friendly author waiting for your feedback, no ads, no hidden costs. RSS Guard 5.2.0 changelog: Added: Feed auto-fetch can now also be delayed while Feral GameMode is active on Linux and startup auto-fetch is skipped when GameMode is already active. (#2265) WebEngine builds can now use RSS Guard generated proxy auto-config (PAC) rules so article/web browsing follows per-account and per-feed proxy settings more closely. (#2273) Generated PAC rules now also cover related subdomains and use Public Suffix List data, so feeds such as feeds.bbc.co.uk can also proxy resources from images.bbc.co.uk. (#2273) Standard feeds can now define extra proxy domains, useful when article images, stylesheets or other page resources are loaded from a CDN or another domain that should use the same feed proxy. (#2273) RSS Guard now asks for proxy credentials when a WebEngine page needs proxy authentication and can fill credentials from the current feed proxy when available. (#2273) Network settings again include an option to ignore all cookies, which clears stored cookies and prevents new cookies from being accepted. Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now individually ignore cookies while downloading feed data. Stored cookies can now be deleted from the Tools menu. Custom skin colors can now override the feed list article count color separately from feed titles, including a separate highlighted color. (#2275) Settings dialog can now search across available settings and highlight matching controls. (#1754) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now optionally be reported as broken when they are valid but contain no articles. (#2039) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now override the application-wide feed connection timeout per feed. (#1023) Tray icon can now use a custom background color and unread-count text color, with an option to reuse the generated icon as the application icon. (#1973) Support for more benevolent parsing of Gemlog entries (#2295). Article list can now show when an article was received by RSS Guard. (#947) Feed deep discovery now actually scrapes all links found in the website and checks if they are feeds or not. This greatly enhances usability of the deep discovery mode and discovers many more feeds than before. (#2306) Search boxes now show a small dot when the feed or article list is hiding some items because of active filtering. (#873) Articles now have a shortcut-assignable action to open the homepage of the feed they belong to. (#2060) Fixed: Parallel feed updates no longer crash when multiple update results are processed at the same time. (64cf521) Links in WebEngine articles opened from feeds such as Kill the Newsletter now open correctly instead of being swallowed by the embedded page. (#2272) Relative article URLs resolution was kinda broken. (#2282) Clicking article URL did not work when the URL had "fragment" set. (#2293) The default proxy setting now uses Qt/system default proxy behavior instead of forcing no proxy. (e0263ad) WebEngine article loading now keeps the current feed context, so feed-specific proxy credentials remain available while the article page loads. (fdd0f00) Download: RSS Guard 5.2.0 (64-bit) | Portable | ~ 130.0 MB (Open Source) Link: RSS Guard Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This is gonna separate the creeps from the rest of the crowd.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!