Recommended Posts

The "free" argument is silly anyway. If Microsoft wanted you to have it, they would have made it available to you. They didn't. In other words, it is not free. It's not even available to you.

If Microsoft doesn't want things to leak they should hold on to it more careful.

If Microsoft doesn't want things to leak they should hold on to it more careful.

When you have beta testers, you can only hope they will stick to their NDA. Some do, some don't. Depending on the product, Microsoft does track down people who breach their NDA. An example? The AOE online alpha. Some people leaked information (ie what the game was, screenshots etc), they got:

1. Banned from Xbox live.

2. Banned from Windows Live.

3. MS were looking into legal action.

For a product like IE? I don't think MS really cares...since you can just take the PP7 engine and throw it into the first IE9 beta and you would get the exact same thing as this. Plus everyone already knows about it anyways.

Microsoft have to also be quite open about what they do, since a lot of major corporations / businesses rely on their product...surprise launches won't generally go down well for them.

Exactly, Microsoft knows when giving betas out to developers there's a good chance it will make it into the internet. It's a calculated risk. If they really don't want something to leak they should hold on to it. Or give it to an extremely limited amount of people they are in direct contact with and can be trusted for sure.

I was under the impression that both linking to and discussing pirated software was against the forum rules!

Yes. It's illegal to distribute anything that is copyrighted without permission from the copyright holder. If I create a program and make it available for free on my website, it would still be illegal for you to make it available somewhere else. I'm allowed to do so because I hold the copyright, but you have no such right. Price has zero relevance.

Oh, I know. Piracy has always been okay when it comes to Microsoft products, really. It's just funny.

richdiesslin_downloadin.gif

Alright...

1. Microsoft is VERY unlikely to take action against Neowin over a build leak of IE9. What's more likely is that someone on the IE team will throw a chair out the window.

2. To the OP, and various other Italian/Spanish/Portuguese/whatever twaddle people who rely on the Russians to get their ****: THEY ARE NOT CALLED 'VIP TESTERS'. Why can't you refer to them appropriately as TAP/OEMs/partners?

Anyway, about to try out the build but I hear that the rendering engine is much improved from the beta, so if a site didn't render correctly in the official release it may here. :)

2. To the OP, and various other Italian/Spanish/Portuguese/whatever twaddle people who rely on the Russians to get their ****: THEY ARE NOT CALLED 'VIP TESTERS'. Why can't you refer to them appropriately as TAP/OEMs/partners?

You forgot Test Pilots ;)

I have problems with this release. While on Facebook, browser just hang and freeze.

Anyone else with this problem?

In the internet explorer options, click that reset to defaults button and let it clean itself up. That usually fixes this symptom for me.

The fact is spellchecking is quite a basic feature and ie9 is the only browser that does not have it, I think the majority would love to have spellcheck.

Unfortunately every bug requesting a spell checker on connect was closed "by design" :(

Time to start making my "Features removed in IE9" list if the UI and customizability are not going to change.

You could customize IE? Really? Since when?

I mean apart from adding / removing a few buttons in IE6 and before, most versions of IE have had very little customizability. Firefox, chrome and Opera are the browsers that you can really customize (firefox being the best in that area of course).

So far so good, it's been working fine for me. The sites i've visted have worked well, haven't noticed any problems with any. You know, if MS doesn't add a spellchecker like everyone wants they still let a 3rd party add it. IE7pro has had one for years, it also does lots of other things that IE7 didn't do back when it came out. I expect a IE9pro of sorts to show up later on, I don't know why MS won't just add one, they could take the one out of Office and use that I guess.

This build is looking look to me. It's seems more responsive than the beta. I wish it did have a spellchecker though, and Microsoft won't give IE9 very much customizability, just like previous versions of Internet Explorer.

Anyway, about to try out the build but I hear that the rendering engine is much improved from the beta, so if a site didn't render correctly in the official release it may here. :)

Yup. I'm seeing better rendering and stability on many sites. I found the initial beta quite crashy on some sites (Facebook, Windows Live Mail) but this seems to have been resolved. Very snappy build. It will definitely tide me over until the RC :)

The Aero busy cursor now keeps spinning correctly in the tab until the page loading is truly complete. I still need a proper progress bar.

Yeah, this is really the only major difference I see. I scanned it with SuperAntiSpyware, MBAM and Comodo Internet Security - it's clean (I can guarantee only about the x64 file from the original link). And I also had to restart after installing, 'cause "some files" were in use or something. Feels a bit slower I guess, but not sure, gotta clean temp files and cookies and test again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reluctantly forces strict new age checks on Texas users starting today by Paul Hill Apple will begin enforcing the Texas Age Assurance Law (SB 2420) following a recent court ruling that lifted an injunction on SB 2420. Starting June 4 (today), Apple will enforce strict age-verification and parental-consent rules for new Apple accounts created in Texas. This move will affect children under 18 who go to download apps or attempt to make in-app purchases. Apple previously expressed privacy concerns related to this law, but compliance is now mandatory for the company, nevertheless. Apple will use several APIs to follow the law. Principally, the Declared Age Range API will fetch the specific user age bracket (Under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18+) and a verification method. The Significant Change API (PermissionKit) will trigger a system dialog for parental consent if an app gets a major update or an age-rating shift. There is also a new property type in StoreKit that allows developers to automatically check when their app’s age rating has changed on a user’s device and then use the Significant Change API to request parental consent. Finally, App Store Server Notifications can be configured to tell developers when a parent revokes consent, blocking app launches. To ensure they are ready for these changes, developers must immediately use Apple’s sandbox testing environment to validate these APIs in their apps. For any developers out there finding this to be inconvenient, get used to it. Other regions, such as Utah, Louisiana, and Brazil, are looking at, or have implemented, similar rules.
    • They should show the onedrive recycle bin in a searchable manner and on app not just on the website
    • You looking at a phone or something? On my 4K HDR monitor it is frikking spectacular.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      61
    5. 5
      neufuse
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!