Recommended Posts

The "free" argument is silly anyway. If Microsoft wanted you to have it, they would have made it available to you. They didn't. In other words, it is not free. It's not even available to you.

If Microsoft doesn't want things to leak they should hold on to it more careful.

If Microsoft doesn't want things to leak they should hold on to it more careful.

When you have beta testers, you can only hope they will stick to their NDA. Some do, some don't. Depending on the product, Microsoft does track down people who breach their NDA. An example? The AOE online alpha. Some people leaked information (ie what the game was, screenshots etc), they got:

1. Banned from Xbox live.

2. Banned from Windows Live.

3. MS were looking into legal action.

For a product like IE? I don't think MS really cares...since you can just take the PP7 engine and throw it into the first IE9 beta and you would get the exact same thing as this. Plus everyone already knows about it anyways.

Microsoft have to also be quite open about what they do, since a lot of major corporations / businesses rely on their product...surprise launches won't generally go down well for them.

Exactly, Microsoft knows when giving betas out to developers there's a good chance it will make it into the internet. It's a calculated risk. If they really don't want something to leak they should hold on to it. Or give it to an extremely limited amount of people they are in direct contact with and can be trusted for sure.

I was under the impression that both linking to and discussing pirated software was against the forum rules!

Yes. It's illegal to distribute anything that is copyrighted without permission from the copyright holder. If I create a program and make it available for free on my website, it would still be illegal for you to make it available somewhere else. I'm allowed to do so because I hold the copyright, but you have no such right. Price has zero relevance.

Oh, I know. Piracy has always been okay when it comes to Microsoft products, really. It's just funny.

richdiesslin_downloadin.gif

Alright...

1. Microsoft is VERY unlikely to take action against Neowin over a build leak of IE9. What's more likely is that someone on the IE team will throw a chair out the window.

2. To the OP, and various other Italian/Spanish/Portuguese/whatever twaddle people who rely on the Russians to get their ****: THEY ARE NOT CALLED 'VIP TESTERS'. Why can't you refer to them appropriately as TAP/OEMs/partners?

Anyway, about to try out the build but I hear that the rendering engine is much improved from the beta, so if a site didn't render correctly in the official release it may here. :)

2. To the OP, and various other Italian/Spanish/Portuguese/whatever twaddle people who rely on the Russians to get their ****: THEY ARE NOT CALLED 'VIP TESTERS'. Why can't you refer to them appropriately as TAP/OEMs/partners?

You forgot Test Pilots ;)

I have problems with this release. While on Facebook, browser just hang and freeze.

Anyone else with this problem?

In the internet explorer options, click that reset to defaults button and let it clean itself up. That usually fixes this symptom for me.

The fact is spellchecking is quite a basic feature and ie9 is the only browser that does not have it, I think the majority would love to have spellcheck.

Unfortunately every bug requesting a spell checker on connect was closed "by design" :(

Time to start making my "Features removed in IE9" list if the UI and customizability are not going to change.

You could customize IE? Really? Since when?

I mean apart from adding / removing a few buttons in IE6 and before, most versions of IE have had very little customizability. Firefox, chrome and Opera are the browsers that you can really customize (firefox being the best in that area of course).

So far so good, it's been working fine for me. The sites i've visted have worked well, haven't noticed any problems with any. You know, if MS doesn't add a spellchecker like everyone wants they still let a 3rd party add it. IE7pro has had one for years, it also does lots of other things that IE7 didn't do back when it came out. I expect a IE9pro of sorts to show up later on, I don't know why MS won't just add one, they could take the one out of Office and use that I guess.

This build is looking look to me. It's seems more responsive than the beta. I wish it did have a spellchecker though, and Microsoft won't give IE9 very much customizability, just like previous versions of Internet Explorer.

Anyway, about to try out the build but I hear that the rendering engine is much improved from the beta, so if a site didn't render correctly in the official release it may here. :)

Yup. I'm seeing better rendering and stability on many sites. I found the initial beta quite crashy on some sites (Facebook, Windows Live Mail) but this seems to have been resolved. Very snappy build. It will definitely tide me over until the RC :)

The Aero busy cursor now keeps spinning correctly in the tab until the page loading is truly complete. I still need a proper progress bar.

Yeah, this is really the only major difference I see. I scanned it with SuperAntiSpyware, MBAM and Comodo Internet Security - it's clean (I can guarantee only about the x64 file from the original link). And I also had to restart after installing, 'cause "some files" were in use or something. Feels a bit slower I guess, but not sure, gotta clean temp files and cookies and test again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ladybird Browser is no longer accepting outside contributions thanks to AI by David Uzondu The Ladybird Browser Project has announced it will no longer accept public pull requests and will limit changes to those made by its maintainers as it works towards its first alpha release. According to Ladybird's creator Andreas Kling, this is "not a change we make lightly," but the rapid shift in AI capabilities forced their hand. Previously, a massive PR implied that the person behind it put a lot of care into the code and is ready to "answer for the consequences." Now with AI, anyone can generate a PR without even understanding the bug fix or feature they want merged. The blog post goes on to say that the team is closing all open public pull requests immediately, and that maintainers will not treat external forks as a review queue for upstream Ladybird. Instead, the team wants outside contributors to focus on reporting bugs and running tests. Kling started Ladybird back in 2019 as LibHTML, a simple HTML viewer for his hobby operating system, SerenityOS, but by September 2022, it had turned into a full-fledged browser project. What sets Ladybird apart from the likes of Google Chrome, Apple Safari, or Mozilla Firefox is its totally independent engine, which does not rely on pre-existing codebases. The project maintains a strict policy against default search engine deals or user data monetization, keeping development funded entirely by donations and sponsorships. Generative AI is forcing open source project maintainers to rethink how they handle public code contributions (and the whole open-source thing in general). One month ago, a leak about the National Health Service (NHS) suggested the organization was planning to take all of its public repositories private ahead of a May 11 deadline, thanks to Mythos (an AI model that Anthropic believes is too dangerous to be released to the public) and its ability to find and write exploits for zero-day vulnerabilities. Thankfully, the Government Digital Service (GDS) issued a counter-report titled "AI, open code and vulnerability risk in the public sector" that stopped the shutdown by pointing out that hiding code does not improve security.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.4 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.4 changelog: Fixed an issue where color picking could occasionally freeze Improved capture stability Resolved a possible unexpected app shutdown in certain cases Refined internal handling for a smoother experience Download: Kalmuri 4.2.4 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.4 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      81
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!