Verizon 4G LTE Telecon Coverage


Recommended Posts

Verizon held a teleconference today at 12pm eastern time to discuss the release of their 4G network.

Here are the minutes of the conference:

allGeek.tv Covered this live starting at 12:00PM EST.

12:06PM – Tony Melone starts off by talking about the Verizon Wireless innovation center.

12:07 – Talks about the first 4g network of its size, and kind. On December 5th Verizon’s 4g LTE network will start by covering 1/3 of Americans most of I-95 in the southeast part of the country, Miami, San Francisco, So. California with L.A. being the largest (over 20,000,000 ). Plans to cover most of the country by 2013

12:11 – 4g will be the launching pad for mobile technology for the next 10 yrs. According to Tony.

12:13 – Enhances 3g, and helps them promote their strategy. Same people who built 3g helped build the 4g network.

12:14 – Talks about transfer rates of 5-12mbps down and 2mbps upstream. Other technologies can’t compare to the latency of 4g LTE. Two data plans will be launched initally. 5gb – $40.00/mo 10gb – $80.00/mo. Both plans will allow up to 10gb of overage at $10 per gb of data.

12:17 – Devices at initial launch will be LG, and Pantech. Both will be 4g LTE usb modems with 3g backwards capability.

12:19 – Tony Melone thanks everyone, and a BIG thank you to LG.

This is an interesting step forward. It will be exciting to see cell companies slowly start switching to 4G, and should change the way we use our mobile devices forever.

Source: http://www.allgeek.tv

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/957646-verizon-4g-lte-telecon-coverage/
Share on other sites

so it is mobile plan after all

i would take it anyday for that price point

except that i am in not in america

I still have a bug bear about LTE and WiMax being called 4G though.

while true

but that what is actually '3.9G'

is compatible with the true 4G 'LTE advance' network

12:14 – Talks about transfer rates of 5-12mbps down and 2mbps upstream. Other technologies can’t compare to the latency of 4g LTE. Two data plans will be launched initally. 5gb – $40.00/mo 10gb – $80.00/mo. Both plans will allow up to 10gb of overage at $10 per gb of data.

Lol. Ah at the things wrong in that comment.

1. T-mobile manages to get 8mbps on their new HSPA+ network, and that isn't even the latest HSPA+ spec. Sprint's WiMAX has gotten anywhere between 5mbps and 14mbps, depending on your location.

2. LTE isn't 4G, it's 3.9g.

3. $40 a month for 5gb? Sprint's WiMAX network (for USB dongles) is $45 a month for unlimited data. T-Mobile's HSPA+ is $25 a month for unlimited data. What a ****ing ripoff.

Lol. Ah at the things wrong in that comment.

1. T-mobile manages to get 8mbps on their new HSPA+ network, and that isn't even the latest HSPA+ spec. Sprint's WiMAX has gotten anywhere between 5mbps and 14mbps, depending on your location.

2. LTE isn't 4G, it's 3.9g.

3. $40 a month for 5gb? Sprint's WiMAX network (for USB dongles) is $45 a month for unlimited data. T-Mobile's HSPA+ is $25 a month for unlimited data. What a ****ing ripoff.

It probably cost Verizon alot more than T-Mobile to install the infrastructure. LTE is more advanced from a technological point of view and so requires more new hardware than upgrading to HSDA+ would.

The bigger issue is also that Verizon is a CDMA network so there's a lot to install for GSM too. Overall, the cost of it I'm sure was pretty high they need to make that money back somehow.

While the pricing may be a valid issue of debate, I think the speeds that people are going to supposedly get arent that bad. People who check this forum are more apt to have faster internet, but I know people who still have 5mpbs internet in their houses. Getting 5-12mpbs while driving down the interstate on your laptop or cell phone is going to be pretty cool.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary to compete against AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update bug that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      593
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!