Recommended Posts

Very cool app indeed!

It doesnt work in gmail though?

Which section of Gmail are you experiencing an issue with ? I just ran a quick test and hit the Compose link, Speckie was active in the text fields. If you find a field not working, try clicking outside of it and then back into it.

Which section of Gmail are you experiencing an issue with ? I just ran a quick test and hit the Compose link, Speckie was active in the text fields. If you find a field not working, try clicking outside of it and then back into it.

Yep compose section, and clicking outside didnt help. I am on ie 9 rc.

Thanks for the fix with the dictionaries, it does work.

I still have the issue with it crashing IE when opening new tabs.

The issue wasn't present in the pre 1.4 builds.

IE 64, win 7 HP 64.

thanks

Do you have an antivirus installed ? Do you have a specific home page set ? If so, what's the address ? I'm trying to reproduce the issue but not succeeding.

Do you have an antivirus installed ? Do you have a specific home page set ? If so, what's the address ? I'm trying to reproduce the issue but not succeeding.

Have Microsoft Security Essentials installed, bing.com is my homepage, it just crashes on the new tab page.

Anything else I could do to help?

EDIT: It also crashes when I open a link in a new tab. Its definately Speckie as well cos when I disable it there is no problem.

I just learned about Speckie today and am very interested in it. But I have tried it on two machines and get the same error while installing: C:\Users\Bill\AppData\Roaming\Speckie\Speckie32.dll failed to register. HRESULT -2147010895.

Both machines are running Windows7 64-bit, one with Home Premium, one Professional. One machine is running IE9RC, the other IE8.

BTW - there is another very good real-time spell checker that works fine with IE9. It is the one included in IE7Pro.

@Bill_Bright, sounds like you may be missing the VC runtimes, you can download them here from microsoft: x86, x64 Be sure to install both of them.

I've tried ie7pro in the past and found its spell check implementation to be incomplete. Their forum is also littered with spam and there's no communication from the developers. I don't trust it on my box.

I've tried ie7pro in the past and found its spell check implementation to be incomplete. Their forum is also littered with spam and there's no communication from the developers. I don't trust it on my box.
Well, it is trustworthy, and the checker works great. But you are right about the rest and that is exactly why I have been looking for good alternative.

Now I have to admit, I am hesitant to install those two VC runtimes. These machines were built new with Win7, after those runtimes came out. It seems odd I should need them now.

Now I have to admit, I am hesitant to install those two VC runtimes. These machines were built new with Win7, after those runtimes came out. It seems odd I should need them now.

For a trusting person you don't seem that comfortable installing legitimate Microsoft binaries! :laugh:

Windows 7, like older versions of windows, doesn't come with every VB runtime that was released. Programs that get installed generally put them in, you must've been (un?)lucky not to need them for anything you've installed yet.

Just put them in, Speckie needs them and/or you'll need them down the track anyway.

Might be worth putting them in the installer just in case! :)

Well, it is trustworthy, and the checker works great. But you are right about the rest and that is exactly why I have been looking for good alternative.

Now I have to admit, I am hesitant to install those two VC runtimes. These machines were built new with Win7, after those runtimes came out. It seems odd I should need them now.

My experience with the checker is it doesn't work so great. It's the reason I wrote Speckie. Try this; after it has highlighted a word as misspelt, go back and edit it manually.

As for the VC runtimes, they're required by applications written in Microsoft Visual C++ 2008, they're standard binaries that at one time or other will get installed on your system by other applications. They do not come as standard with a Windows install. I don't include them with the installer because most people have them installed by now.

[edit]Basically, what Raa said :p [/edit]

As for the VC runtimes, they're required by applications written in Microsoft Visual C++ 2008, they're standard binaries that at one time or other will get installed on your system by other applications. They do not come as standard with a Windows install. I don't include them with the installer because most people have them installed by now.

I'm pretty sure I've seen installers which don't include the VC runtimes, but give the option of downloading and installing them for you. That might be something to consider.

For a trusting person you don't seem that comfortable installing legitimate Microsoft binaries!
Oh, I'm not trusting at all and I am not apologetic about it.

FTR, I just installed it on a 3rd system, also running Win7 64-bit with IE9RC and it seems to be working fine. And I did not need to install anything from MS.

Oh, I'm not trusting at all and I am not apologetic about it.

FTR, I just installed it on a 3rd system, also running Win7 64-bit with IE9RC and it seems to be working fine. And I did not need to install anything from MS.

That's because that 3rd system had the VC++ Runtime binaries installed by another application that was installed. I'll take care of this issue in the next release.

That's because that 3rd system had the VC++ Runtime binaries installed by another application that was installed.
Well, I'm sure you're right, but just not sure what that other application could be. That 3rd system is my notebook which I use when I travel all the way out to my living room. ;) In other words, it is setup identical to the two PCs - almost. There are a couple significant differences:

PC 1 has Chrome as a secondary browser.

PC 2 does not have a secondary browser.

Notebook has FF as secondary browser.

PC 1 and 2 use Outlook as email client

Notebook uses Thunderbird.

PCs connect via Ethernet, notebook via 11n.

Other than that, they all have the same programs, security, add-ons, configuration. I suspect FF or TBird, but I don't remember having to download the binaries then, either.

I'll take care of this issue in the next release.
Great! I appreciate the fast response and look forward to testing it out. Will you post a notice here when it is released?

How will you implement this? Will the install routine install the binaries if not there, or prompt the user to go fetch them? Forgive my ignorance - as a hardware technician for secure communications networks for 40+ years, I've made it a career to avoid anything that even sounds like code work! But I still want to know what my hardware is up to and that it remains secure. ;)

@Raa - As for being trusting, when it comes to the Internet, never! Even if all looks legit and you know the source, you can trust, but verify first! That's how I found this thread! Someone mentioned Speckie. I had never heard of it, so I went searching for information and reviews before giving it a try. But reviews, even user reviews, are non-existent and that alone is reason to give pause! It cannot be found in any of the common download sites. I found the Speckie website but you have to admit, it is pretty sparse of information. But it does say, "Speckie is absolutely free" - also much appreciated.

But then I see here where,

Instruction to get a free license:

Go to the sign up page here [versoworks.com]

Select the membership type Speckie (Personal License) ($7.95)

Don't select a payment option (you will not be charged)

Enter a valid email address, you'll need it to be able to log in and download the software

Enter a user name and password

Enter the coupon code 1909B933E6

You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to confirm the account, once confirmed, login to your Versoworks member page and download the software.

Coupon is valid for the first 200 people.

If you have any queries please ask me, I'm the man behind Versoworks

Can I assume Maurizio = Mauro? And this suggests that Speckie is not really, or will not be free.

@Bill_Bright, I'll see if I can update the installer today and I'll post here when its done. The installer will simply download the runtimes and install them for you if it detects they're not installed.

I understand your scepticism when it comes to trusting software because I share it with you. If you look at my profile here on neowin you'll see I've been a member since September 2004, so I'm not a fly-by-nighter. My website, Versoworks.com has an ABN listed at the bottom of it. That's an Australian Business Number, put that into the ASIC website and you'll find it's a registered company here in Australia since 2004. Lastly, you'll notice when you run the Speckie installer that Windows Vista and 7 tell you it's made by a verified publisher, Versoworks Pty Ltd. That means I've signed the installer with a certificate which required me to prove my identity and validate the ownership/existence of my company. All in all, I've tried to be as upfront about who I am and what I do, it's up to you to make an informed decision after that as to whether you trust my work or not.

Up until the the start of this year, all my software was payware. Ahoihoi and Speckie weren't free, but I changed that in January when I moved to an advertising model with Google ads on the website. I thought it would be worth a shot seeing I wasn't getting rich off of this and I still like to tinker with code.

I understand your scepticism when it comes to trusting software because I share it with you. If you look at my profile here on neowin you'll see I've been a member since September 2004, so I'm not a fly-by-nighter. My website, Versoworks.com has an ABN listed at the bottom of it. That's an Australian Business Number, put that into the ASIC website and you'll find it's a registered company here in Australia since 2004. Lastly, you'll notice when you run the Speckie installer that Windows Vista and 7 tell you it's made by a verified publisher, Versoworks Pty Ltd. That means I've signed the installer with a certificate which required me to prove my identity and validate the ownership/existence of my company. All in all, I've tried to be as upfront about who I am and what I do, it's up to you to make an informed decision after that as to whether you trust my work or not.
Please understand, I am not questioning you. But until I found this thread, I could find no information about Speckie and I wanted to learn more about it. I stayed and posted here because (1) though not active here, I have been a member for awhile too, and know the site better than my post count might suggest, and (2), it was immediately apparent this thread and you were the definitive source, and (3) Speckie looked worth pursuing and nothing that happened, or was said has changed that. Nor am I a fly-by-nighter either as the link in my sig reveals. In fact, my "job" involves spending 4 - 5 hours in forums just like this every day helping folks with computer problems. And IMO, part of presenting a professional technical response is proper spelling - I feel it gives credence to the advice we give, hopefully giving the OP confidence to step through some tricky procedure. So while I like IE7Pro, it has several nice features besides an able spell checker, it is not without problems. If there is a better checker, I will switch in a heartbeat, and not hesitate to recommend it to others.
I thought it would be worth a shot seeing I wasn't getting rich off of this and I still like to tinker with code.
I think that is the fate of many good coders - it is hard to charge when there are free alternatives. But if free and good, more folks will give it a try, and they in turn will tell their friends. Plus, they will be more willing to try other products. I note Piriform, the makers of CCleaner. If CCleaner were not free and good, no one would be willing to give Recuva, Defraggler or Speccy a try.

Will there be a US dictionary? I was about to really be skeptical when I saw your "scepticism" - with a "c". I used to live in the UK, but still thought it was spelled with a "k", as in skepticism the world over - until I looked it up. It seems "The Queen's English" uses a "c". Blimey. ;)

Hmmmm, seem to have a problem. A coiuple of them.

First, perhaps just me, but when I see the download page and see 64-bit version, I think, "I'm using 64-bit Windows, that's what I want". But for many, that would be a mistake because even in 64-bit Windows 7, 32-bit IE is the default. So, as happened to me, speckie installed in 64-bit IE but all my programs and shortcuts call up 32-bit. You might want to be more descriptive. But also, I think your All-in-one installer should be the one you push first, and put the individual installers in smaller font, off to the side. And your AIO installer should install, or better yet, prompt to install in 32, 64, or both.

The 64-bit version is working perfectly. But now I am in 32-bit IE on the same machine and it sees Hmmmm and coiuple and tags them (and speckie and AIO) with the red squiggly underlines, but right-clicking shows no menu options and no dictionary words. :( Will play around a bit and see what happens.

Edit add: I just realized 64-bit IE cannot bet set as the default. So it seems more imperative descriptions be more clear. And sadly, I have uninstalled and reinstalled and 32-bit does not work properly.

Nice idea but doesn't work. Win7 Ultimate 64 SP1 IE9 RC Zoom 125%. It immediately crashes IE64. Sometimes it works in IE32 but is very erratic in where you have to click. You have to click the word before the one you want to check or the space between words or even on another line. Or it may be impossible.

Problem signature:

Problem Event Name: APPCRASH

Application Name: iexplore.exe

Application Version: 9.0.8080.16413

Application Timestamp: 4d4ce896

Fault Module Name: MSVCR90.dll

Fault Module Version: 9.0.30729.4940

Fault Module Timestamp: 4ca2e32e

Exception Code: c0000005

Exception Offset: 000000000001e2e0

OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1

Locale ID: 1033

Additional Information 1: 7271

Additional Information 2: 727146b2694cd46d3eaa0ef572ad8d1e

Additional Information 3: e249

Additional Information 4: e24939842395535c8beb4d3dec5a94d8

Edit: Tried it on another PC with same OS but no SP1. IE64 still immediately crashes. But I discovered the other problem is do to zoom being at 125%. Works at 100%

Hmmmm, seem to have a problem. A coiuple of them.

First, perhaps just me, but when I see the download page and see 64-bit version, I think, "I'm using 64-bit Windows, that's what I want". But for many, that would be a mistake because even in 64-bit Windows 7, 32-bit IE is the default. So, as happened to me, speckie installed in 64-bit IE but all my programs and shortcuts call up 32-bit. You might want to be more descriptive. But also, I think your All-in-one installer should be the one you push first, and put the individual installers in smaller font, off to the side. And your AIO installer should install, or better yet, prompt to install in 32, 64, or both.

The 64-bit version is working perfectly. But now I am in 32-bit IE on the same machine and it sees Hmmmm and coiuple and tags them (and speckie and AIO) with the red squiggly underlines, but right-clicking shows no menu options and no dictionary words. :( Will play around a bit and see what happens.

Edit add: I just realized 64-bit IE cannot bet set as the default. So it seems more imperative descriptions be more clear. And sadly, I have uninstalled and reinstalled and 32-bit does not work properly.

THE AIO installer will install both 32 and 64 bit versions on 64 bit Windows.

Nice idea but doesn't work. Win7 Ultimate 64 SP1 IE9 RC Zoom 125%. It immediately crashes IE64. Sometimes it works in IE32 but is very erratic in where you have to click. You have to click the word before the one you want to check or the space between words or even on another line. Or it may be impossible.

Problem signature:

Problem Event Name: APPCRASH

Application Name: iexplore.exe

Application Version: 9.0.8080.16413

Application Timestamp: 4d4ce896

Fault Module Name: MSVCR90.dll

Fault Module Version: 9.0.30729.4940

Fault Module Timestamp: 4ca2e32e

Exception Code: c0000005

Exception Offset: 000000000001e2e0

OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1

Locale ID: 1033

Additional Information 1: 7271

Additional Information 2: 727146b2694cd46d3eaa0ef572ad8d1e

Additional Information 3: e249

Additional Information 4: e24939842395535c8beb4d3dec5a94d8

Edit: Tried it on another PC with same OS but no SP1. IE64 still immediately crashes. But I discovered the other problem is do to zoom being at 125%. Works at 100%

Ahh, thank you for this info, I haven't tested it with the zoom. I'll look in to this ASAP.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!