• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2011


Definitive Best Antivirus 2011  

724 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice? (see Continued, below)

    • Agnitum AV/Outpost
    • Alwil Avast!
    • Arcabit ArcaVir
      0
    • AVG
    • Avira Antivir
    • Beijing Rising AV/Internet Security/PC Doctor
      0
    • Bullguard AV/Internet Security
      0
    • CheckPoint ZoneAlarm/AV/Internet Securit
      0
    • ClamWin
    • Computer Associates
    • Comodo AV/Internet Security
    • Dr. Web (Dialogue Science) AV
      0
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Online Armour
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security
    • F-Secure
    • Frisk F-PROT
      0
    • G Data AV/Interet Security
    • Hauri ViRobot
      0
    • Kaspersky AV/Internet Security
    • ** Not on this list, see below **
  2. 2. Your choice? (continued)

    • McAfee
    • Microsoft Forefront/Security Essentials
    • MWTI eScan
    • Norman AV/Security Suite
    • Panda AV/Internet Security
    • Softwin BitDefender
    • Sophos
    • SUPERAntiSpyware
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
    • Trend Micro
    • VirusBlokAda VBA32
    • Lavasoft Ad-Aware
    • Other (please specify)
    • ** Not on this list, see above **


Question

[NB: Quick edit to fix typo in title as pointed out by the eagle-eyed SuperKid! AG]

Hello,

I have not seen a replacement for the Definitive Best Antivirus 2010 message thread, so thought I would create one.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/966402-definitive-best-antivirus-2011/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I used to swear by Avast. It was amazing and saved me many times. Infact, the only thing that sucked is that it had a terrible media player like interface. That was back in version 4. I upgraded to 5 and loved the new look, but the early versions were causing computers to freeze. I got rid of it and have been using MSE ever since. I'm very happy with MSE, but I'm thinking of switching back to Avast for the simple fact that Microsoft STILL haven't fixed that annoying bug where icons of programs load very slowly within Windows Explorer. Will this bug ever get fixed? If it does, then I'll probably use MSE again. Fix it, Microsoft!!

  • 0

I used to swear by Avast. It was amazing and saved me many times. Infact, the only thing that sucked is that it had a terrible media player like interface. That was back in version 4. I upgraded to 5 and loved the new look, but the early versions were causing computers to freeze. I got rid of it and have been using MSE ever since. I'm very happy with MSE, but I'm thinking of switching back to Avast for the simple fact that Microsoft STILL haven't fixed that annoying bug where icons of programs load very slowly within Windows Explorer. Will this bug ever get fixed? If it does, then I'll probably use MSE again. Fix it, Microsoft!!

It's not a bug. It happens because MSE is scanning those files. The icons are embedded in the EXE, so Explorer has to read the EXE file to extract the icon, which causes MSE to scan the file. So in order to "fix this bug", they would have to make the antivirus faster than it already is.

  • 0

This is just my opinion of course, but there's no best AV out there. It all depends on the type of user. Not only what they use their PC for, but also how they are able to handle all the messages an AV might produce. In layman's terms: it's a personal thing. Every package has its pros or cons. Like mancode20 described, some AV will clog down your explorer as they'll scan every single .exe file every time you reboot your PC. Others don't, they only scan your .exe files if there's been a change in the file itself. Why scan something twice? Others come with a great firewall, while other packages come with a hard to understand / difficult to set up firewall. The latter could be great for someone who wants control, but I know a lot of people who just 'want it to work'. Again, it's personal.

For me, I'm running Norton 360 5.0 at the moment. Got it cheap through work. In all fairness, if my license expires I'd probably go back to MSE. I like them both.

  • 0

Avast 6.

I use to use NOD32. Then a few months ago I bought Norton Internet Security 2011. I liked it alot except the fact it seemed like it was just sucking up memory. I kept getting errors about the OS running out of memory. I got it alot with CounterStrike: Source and also got it once when running FF, explorer and trying to open up Word 2010. Day of Defeat: Source would just crash when I tried to run it. None of the problems I listed would happen if I disabled it. I didn't like the idea of having to disable my AV just to use some of the things on my computer so I dumped it. Installed Avast 6 and couldn't be happier. Even got it on my laptop too.

  • 0

These type of threads always end up in silly arguments .... there is no BEST anything, only what works for you!

They are absolutely stupid polls and a waste of bandwidth. The OP should be made to install the antivirus that wins his or hers ridicules poll.

  • 0

Hello,

Well, there are numerous polls on similar topics (best backup, etc.) and this particular one, with over 100 replies, does seems to be popular. So, I'm afraid we'll just have to agree to disagree on (1) this poll being stupid; (2) this poll being ridiculous; and (3) my installing the 'winning' product.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky (OP for this message thread)

They are absolutely stupid polls and a waste of bandwidth. The OP should be made to install the antivirus that wins his or hers ridicules poll.

  • 0

Hello,

Fixed! Thank you very much for catching that.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

I use security essentials from Microsoft still :D

Also anyone notice the title of this thread says Antvirus not Antivirus?

Hello,

That is probably going to be difficult for most people to benchmark, given the availability of those systems, plus whatever legacy or proprietary applications they might be running which could affect the antivirus program's performance. My suggest would be to obtain trial versions of each program to do some testing, and see which one works best in your environment.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Between NOD32, Vipre and Symantec Endpoint Protection, which one is the least taxing on resources? We're running decade old XP machines at work. Dell Optiplexes, 256~512MB RAM, PIII CPUS :(

  • 0

I dont think there is a super definitive best antivirus. it depends on the person, taste, if you want to pay money, if you find it cracked somewhere...

i have used, norton, eset nod32, also MSE, ALyac (even its korean only) and some others... but i decided to keep Comodo Internet Security, its free and there isn't like real needed features from the paid version to the free version. they are even giving a paid verion 1 years trial. but i dont need it much, since its most for people who are with wireless and if your comp gets a virus they say they pay for it...

But i like it, it has sandbox, which i like using for anything that isnt a real file i trust, i check in virustotal and even it says its not a virus i like using sandbox. it has a nice firewall and i love to play with it, specially if im with jetcast or something i like seeing whensomeone connets, i like how i can termine connection whenever i want. and maybe their antivirus cant be really called the best. but its free, and you dont need antivirus when you can run files sanboxed and dont get infected. i hate Norton after i installed a MMORPG update and it kept deleting the file because it was new... so i hated sonar. and comodo has something like that BUT at least it doesn't delete you can choose whatever you want to do, of course some people dont like questions... and sometimes it can ask too much. BUT when you have your programs trusted it almost dont ask, only the firewall asks.

so for a free internet security i think its good.

  • 0

I have used Microsoft Security Essentials for years, and I still install it on all PCs I fix as I believe it's probably the best Free AV out there, in my personal desktop however I have recently started using Norton Internet Security 2011 because I get it for free from Comcast, I didn't any use Norton products for years due to my horrible experiences with them in the past, however I must say that I'm impressed at how light in resources and feature complete this newest interaction of the product is, I might give the new Avast free a try though.

  • 0

Now I'm using McAfee because it was already installed in my Dell laptop with a 15 months licence but, when this licence expire I'll install Avira Antivir free edition. I have used Antivir for 3 years and it was great because i didn't get viruses.

McAfee is good, but i think it's quite expensive. I've also tryed Microsoft Security Essentials one year ago but i didn't like it a lot, because it was a bit slow... but now I've seen it's one of the most used antivirus in the US and maybe I'll try it when my McAfee licence expires.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!