• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2011


Definitive Best Antivirus 2011  

724 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice? (see Continued, below)

    • Agnitum AV/Outpost
    • Alwil Avast!
    • Arcabit ArcaVir
      0
    • AVG
    • Avira Antivir
    • Beijing Rising AV/Internet Security/PC Doctor
      0
    • Bullguard AV/Internet Security
      0
    • CheckPoint ZoneAlarm/AV/Internet Securit
      0
    • ClamWin
    • Computer Associates
    • Comodo AV/Internet Security
    • Dr. Web (Dialogue Science) AV
      0
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Online Armour
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security
    • F-Secure
    • Frisk F-PROT
      0
    • G Data AV/Interet Security
    • Hauri ViRobot
      0
    • Kaspersky AV/Internet Security
    • ** Not on this list, see below **
  2. 2. Your choice? (continued)

    • McAfee
    • Microsoft Forefront/Security Essentials
    • MWTI eScan
    • Norman AV/Security Suite
    • Panda AV/Internet Security
    • Softwin BitDefender
    • Sophos
    • SUPERAntiSpyware
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
    • Trend Micro
    • VirusBlokAda VBA32
    • Lavasoft Ad-Aware
    • Other (please specify)
    • ** Not on this list, see above **


Question

[NB: Quick edit to fix typo in title as pointed out by the eagle-eyed SuperKid! AG]

Hello,

I have not seen a replacement for the Definitive Best Antivirus 2010 message thread, so thought I would create one.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/966402-definitive-best-antivirus-2011/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hello,

Not sure if this has been posted (did a thread search)...However I 'was' utilizing MS Security Essentials 2.0.657.0-Malware ver: 3.0.8107.0 (which was according to Microsoft Upgrade) the latest version...Has been having a challenge with getting 'Scheduled Scan' to run....Believe me thoroughy reviewed the MS Security Essential Forums (tons of the same issues)...

Have sent a support ticket to the proper channels, then found a 'thread on'......dated July 8th... 'Had been running 2.0....but was notified by colleagues that there was a new 2.1 version'...Why was I not notified by software....bla. bla...

So I went to the official download site, and low-behold now have:

MS Security Essentials: 2.1.116.0

Anti-Malware version: 3.0.8402

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/protect/forum/protect_start/version-upgrade-notification/4d8b05ee-89c4-40c7-92f6-4f7d4ebf5a31

  • 0

Hello,

I think a lot of people will choose and recommend a free solution over a paid one. I think maybe for next year we might try separate free and paid AV solution threads to help winnow out the requests for people who have a preferences for both.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Doesn't MSE tend to score relatively badly on detection tests though? Like here for example - http://www.virusbtn....r-Oct11-850.jpg (the ones towards the top-right did best)

  • 0

Hello,

I think a lot of people will choose and recommend a free solution over a paid one. I think maybe for next year we might try separate free and paid AV solution threads to help winnow out the requests for people who have a preferences for both.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Looking at that link though, I can see several free products that scored a lot better than MSE in terms of detection rates - Avira, AVG and Avast for example. Just curious why most people have rated MSE above these...

  • 0

Hello,

I think Microsoft is more well-known. Perhaps it is considered a more trustworthy? Or maybe it is the lack of advertisements that other free-for-personal use antivirus programs have.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Looking at that link though, I can see several free products that scored a lot better than MSE in terms of detection rates - Avira, AVG and Avast for example. Just curious why most people have rated MSE above these...

  • 0

@goretsky...it's both what's known, and what works for people...I've installed MSSE on several pc's, and NONE have come back with a problem....it's when they try to purchase a full blown suite that starts the problem for them. It does do a pretty good job, though, on an average joe's PC....and they do (home users/average joe's) make up a pretty good majority of the PC population...but in the end, I know, from personal experience, if you pretty much, as was described above, "set it and forget it", it actually works quite well out of the box....for noobs or for experienced users as well. I'm no fanboy or anything, I just believe if it works for you, then by all means, go for it....but at least educate people in the freeware world as well, as there's always something like clamwin or something....it's not a personal attack in any way/shape/form, but I'm glad we can all find what works best for us, as a global community. ;) It's nice to have other options/opinions....at least I think. (especially since there's different platforms)

  • 0

Hello,

Happy 2012 New Year, Neowin!

Per request, separate message threads have been created for free and commercial antivirus programs for 2012:

Please continue to discussions there. Thank you.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do; get an innate understanding of the night sky or a "quicker" path to astrophotography end results. I put "quicker" in quotes because with my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions, half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, spending a few hours shooting, merging photo sessions, etc. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!