• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011


Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011  

335 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      36
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      0
    • Diskeeper
      21
    • JKDefrag
      11
    • Norton Speed Disk
      2
    • O&O Defrag
      26
    • PageDefrag
      0
    • Vopt
      1
    • Windows Defrag
      63
    • PerfectDisk
      74
    • Defraggler
      67
    • Smart Defrag
      9
    • Paragon Total Defrag
      1
    • Other (please specify)
      24


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I tried Auslogics and IObits Smartdefrag 2. Auslogics seemed to do a great job, was fast and low on resources. Smart Defrag was about the same but Smart defrag has a boot time defragger to defrag the MFT, Boot and Pagefile. Also Smartdefrag did the drive in 2 sections, first it defragged then it consolidated and put, what the doc I could find says, files that have been used in the last 30 days in front of all the others on the drive. PerfectDisk does this too but fails to do it and defrag properly every time. I read Puran does all the above too but faster and less resources and it adds a context menu to defrag from the drive icon. I will try this one next.

And yes, I have used Windows Defrag and it is quite good. Maybe in the long run I will end up with that. I just wish it had some kind of graphical view of the drive as it worked.

  • 0

Hi,

Hy wife recently did her free upgrade to Windows 7 and is in love with it. She hates the built in defragger though and bought, against my better judgement, Raxco's PerfectDisk 12. She says she is used to it since she used to use 11, never had a problem with it, it does not seem to impact her performance and keeps her hard drive in good shape., well whatever works for you I say.

She is a little confused about some setting though and she was going to email Raxco support but I think once you read the question we all know what they would say. Even though I used to use version 11 I never played with the defaults. In the default settings under "Boot files and Windows Prefetch Optimization" it gives you 4 choices:

1) PerfectDIsk manages boot files (recommended)

2) PerfectDisk manages boot and prefetch files

3) Windows manages boot and prefetch files

4) Disable

I suggested to let Windows deal with the boot and prefetch files but she wanted me to post here and get the opinions of others who use PerfectDisk, or those more familiar with how Windows handles boot and prefetch files.

What's the best way to go?

  • 0

Hi,

Hy wife recently did her free upgrade to Windows 7 and is in love with it. She hates the built in defragger though and bought, against my better judgement, Raxco's PerfectDisk 12. She says she is used to it since she used to use 11, never had a problem with it, it does not seem to impact her performance and keeps her hard drive in good shape., well whatever works for you I say.

She is a little confused about some setting though and she was going to email Raxco support but I think once you read the question we all know what they would say. Even though I used to use version 11 I never played with the defaults. In the default settings under "Boot files and Windows Prefetch Optimization" it gives you 4 choices:

1) PerfectDIsk manages boot files (recommended)

2) PerfectDisk manages boot and prefetch files

3) Windows manages boot and prefetch files

4) Disable

I suggested to let Windows deal with the boot and prefetch files but she wanted me to post here and get the opinions of others who use PerfectDisk, or those more familiar with how Windows handles boot and prefetch files.

What's the best way to go?

NM she's just going to go with all the defaults.

Thanks,

  • 0

I use MyDefrag (Win XP). It's fast and has a variety of scripts (I usually use Consolidate Free Space). It's easy to use and shows plenty of detail. It shows unmovable blocks, Reserved space and MFT. It works fine with external USB hard drives and memory sticks. And it's free.

UltraDefrag is not bad either.

http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/

I used to use DefragNT (doesn't appear to have updated since 2004):

http://andreigaceff.tripod.com/DefragNT.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!