• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011


Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011  

335 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      36
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      0
    • Diskeeper
      21
    • JKDefrag
      11
    • Norton Speed Disk
      2
    • O&O Defrag
      26
    • PageDefrag
      0
    • Vopt
      1
    • Windows Defrag
      63
    • PerfectDisk
      74
    • Defraggler
      67
    • Smart Defrag
      9
    • Paragon Total Defrag
      1
    • Other (please specify)
      24


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I tried Auslogics and IObits Smartdefrag 2. Auslogics seemed to do a great job, was fast and low on resources. Smart Defrag was about the same but Smart defrag has a boot time defragger to defrag the MFT, Boot and Pagefile. Also Smartdefrag did the drive in 2 sections, first it defragged then it consolidated and put, what the doc I could find says, files that have been used in the last 30 days in front of all the others on the drive. PerfectDisk does this too but fails to do it and defrag properly every time. I read Puran does all the above too but faster and less resources and it adds a context menu to defrag from the drive icon. I will try this one next.

And yes, I have used Windows Defrag and it is quite good. Maybe in the long run I will end up with that. I just wish it had some kind of graphical view of the drive as it worked.

  • 0

Hi,

Hy wife recently did her free upgrade to Windows 7 and is in love with it. She hates the built in defragger though and bought, against my better judgement, Raxco's PerfectDisk 12. She says she is used to it since she used to use 11, never had a problem with it, it does not seem to impact her performance and keeps her hard drive in good shape., well whatever works for you I say.

She is a little confused about some setting though and she was going to email Raxco support but I think once you read the question we all know what they would say. Even though I used to use version 11 I never played with the defaults. In the default settings under "Boot files and Windows Prefetch Optimization" it gives you 4 choices:

1) PerfectDIsk manages boot files (recommended)

2) PerfectDisk manages boot and prefetch files

3) Windows manages boot and prefetch files

4) Disable

I suggested to let Windows deal with the boot and prefetch files but she wanted me to post here and get the opinions of others who use PerfectDisk, or those more familiar with how Windows handles boot and prefetch files.

What's the best way to go?

  • 0

Hi,

Hy wife recently did her free upgrade to Windows 7 and is in love with it. She hates the built in defragger though and bought, against my better judgement, Raxco's PerfectDisk 12. She says she is used to it since she used to use 11, never had a problem with it, it does not seem to impact her performance and keeps her hard drive in good shape., well whatever works for you I say.

She is a little confused about some setting though and she was going to email Raxco support but I think once you read the question we all know what they would say. Even though I used to use version 11 I never played with the defaults. In the default settings under "Boot files and Windows Prefetch Optimization" it gives you 4 choices:

1) PerfectDIsk manages boot files (recommended)

2) PerfectDisk manages boot and prefetch files

3) Windows manages boot and prefetch files

4) Disable

I suggested to let Windows deal with the boot and prefetch files but she wanted me to post here and get the opinions of others who use PerfectDisk, or those more familiar with how Windows handles boot and prefetch files.

What's the best way to go?

NM she's just going to go with all the defaults.

Thanks,

  • 0

I use MyDefrag (Win XP). It's fast and has a variety of scripts (I usually use Consolidate Free Space). It's easy to use and shows plenty of detail. It shows unmovable blocks, Reserved space and MFT. It works fine with external USB hard drives and memory sticks. And it's free.

UltraDefrag is not bad either.

http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/

I used to use DefragNT (doesn't appear to have updated since 2004):

http://andreigaceff.tripod.com/DefragNT.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!