• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011


Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011  

335 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      36
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      0
    • Diskeeper
      21
    • JKDefrag
      11
    • Norton Speed Disk
      2
    • O&O Defrag
      26
    • PageDefrag
      0
    • Vopt
      1
    • Windows Defrag
      63
    • PerfectDisk
      74
    • Defraggler
      67
    • Smart Defrag
      9
    • Paragon Total Defrag
      1
    • Other (please specify)
      24


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I tried Auslogics and IObits Smartdefrag 2. Auslogics seemed to do a great job, was fast and low on resources. Smart Defrag was about the same but Smart defrag has a boot time defragger to defrag the MFT, Boot and Pagefile. Also Smartdefrag did the drive in 2 sections, first it defragged then it consolidated and put, what the doc I could find says, files that have been used in the last 30 days in front of all the others on the drive. PerfectDisk does this too but fails to do it and defrag properly every time. I read Puran does all the above too but faster and less resources and it adds a context menu to defrag from the drive icon. I will try this one next.

And yes, I have used Windows Defrag and it is quite good. Maybe in the long run I will end up with that. I just wish it had some kind of graphical view of the drive as it worked.

  • 0

Hi,

Hy wife recently did her free upgrade to Windows 7 and is in love with it. She hates the built in defragger though and bought, against my better judgement, Raxco's PerfectDisk 12. She says she is used to it since she used to use 11, never had a problem with it, it does not seem to impact her performance and keeps her hard drive in good shape., well whatever works for you I say.

She is a little confused about some setting though and she was going to email Raxco support but I think once you read the question we all know what they would say. Even though I used to use version 11 I never played with the defaults. In the default settings under "Boot files and Windows Prefetch Optimization" it gives you 4 choices:

1) PerfectDIsk manages boot files (recommended)

2) PerfectDisk manages boot and prefetch files

3) Windows manages boot and prefetch files

4) Disable

I suggested to let Windows deal with the boot and prefetch files but she wanted me to post here and get the opinions of others who use PerfectDisk, or those more familiar with how Windows handles boot and prefetch files.

What's the best way to go?

  • 0

Hi,

Hy wife recently did her free upgrade to Windows 7 and is in love with it. She hates the built in defragger though and bought, against my better judgement, Raxco's PerfectDisk 12. She says she is used to it since she used to use 11, never had a problem with it, it does not seem to impact her performance and keeps her hard drive in good shape., well whatever works for you I say.

She is a little confused about some setting though and she was going to email Raxco support but I think once you read the question we all know what they would say. Even though I used to use version 11 I never played with the defaults. In the default settings under "Boot files and Windows Prefetch Optimization" it gives you 4 choices:

1) PerfectDIsk manages boot files (recommended)

2) PerfectDisk manages boot and prefetch files

3) Windows manages boot and prefetch files

4) Disable

I suggested to let Windows deal with the boot and prefetch files but she wanted me to post here and get the opinions of others who use PerfectDisk, or those more familiar with how Windows handles boot and prefetch files.

What's the best way to go?

NM she's just going to go with all the defaults.

Thanks,

  • 0

I use MyDefrag (Win XP). It's fast and has a variety of scripts (I usually use Consolidate Free Space). It's easy to use and shows plenty of detail. It shows unmovable blocks, Reserved space and MFT. It works fine with external USB hard drives and memory sticks. And it's free.

UltraDefrag is not bad either.

http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/

I used to use DefragNT (doesn't appear to have updated since 2004):

http://andreigaceff.tripod.com/DefragNT.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      70
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!