Definitive: Which Linux Distro? (2011)


Definitive: Which Linux Distro? (2011)  

348 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Ubuntu (Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, Mythbuntu)
      165
    • Fedora (Fedora: BLAG Linux and GNU) / (Red Hat: CentOS)
      31
    • openSUSE (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop/Server)
      12
    • Debian GNU/Linux (MEPIS Linux, sidux, Damn Small Linux)
      25
    • Mandriva Linux
      2
    • Linux Mint
      52
    • PCLinuxOS
      3
    • Slackware Linux
      4
    • Gentoo Linux
      8
    • CentOS
      5
    • Arch Linux
      37
    • Sabayon Linux
      1
    • Puppy Linux
      2
    • Chakra GNU/Linux
      1


Recommended Posts

Clearly, my knowledge of Linux distributions is lacking. :pinch:

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Kubuntu all the way. It's just Ubuntu with KDE and a different bootscreen, hovever, KDE is VERY user-friendly. Very pleased that Ubuntu has the highest votes. By the way, what is Mythbuntu and Blackbuntu?

Uhh not quite with you here? Ubuntu is Debian based so not really sure what you are trying to say??

Mint is based on Ubuntu which is based on Debian. Mint Debian Edition is based directly on Debian.

Basically doesn't have some of the changes Ubuntu's made. And it's a rolling release.

Arch, definitely. Get exactly the setup you want with minimal fuss. Sort of like Linux-From-Scratch... without the self-induced brain aneurysm. Always up to date, everything is pure vanilla from the source without third party butchery, easy to configure and maintain, and nobody picking what you should be running for you.

I couldn't have put it better myself!

To anyone slightly afraid of installing: Install your video card drivers first, then X (xorg), then gnome (gdm). "pacman -h" should get you on the right track.

It's really simple if you have the correct package names!

I've changed my mind and changed my vote since this first came out. I was all into Mint then. Since then I have reinstalled Ubuntu 10.10. It terms of customization it seems miles ahead of Mint. It also doesn't have annoyances (fortune cookies in terminal and can not upgrade with Synaptic) that really stands out. I might still offer Mint to a newcomer to Linux because of it's ease of use but for me Ubuntu stands out as the best Linux base out there right now.

  • 1 month later...

linux ubuntu is good, but ubuntu ultimate edition has got to be the best of all, alongside with sabayon, if your more familiar with gentoo, i loved ubuntu but ultimate edition is just way more advanced then windows will ever be, but you have to have at least 2 gigs of ram to benefit from its goodies.....

I was reluctant to choose either Fedora and ubuntu just because they left me a little wanting more. And From what i see they are very friendly. i choose puppy for it's portability but i still want to try Mint but i've been having a hard time getting it to boot.

I vote Gentoo. Simply because it's far more updated and bleeding edge then any other distro and it's easier for me as a Qt developer. Which ArchLinux lacks. I can't stand Ubuntu/Debian because they are too outdated when it is released and I honestly don't feel like reinstalling everytime a new version comes out. I know I can stay at the one I'm on but I want bleeding edge which none of the Ubuntu's distros proves for me.

I can't stand Ubuntu/Debian because they are too outdated when it is released and I honestly don't feel like reinstalling everytime a new version comes out.

You don't have to reinstall when a new version of Ubuntu comes out, the Update-Manager will offer you to update to the newest version and if you run it with the -d switch it'll even update to beta releases which should be interesting for someone who wants to be on the edge :p

For me it's a toss up between Ubuntu and Gentoo. Ubuntu is just so easy going it's a real delight to use whether you're a professional programmer or complete beginner. Gentoo can be very hardcore if you do a tool chain compile install, but once you get it up and running, every part of it can be customised to the heart's content, from selecting only the kernel modules your hardware needs, to a highly personal desktop environment or frame buffer terminal interface. It arguably has the best package manager of all distros - portage. But again, it's not for the faint of heart. If you're a programmer though, it's a piece of cake :D

There is nothing really "wrong" with Ubuntu and its derivatives. It has come a long way in recent years and will continue to grow. I was increasingly worried about the new Unity interface (not really worried, but concerned nothing would flow together thoroughly). In the first beta I was very impressed. Already, there were plenty of bugs ironed out. Beta 2 is set to release later today, and I look forward to it. I surely appreciate and respect Canonical as Linux would not be where it is today without them.

With that said, my distribution of choice is Arch Linux. As everyone else has already said, the rolling release model is great. Users from other distributions may say that bleeding edge is not always a good thing, that you are prone to new bugs. Honestly, with Arch, your system is what you make of it. I am a simple guy, I like a standard Openbox WM with a Tint2 panel. The best part of Arch is their documentation. It is the most thorough and well put together Wiki that I have ever seen. What questions cannot be found on there can be asked on the forum. Members there are very generous, as long as you put forth effort and do not ask them to hold your hand.

When it comes to server software, I recommend CentOS. It is a very solid Enterprise Linux Distribution. They go with what works, a very stable and time-proven system.

What do yall think of the openSUSe distro?? I was thinking of using that instead of Ubuntu.

Actually not bad for a complete-out-of-the-box distro. Personally I hate Yast (and RPM's in general) with a passion though, but that's just my opinion. Other than that it felt like a well rounded setup, both their KDE and Gnome flavors. There's a live CD available to get a feel for it, like many other distros. Give it a spin, only thing you got to lose is a spare disc.

If I were to get Arch Linux, which would be my best option? i686 CPU | x86-64 CPU | Dual Architecture

I got an Intel Core i5 M 480 - 4GB ram..

Again, just my opinion. With "only" 4GB, I'd personally go with the 686 build. Less potential issues with some software.

What do yall think of the openSUSe distro?? I was thinking of using that instead of Ubuntu.

It's a bit harder than Ubuntu. Ubuntu will spoil you if you're not careful. Also, openSuse is a bit slower and Yast is just terrible to work with. I don't much care for it myself. It seems more for corporate desktops.

Actually not bad for a complete-out-of-the-box distro. Personally I hate Yast (and RPM's in general) with a passion though, but that's just my opinion. Other than that it felt like a well rounded setup, both their KDE and Gnome flavors. There's a live CD available to get a feel for it, like many other distros. Give it a spin, only thing you got to lose is a spare disc.

Or you can just put it on a usb pen drive using unetbootin's automatic download/install functionality. It's certainly quicker and cheaper than messing around with discs.

Or you can just put it on a usb pen drive using unetbootin's automatic download/install functionality. It's certainly quicker and cheaper than messing around with discs.

You shouldn't use unetbootin nor do you have any need for it when using openSUSE's LiveCDs as they are out of the box hybrid .iso, just use the SUSE Studio Image Writer or simply write the images as they are to a USB stick.

As for those preaching about the "greatness" of Ubuntu, let me ask you this; how many contributions to kernel, applications or Linux in general can you name that came from Canonical? I wish I could name one but I can't.

Arch, definitely. Get exactly the setup you want with minimal fuss. Sort of like Linux-From-Scratch... without the self-induced brain aneurysm. Always up to date, everything is pure vanilla from the source without third party butchery, easy to configure and maintain, and nobody picking what you should be running for you.

Archlinux is the way for me.. using it for about a year now and never looked back.

You shouldn't use unetbootin nor do you have any need for it when using openSUSE's LiveCDs as they are out of the box hybrid .iso, just use the SUSE Studio Image Writer or simply write the images as they are to a USB stick.

Well I only mentioned unetbootin because of its convenience. But of course, if you have a disk image iso/img already, then a dd if=image of=/dev/sdd bs=1M would work fine too.

As for those preaching about the "greatness" of Ubuntu, let me ask you this; how many contributions to kernel, applications or Linux in general can you name that came from Canonical? I wish I could name one but I can't.

Huh? Where did that come from? I was only recommending an alternate installation method, sheesh! As far as the contributions of Canonical are concerned, I can think of quite a few. But I'm not here to defend specific companies. As long as we, as users, benefit from the user friendliness of Ubuntu, what's the problem?

As far as the contributions of Canonical are concerned, I can think of quite a few. But I'm not here to defend specific companies. As long as we, as users, benefit from the user friendliness of Ubuntu, what's the problem?

Not a big fan of Ubuntu myself, but I'd have to agree with that, they did come up with a few interesting bits of their own that go beyond a theme and font. Unity (love it or hate it), NotifyOSD is actually rather nice, etc etc, plus don't forget the on-line services they offer as well.

As long as we, as users, benefit from the user friendliness of Ubuntu, what's the problem?

Perhaps because when you look at the whole, they contribute absolutely nothing other than hype. I have more components contributed by Apple on my Linux system than from Canonical - I'd say that speaks volumes.

And if you're wondering why it bothers me - it bothers me because overhyping Canonical and Ubuntu leaves out the real contributors, the people who actually do something other than just package things. Ubuntu this, Ubuntu that and then when you look at the actual sources you find Redhat, Novell, IBM and various other contributors but practically never anything Canonical.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!