Definitive: Which Linux Distro? (2011)


Definitive: Which Linux Distro? (2011)  

348 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Ubuntu (Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, Mythbuntu)
      165
    • Fedora (Fedora: BLAG Linux and GNU) / (Red Hat: CentOS)
      31
    • openSUSE (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop/Server)
      12
    • Debian GNU/Linux (MEPIS Linux, sidux, Damn Small Linux)
      25
    • Mandriva Linux
      2
    • Linux Mint
      52
    • PCLinuxOS
      3
    • Slackware Linux
      4
    • Gentoo Linux
      8
    • CentOS
      5
    • Arch Linux
      37
    • Sabayon Linux
      1
    • Puppy Linux
      2
    • Chakra GNU/Linux
      1


Recommended Posts

Clearly, my knowledge of Linux distributions is lacking. :pinch:

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Kubuntu all the way. It's just Ubuntu with KDE and a different bootscreen, hovever, KDE is VERY user-friendly. Very pleased that Ubuntu has the highest votes. By the way, what is Mythbuntu and Blackbuntu?

Uhh not quite with you here? Ubuntu is Debian based so not really sure what you are trying to say??

Mint is based on Ubuntu which is based on Debian. Mint Debian Edition is based directly on Debian.

Basically doesn't have some of the changes Ubuntu's made. And it's a rolling release.

Arch, definitely. Get exactly the setup you want with minimal fuss. Sort of like Linux-From-Scratch... without the self-induced brain aneurysm. Always up to date, everything is pure vanilla from the source without third party butchery, easy to configure and maintain, and nobody picking what you should be running for you.

I couldn't have put it better myself!

To anyone slightly afraid of installing: Install your video card drivers first, then X (xorg), then gnome (gdm). "pacman -h" should get you on the right track.

It's really simple if you have the correct package names!

I've changed my mind and changed my vote since this first came out. I was all into Mint then. Since then I have reinstalled Ubuntu 10.10. It terms of customization it seems miles ahead of Mint. It also doesn't have annoyances (fortune cookies in terminal and can not upgrade with Synaptic) that really stands out. I might still offer Mint to a newcomer to Linux because of it's ease of use but for me Ubuntu stands out as the best Linux base out there right now.

  • 1 month later...

linux ubuntu is good, but ubuntu ultimate edition has got to be the best of all, alongside with sabayon, if your more familiar with gentoo, i loved ubuntu but ultimate edition is just way more advanced then windows will ever be, but you have to have at least 2 gigs of ram to benefit from its goodies.....

I was reluctant to choose either Fedora and ubuntu just because they left me a little wanting more. And From what i see they are very friendly. i choose puppy for it's portability but i still want to try Mint but i've been having a hard time getting it to boot.

I vote Gentoo. Simply because it's far more updated and bleeding edge then any other distro and it's easier for me as a Qt developer. Which ArchLinux lacks. I can't stand Ubuntu/Debian because they are too outdated when it is released and I honestly don't feel like reinstalling everytime a new version comes out. I know I can stay at the one I'm on but I want bleeding edge which none of the Ubuntu's distros proves for me.

I can't stand Ubuntu/Debian because they are too outdated when it is released and I honestly don't feel like reinstalling everytime a new version comes out.

You don't have to reinstall when a new version of Ubuntu comes out, the Update-Manager will offer you to update to the newest version and if you run it with the -d switch it'll even update to beta releases which should be interesting for someone who wants to be on the edge :p

For me it's a toss up between Ubuntu and Gentoo. Ubuntu is just so easy going it's a real delight to use whether you're a professional programmer or complete beginner. Gentoo can be very hardcore if you do a tool chain compile install, but once you get it up and running, every part of it can be customised to the heart's content, from selecting only the kernel modules your hardware needs, to a highly personal desktop environment or frame buffer terminal interface. It arguably has the best package manager of all distros - portage. But again, it's not for the faint of heart. If you're a programmer though, it's a piece of cake :D

There is nothing really "wrong" with Ubuntu and its derivatives. It has come a long way in recent years and will continue to grow. I was increasingly worried about the new Unity interface (not really worried, but concerned nothing would flow together thoroughly). In the first beta I was very impressed. Already, there were plenty of bugs ironed out. Beta 2 is set to release later today, and I look forward to it. I surely appreciate and respect Canonical as Linux would not be where it is today without them.

With that said, my distribution of choice is Arch Linux. As everyone else has already said, the rolling release model is great. Users from other distributions may say that bleeding edge is not always a good thing, that you are prone to new bugs. Honestly, with Arch, your system is what you make of it. I am a simple guy, I like a standard Openbox WM with a Tint2 panel. The best part of Arch is their documentation. It is the most thorough and well put together Wiki that I have ever seen. What questions cannot be found on there can be asked on the forum. Members there are very generous, as long as you put forth effort and do not ask them to hold your hand.

When it comes to server software, I recommend CentOS. It is a very solid Enterprise Linux Distribution. They go with what works, a very stable and time-proven system.

What do yall think of the openSUSe distro?? I was thinking of using that instead of Ubuntu.

Actually not bad for a complete-out-of-the-box distro. Personally I hate Yast (and RPM's in general) with a passion though, but that's just my opinion. Other than that it felt like a well rounded setup, both their KDE and Gnome flavors. There's a live CD available to get a feel for it, like many other distros. Give it a spin, only thing you got to lose is a spare disc.

If I were to get Arch Linux, which would be my best option? i686 CPU | x86-64 CPU | Dual Architecture

I got an Intel Core i5 M 480 - 4GB ram..

Again, just my opinion. With "only" 4GB, I'd personally go with the 686 build. Less potential issues with some software.

What do yall think of the openSUSe distro?? I was thinking of using that instead of Ubuntu.

It's a bit harder than Ubuntu. Ubuntu will spoil you if you're not careful. Also, openSuse is a bit slower and Yast is just terrible to work with. I don't much care for it myself. It seems more for corporate desktops.

Actually not bad for a complete-out-of-the-box distro. Personally I hate Yast (and RPM's in general) with a passion though, but that's just my opinion. Other than that it felt like a well rounded setup, both their KDE and Gnome flavors. There's a live CD available to get a feel for it, like many other distros. Give it a spin, only thing you got to lose is a spare disc.

Or you can just put it on a usb pen drive using unetbootin's automatic download/install functionality. It's certainly quicker and cheaper than messing around with discs.

Or you can just put it on a usb pen drive using unetbootin's automatic download/install functionality. It's certainly quicker and cheaper than messing around with discs.

You shouldn't use unetbootin nor do you have any need for it when using openSUSE's LiveCDs as they are out of the box hybrid .iso, just use the SUSE Studio Image Writer or simply write the images as they are to a USB stick.

As for those preaching about the "greatness" of Ubuntu, let me ask you this; how many contributions to kernel, applications or Linux in general can you name that came from Canonical? I wish I could name one but I can't.

Arch, definitely. Get exactly the setup you want with minimal fuss. Sort of like Linux-From-Scratch... without the self-induced brain aneurysm. Always up to date, everything is pure vanilla from the source without third party butchery, easy to configure and maintain, and nobody picking what you should be running for you.

Archlinux is the way for me.. using it for about a year now and never looked back.

You shouldn't use unetbootin nor do you have any need for it when using openSUSE's LiveCDs as they are out of the box hybrid .iso, just use the SUSE Studio Image Writer or simply write the images as they are to a USB stick.

Well I only mentioned unetbootin because of its convenience. But of course, if you have a disk image iso/img already, then a dd if=image of=/dev/sdd bs=1M would work fine too.

As for those preaching about the "greatness" of Ubuntu, let me ask you this; how many contributions to kernel, applications or Linux in general can you name that came from Canonical? I wish I could name one but I can't.

Huh? Where did that come from? I was only recommending an alternate installation method, sheesh! As far as the contributions of Canonical are concerned, I can think of quite a few. But I'm not here to defend specific companies. As long as we, as users, benefit from the user friendliness of Ubuntu, what's the problem?

As far as the contributions of Canonical are concerned, I can think of quite a few. But I'm not here to defend specific companies. As long as we, as users, benefit from the user friendliness of Ubuntu, what's the problem?

Not a big fan of Ubuntu myself, but I'd have to agree with that, they did come up with a few interesting bits of their own that go beyond a theme and font. Unity (love it or hate it), NotifyOSD is actually rather nice, etc etc, plus don't forget the on-line services they offer as well.

As long as we, as users, benefit from the user friendliness of Ubuntu, what's the problem?

Perhaps because when you look at the whole, they contribute absolutely nothing other than hype. I have more components contributed by Apple on my Linux system than from Canonical - I'd say that speaks volumes.

And if you're wondering why it bothers me - it bothers me because overhyping Canonical and Ubuntu leaves out the real contributors, the people who actually do something other than just package things. Ubuntu this, Ubuntu that and then when you look at the actual sources you find Redhat, Novell, IBM and various other contributors but practically never anything Canonical.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • State of Decay 2, Blasphemous 2, and more join Xbox Free Play Days by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The latest Free Play Days offer has just kicked off, giving Xbox players the chance to try out a new selection of games over the weekend. The offerings this time aren't as massive as last weekend, but there are still major releases for Xbox players to jump into. This includes Undead Labs' post-apocalyptic title State of Decay 2, as well as two Team17-published titles. Two of the games being offered this time are available to all Xbox players without needing any kind of Game Pass subscription. In the fully free-to-play section, you can jump into State of Decay 2. The title is both an action survival title and a community builder, letting players choose a map, set up their base, and try to keep the growing zombie threat at bay. Cooperative play is available too. Don't forget that the studio is preparing a third entry for 2027. Next, Blasphemous 2 drops in for Metroidvania and Soulslike fans, where The Penitent One returns for another adventure. The title has tough combat with multiple weapon options, deadly traps to avoid, and platforming sequences requiring a lot of patience and timing. Keep in mind though that the offer does have a 5-hour time limit attached to it. Lastly, Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, and Essential members can now try out the WWII-set first-person shooter Hell Let Loose. The multiplayer game offers 50 vs 50 combat in massive maps, with infantry, tank, and artillery options available for players. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Hell Let Loose (Xbox Series X|S, PC) State of Decay 2: Juggernaut Edition (Xbox Series X|S, PC) Blasphemous 2 (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, and then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 11, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • Can we not have paperless office, like we was promised in the 80's
    • I actually laughed out loud in real life at the heading on this—whatever Microsoft is drinking, I want some of it.
    • Euro-Office must default to ODF to be considered "genuinely European", LibreOffice argues by David Uzondu Euro-Office is a web-based collaborative office suite that positions itself as a "European sovereign alternative" to American tech companies, backed by a coalition of developers including Nextcloud, IONOS, Abilian, BTactic, OpenProject, and, more recently, Tuta. The project officially went live a couple of days ago, but not before drawing heavy fire from LibreOffice developers, who called the marketing claim that Euro-Office represents the "first open-source office suite developed in Europe" a deceptive historical inaccuracy because projects like OpenOffice and LibreOffice existed decades earlier. Now that the project has launched, LibreOffice is back with another complaint, arguing that Euro-Office cannot consider itself "genuinely European" while it pushes proprietary Microsoft defaults on users. Euro-Office had promised to improve the OpenDocument Format (ODF) back in April, but the current release still plagues users with several technical failures. For instance, the suite lacks an admin setting to enforce ODF, and mobile editors completely block ODF saves, forcing files into Microsoft's OOXML formats. Some configurations force files into read-only mode, while editing frequently corrupts document formatting or erases data. LibreOffice thinks that merely supporting a format as an afterthought does not make you a sovereign alternative, as file formats are the battleground where" digital sovereignty is won or lost." The road to the first stable release of Euro-Office has been quite bumpy due to an aggressive public fallout with OnlyOffice, from which the coalition originally forked the project. OnlyOffice struck back by accusing the coalition of violating copyright terms under its AGPLv3 branding requirements by stripping the original branding anyway and forking the code. Getting Euro-Office up and running is a bit wonky (at least for non-technical users), as there is no direct installer to grab off the web. The easiest way we learnt is by using Docker. First, pull the official Euro-Office image from the GitHub Container Registry: docker pull ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest Then, run the container with active ports and a secure JWT token, enabling the test environment: docker run -i -t -d -p 8080:80 --restart=always -e EXAMPLE_ENABLED=true -e JWT_SECRET=my_secure_jwt_secret ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest And finally, open a web browser and go to the following address: http://localhost:8080 If you are running this on a remote server, replace localhost with your server's IP address. You will see the Euro-Office test page, where you can create new text documents, spreadsheets, or presentations directly in the browser. Image via Euro-Office Nextcloud promises that proper standalone desktop versions and mobile apps will arrive in a future release.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!