Definitive: Which Linux Distro? (2011)


Definitive: Which Linux Distro? (2011)  

348 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Ubuntu (Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, Mythbuntu)
      165
    • Fedora (Fedora: BLAG Linux and GNU) / (Red Hat: CentOS)
      31
    • openSUSE (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop/Server)
      12
    • Debian GNU/Linux (MEPIS Linux, sidux, Damn Small Linux)
      25
    • Mandriva Linux
      2
    • Linux Mint
      52
    • PCLinuxOS
      3
    • Slackware Linux
      4
    • Gentoo Linux
      8
    • CentOS
      5
    • Arch Linux
      37
    • Sabayon Linux
      1
    • Puppy Linux
      2
    • Chakra GNU/Linux
      1


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Perhaps because when you look at the whole, they contribute absolutely nothing other than hype. I have more components contributed by Apple on my Linux system than from Canonical - I'd say that speaks volumes.

And if you're wondering why it bothers me - it bothers me because overhyping Canonical and Ubuntu leaves out the real contributors, the people who actually do something other than just package things. Ubuntu this, Ubuntu that and then when you look at the actual sources you find Redhat, Novell, IBM and various other contributors but practically never anything Canonical.

Contribute nothing! :o

1. Unity

2. Notify OSD

3. As of now canonical developers are working on Wayland

etc etc

Google it!

Arch Linux FTW! :)

  • 3 weeks later...

Arch Linux! I do test out other distributions to see what they currently do. But, the ability to keep up to date with all the packages and ease of use made me stick with Arch Linux for the past 2 years. Before switching to Arch, I was with Ubuntu.

  • 3 weeks later...

Probably will be going to Linux Mint as I'm not too sure I am liking the new Ubuntu Unity UI thingy.

I do have to confess that I haven't gotten as serious with Linux in general as much as I probably should. The only reason I still keep Windows around is for gaming.

  • 2 months later...

I have been an openSUSE fan for years but 11.x seems to be getting worse and worse. Ubuntu's Unity UI is pretty bogged and slow so Im with Fedora 16 at the moment and pretty happy. Will most likely try out opensuse 12.1 when its released but Im not holding my breath its been improved significantly.

Ubuntu = the closest thing to a Standard Linux OS -

I like Linux but it has a major flaw and its keeping it a hobby OS because everyone has there hands in it - not always a good thing

Linux can go to the top look what Mac did with Unix

they just had the largest year for mac desktops ever

Right now I'm back on arch. I jumped ship for a bit and tried the new ubuntu/fedora/suse ect... but I never should have left :) I love pacman and the aur, and even with a full gnome 3 desktop my system is significantly faster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in may areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!