Recommended Posts

Yeah, I focused on that one, too. You know, the one that makes you wrong yet again, as we've been trying to point out to you.

I agreed with the tweet that I provided, not hiding that. That's why I posted it. But then that's why I also provided in my previous post a better encoded source that skipped the YouTube encoding (which deceased the quality of the image a bit), for much better quality for the likes of you and her.

Now prove me wrong in what? That the PS3 demonstrated version is far less detailed than the PC version, or what?

Because I never said the PS3 version is more impressive than the PC's one :blink:

LOL. Didn't know I'd wondered into a flame war. I do think the PS3 will look great but I also don't think that the PC is as powerful as people make out in practical terms. Sure there is a lot more horsepower but there is also several more times overhead than what you get with PS3 or Xbox 360.

I agreed with the tweet that I provided, not hiding that. That's why I posted it. But then that's why I also provided in my previous post a better encoded source that skipped the YouTube encoding (which deceased the quality of the image a bit), for much better quality for the likes of you and her.

Now prove me wrong in what? That the PS3 demonstrated version is far less detailed than the PC version, or what?

Because I never said the PS3 version is more impressive than the PC's one :blink:

No one here is debating with you that the PC version doesn't look better -- you get that, right? We're debating with you that it looks "like DICE didn't even try" with the console versions, and that the videos and screen captures you've been posting are indicative of what we'll see on our home television sets.

Also, your second video still does not take into account that the image has been compressed when it was broadcast, which you don't seem to be comprehending. Yes, the Youtube version was further compressed, but this is yet another recording of a compressed signal. You've seen the comparisons of a Blu-ray and a movie broadcast in HD, correct? You're going to face a similar issue here.

It wasn't filmed off-screen. It was a direct feed, just like the presentation of the tank battle in E3.

If it wasn't, the end result would be a lot of this: http://i.imgur.com/l2EnK.jpg

Do notice there's no camera in front of the screen to capture the so called "off-screen" footage. And if there was a camera behind Jimmy and the guys from DICE capturing the screen showing the game, we would see their backs as they're in front of the screen. So no, def. not an off-screen footage.

You assume they are filming it from the same screen.

It was already stated on the official Battlefield blog that it was filmed off-screen. And it's pretty clear that it was:

Battlefield 3 just made its public console debut! We went to New York to visit Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, where we played Battlefield 3 live on PS3 in front of the audience. Check it out below. Sorry for the ghosting and rasterizations -- this was filmed offscreen.

http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/Default.aspx##

^ :rofl:

No one here is debating with you that the PC version doesn't look better -- you get that, right? We're debating with you that it looks "like DICE didn't even try" with the console versions, and that the videos and screen captures you've been posting are indicative of what we'll see on our home television sets.

Also, your second video still does not take into account that the image has been compressed when it was broadcast, which you don't seem to be comprehending. Yes, the Youtube version was further compressed, but this is yet another recording of a compressed signal. You've seen the comparisons of a Blu-ray and a movie broadcast in HD, correct? You're going to face a similar issue here.

honestly, i would be STOKED if they didn't try on the console versions. now the console players know how it feels to be a PC gamer for the last 5 or so years... being treated as the ****** child of gaming.

No one here is debating with you that the PC version doesn't look better -- you get that, right? We're debating with you that it looks "like DICE didn't even try" with the console versions, and that the videos and screen captures you've been posting are indicative of what we'll see on our home television sets.

Also, your second video still does not take into account that the image has been compressed when it was broadcast, which you don't seem to be comprehending. Yes, the Youtube version was further compressed, but this is yet another recording of a compressed signal. You've seen the comparisons of a Blu-ray and a movie broadcast in HD, correct? You're going to face a similar issue here.

The "didn't even try" referred to major missing details in the game (details on walls, on fences, buildings, people in front of you not to speak a few meters ahead of you (lod in general), lighting, shadows and etc.). Not the image quality and compression of the video itself. You can notice the lack of the details even with heavy compression.

And I know the PS3 is limited in power compared to the PC, but games before BF3 had those details perfected even in earlier builds (Advanced Warfighter 2 on the consoles for example. And that game was released back in 2007). And four months before the release, that can't be a demo of that early of a build, of a complete level that was already shown on different platform month (if not two) ago.

You assume they are filming it from the same screen.

It was already stated on the official Battlefield blog that it was filmed off-screen. And it's pretty clear that it was:

http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/Default.aspx##

That only bring us back to the image quality of the video, and not the details in the game itself.

This is just unacceptable. Look at how horrible the graphics are in real-life!

You should turn on the deinterlace filter in your video player and then try again.

Early speculation is a waste of time.

The game will look great all around. The game will look best on a $2,500 PC, that is the advantage on throwing down g's on a gaming rig. End of story.

Don't like it? Too bad.

Yea but..

Gaming Rig - $2,500

Battlefield 3 PC copy - $60

60 Degree Console FOV - Negative 9,000....

Watch they will manage to screw it up some how.

all that video is doing is showing that a developer is actually taking advantage of the power of a current PCs instead of making a console port. MUCH respect to DICE for that. and that's still a ****ty video to make the comparisons. maybe everything it says is right, but look how muddy the PS3 coverage looks compared to the PC coverage...

I really hope the menu's and what not on PC are optimized for a mouse and keyboard and not a controller though...

I'd rather spend ?150 on a console to be honest..

Agreed. TBH I thought BF3 looked great on PS3 though it is pretty obvious that the PC looks really good if you have the specs for it. I'm more curious to see CoD MW3 vs BF3 comparison imo.

Put it this way, if I could afford it I'd be buying this for PC, along with every other game, because imo PC Gaming is much more enjoyable, in terms of gameplay.. the communities that form.. and the modifications that follow, but I can't so ?150 instead of ?1000 for slightly inferior graphics really doesn't bother me whatsoever.

In no way did I suggest spending money on a new PC just for one game, simply correcting the over exaggeration of the cost for a more than decent PC capable of running it on max. If you have a console and not a good PC for this game, just buy it for consoles. I find it silly anyone would lay down cash to get a brand new computer just for one game unless there's a bigger picture involved besides gaming purposes.

Agreed. TBH I thought BF3 looked great on PS3 though it is pretty obvious that the PC looks really good if you have the specs for it. I'm more curious to see CoD MW3 vs BF3 comparison imo.

Why? Just go look at any other CoD over the past few years and you're looking at it MW3...nothing to compare. BF3 on any platform will destroy CoD visually (fact).

Put it this way, if I could afford it I'd be buying this for PC, along with every other game, because imo PC Gaming is much more enjoyable, in terms of gameplay.. the communities that form.. and the modifications that follow, but I can't so ?150 instead of ?1000 for slightly inferior graphics really doesn't bother me whatsoever.

It won't just be slightly inferior graphics though. It will be inferior gameplay as well. Maps won't be as large and player count will be limited quite drastically too.

It won't just be slightly inferior graphics though. It will be inferior gameplay as well. Maps won't be as large and player count will be limited quite drastically too.

That doesn't bother me, wasn't it the same with BC2? I love that on console so.. don't see how less players can affect gameplay really, just the situations you find yourself in, not the handling.

Like I said, I'd love it on PC, but for the sake of saving ?850 on a console instead of a rig able to play it, then I'm OK.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
    • The first improvement they need to make to audio in W11 is to add an equalizer that actually works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!