Recommended Posts

Dude, that's harsh :(

I'm not all about destruction. But for me, it's does add a whole new angle of gameplay. The ability to create and destroy cover as and when you need it is really handy.

It sounds like destroying cover will still be possible, you just won't be knocking over any skyscrapers. :rofl:

EDIT: Also worth noting that the only source for this is the ign article, no where near official word from ea/dice... the only official word from ea has been "destruction 2.0 is not gone"

people need to stop flipping out at rumors :p. Also note that bf3 is still in an alpha.

I highly doubt bf3 will have less destruction than bc2.

I like collapsible houses in BC2 so I hope they'll make a return in BF3, but with some limitations depending on the map. For example, only allow some buildings to get brought down in Operation Metro so that the face of the map/gameplay isn't completely ruined (non collapsible houses could also work as a decent barrier between out of bounds and gameplay areas).

I like collapsible houses in BC2 so I hope they'll make a return in BF3, but with some limitations depending on the map. For example, only allow some buildings to get brought down in Operation Metro so that the face of the map/gameplay isn't completely ruined (non collapsible houses could also work as a decent barrier between out of bounds and gameplay areas).

Agreed. It'd be silly if you could collapse every structure on a map. By the end of the game, the map would look like a levelled wasteland.

Also...

Battlefield 3 Battlelog revealed

battlelog-620x499.jpg

Large view

After much talk about the new web-based Battlefield 3 service, Battlelog, DICE has finally revealed the first images of the new service, and it looks quite promising. Battlelog resembles a complete social network for Battlefield 3 players, with chat, profiles, news feed, forums etc. So far the service looks to be in alpha, and uses some Bad Company 2 icons and graphics as replacements. Here are a few more images of Battlelog:

Battlelog profile page

battlelog-31-620x358.jpg

Large view

Battlelog chat feature

battlelog-2-611x620.jpg

Large view

Source: BF3Blog (Unofficial)

:woot:

Damn, that Battlelog actually looks really cool. Right now I'm using Statsverse to keep track of everything in BC2, but having something that's integrated into the experience is definitely neat. The social networking stuff sounds interesting as well, and it totally makes sense for a game like this that plays so much better when you're in a squad with competent people.

Though I do see that your kill/death ratio and accuracy are both front and center on the page, which will be embarrassing for me :laugh: . At least score per minute is there as well, so I'll have one half-decent stat on my page.

I like collapsible houses in BC2 so I hope they'll make a return in BF3, but with some limitations depending on the map. For example, only allow some buildings to get brought down in Operation Metro so that the face of the map/gameplay isn't completely ruined (non collapsible houses could also work as a decent barrier between out of bounds and gameplay areas).

Agreed. Smaller structures should be collapsible and larger structures like skyscrapers should have destructible elements (eg walls/windows) but not collapse. Removing destruction completely would be disappointing.

Agreed. Smaller structures should be collapsible and larger structures like skyscrapers should have destructible elements (eg walls/windows) but not collapse. Removing destruction completely would be disappointing.

They are not going to remove destruction, simply SOME buildings won't be completely destructible to maintain a balanced gameplay, they already stated this in a podcast by Don't Revive Me Bro with Daniel Matros (zh1nt0).

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=29372573&postcount=2837

Might not stay up for long. Click click click!

Whoever leaked those forgot to hide their username in one of the screenshots.

It's been awhile since I last logged into the Battlefield veteran site. :(

Also, I got the following message after attempting to log into the BF3 alpha site:

WE'RE SORRY - YOU DON'T MEET THE CRITERIA TO ENTER THIS SITE.

hmm that's a bummer... i'm a veteran etc didn't have newsletter though do now still there's nothing. ahwell.

specs look a bit interesting though...

- OS: Windows 7 or Vista (SP1)

- Installed: Origin

- CPU: Quadcore 2.0 GHz or faster

- RAM: 4 GB or more

- Hard Drive: 7.25 GB of free disk space

- Video: 512 MB or greater DirectX compatible 10 or 11 card with latest drivers (5.11 or later AMD, nVidia 275.33 or later)

- Sound: DirectX compatible 10 or 11 card

- Internet: broadband connection

good thing my upgrade well passes them.

The trees fall down too.... blandly... I hope they have some splintering and break offs to exploded trees.

Indeed, but it's a start. I like it a lot more than being able to toss 10 RPGs at a tree and have it still standing as with current games. All the sound effects are amazing though!

Damn, that footage looks amazing.

And my Veteran status is an 8, and it should be a 9 as for some reason even though I have all of the games down as owned it does not register all 9, abut I also do not get anything but the denial message when I try to enter that site, so not really sure how much Veteran status plays into it all. Oh well. The Alpha footage above looks sweet as all hell though. :yes:

Oh wait, my Veteran status is correct, I never noticed this little disclaimer until just now...

Your veteran rank is always the total number of highlighted BF games that add to your vet rank, minus one.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!