Recommended Posts

Got into Alpha. Not sure if I want to even bother due to Origin. :/

Origin really isn't that bad...

I suppose it could be an unlucky combination of hardware. I just find it incredibly frustrating getting an alpha code to a game I've been dying to play since they announced it only to find out I can't even run it decently.

In my opinion even on high the game looks worse than BC2 maxed out in it's current state. Nothing looks better, aside from a handful of textures here and there (mostly the weapons and characters, some map textures). I still think BC2 is still one of the most polished looking games available at this point in time.

I'm going to assume it'll only getting better from the Beta onward, but I just fail to see the point in releasing something like an alpha when assumingly a more polished Beta is on the way a little over a month from now. This has done nothing but leave a bad taste in my mouth.

IMO the lighting/shadows is all around far better, especially in the subway... The sunrays are really nice too. Another great touch is the suppression effects. Water is a lot nicer too (but its still way to static, like all the other bf games.)

And dude its an alpha. When I think of alpha software, Polished certainly shouldn't come to mind. Play it for what it is.... I think its pretty polished for an alpha, I've played games in much rougher shape (like the natural selection 2 alpha)

Havent touched my PC all summer, check my email today and saw I got an invite Last Night / Early this Morning (2am) and I instantly turned on my PC got on and started the dl.

After about half an hour i started playing, i just stopped after a 2 hour gameplay.

Let me tell you, for an alpha, DICE has truly shown its color. The game feels like BF2 again, made for PC. Im running it @ 1280 x 720 and im getting 60+ FPS on HIGH with my 580 GTX.

I cant wait for the beta / official game. I am loving it a lot so far and I cant even begin to tell how excited I am this game is now a reality in my fingertips.

Now back to playing it more!

Wow! The game looks amazing. Unfortunately, it runs poorly on my Radeon HD 4870 and Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 3.2 GHz. Performance is much better indoors than outdoors (no surprise there). As for image quality, the first thing I noticed was the lighting which looks noticeably better than BC2. The shadows looked better too. And of course, the animations were amazing.

Nice, now the rest of Neowin are in as well.

Forever alone. :(

How ya liking it?

Forever alone sucks. :crazy:

I have a feeling they may be regionally restricting it to NA/UK just as quick observe of neowin members getting in. I'm a 4 veteran, signed up for newsletter both battlefield, Medal of honor and gun club got origin account and whole sha-bang and nothing not even a casual news letter.

Their management and issuing of invites is pretty atrocious to say the least... If anyone gets one spare key on second account or something they don't need, if feeling generous I'd like to try it out.

Nice, now the rest of Neowin are in as well.

Forever alone. :(

How ya liking it?

Arrr they don't invite noobs :p

I've only played a little bit. Movement is completely different from BC2. I don't feel as agile, but I'm sure I'll get used to it. It's look glorious and sounds fantastic (I'm getting a new headset for it).

Killing people is somewhat harder, they are harder to spot. Or maybe my eyes haven't adjusted yet. Something feels off with hitting your target. Probably tons of other stuff as well. Those were my initial observations.

I'm still getting "WE'RE SORRY - YOU DON'T MEET THE CRITERIA TO ENTER THIS SITE" error while trying to get a key on https://bf3alpha.battlefield.com

Am I looking in the wrong place, or what :( ?

Me too, first BF game was 1942. Own all BF games with a veteran rank of 8 and played the crap out of BF2 online, also BC2. Own BC2 on Xbox aswell, have pre-ordered BF3 via Origin and Game.co.uk for Xbox 360. Subscribed to BF3 newsletter and EA newsletter ages ago and my email is verified. Also own MoH LE which I only brought for BF3 beta in September.

Apparently, I don't meet the criteria.

<Sarcasm>Maybe it's because the only Call of Duty game I own is Call of Duty 4? Pre-haps if I owned every Call of Duty I would get an invite.</sarcasm>

Anyway, don't care much. I hate Rush with a passion and I've heard the beta will use a different map with more vehicles... hopefully Conquest.

The beta nvidia drivers: http://www.nvidia.co...eta-driver.html

I don't see any mention of BF3 though :(

Damn, potentially not good at all.

A friend of mine has virtually the same exact setup as I do, same cards, and since SLi is currently not supported, the game is only running at 25fps on Medium. :(

This is a pretty good example of when SLi can sometimes be a pain in the ass, definitely.

As a fellow BF junkie and Vet... I await your impressions.. ;)

I stopped keeping my rig updated for gaming years ago (still on a FX-55);

So the console version is my only hope. Being this game appears to have been catered to the console player, I'm sure I won't be missing anything (I loved playing Commander in the 2nd).

Will do, you know I will say what I think.

I am really looking forward to checking it out tonight. I definitely will be playing it at some point. No doubt.

Also, does anyone have any idea when the Alpha runs until?

On the email invite, it says the following...

BATTLEFIELD 3 ALPHA TRIAL INSTRUCTIONS

Dates: July 19th - August 1st

So does anyone know if those dates mean when you can sign up for the Alpha, or how long it actually lasts?

From Demize99:

Cool, thanks for sharing, and also Happy Birthday. (Y)

Alpha does indeed end on the 1st. My guess is they move to closed beta in August, open beta September and then release in October.

A mid- to late-August closed beta would be amazing.

Also, be sure to fill out the BF3 alpha survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/P89YDV9

I expressed my concerns about the subway area. It's way too crowded and it's easy to die from a barrage of bullets as you run in. Basically, the defenders have a huge advantage if they set themselves up early with support soldiers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!