Battlefield 3

By Crisp
in Gamers' Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^But I often jump from 1 server to the other when I can't find a fun and lag-less server. Having to quit the game and search on the website for a proper server will make the process somewhat annoying.

Grand Master

LOC Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

you dont have to launch origin to launch the game. During the alpha i was able to go straight to the website and launch the game with out having to go through origin.

But to be clear, once you launched the game Origin was launched. At least that happened every single time I played without Origin running first.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

^But I often jump from 1 server to the other when I can't find a fun and lag-less server. Having to quit the game and search on the website for a proper server will make the process somewhat annoying.

Its exactly the same as how you do it in BC2, the webpage based server browser acts just like the BC2 one, you click on a server and it auto refreshes, you double click and you join. It takes the same amount of time but instead of dropping back to the main menu the game quits and loads just as fast. Soon as you double click on a server the client loads straight into the same screen you would get if you double click a BC2 server in game, the loading screen and after a few seconds you are in server.

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Its exactly the same as how you do it in BC2, the webpage based server browser acts just like the BC2 one, you click on a server and it auto refreshes, you double click and you join. It takes the same amount of time but instead of dropping back to the main menu the game quits and loads just as fast. Soon as you double click on a server the client loads straight into the same screen you would get if you double click a BC2 server in game, the loading screen and after a few seconds you are in server.

If it was exactly the same, it would be in game. Therefore it is not exactly the same, it is similar in function.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

If it was exactly the same, it would be in game. Therefore it is not exactly the same, it is similar in function.

Yes i know i was just explaining to all the negative nancies who havent played the game its not as big a deal as people are making out.

Grand Master

Digitalx

Posted
Posted

Sounds like it'll more of less be taking MP elements in relation to launching, content offerings and server browsing from battlefield play4free so it won't be too bad and it won't hamper speed or ability to switch servers.

By this I mean that sure it won't be "in game" but the game won't be constant full screen all encasing application.

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

By this I mean that sure it won't be "in game" but the game won't be constant full screen all encasing application.

What makes you say that? it absolutely does run full screen, that is how I was playing it towards the end of the beta. So the only way to get back to the server browser in Firefox, was indeed Alt-Tabbing, just like any other full screen app. Unless I was missing something?

It personally feel it is a ****ty system and see no need why an extra step needs to be added to the process. A process that has been pretty much a standard for years now.

I will use it, I actually have no choice now do I, but I absolutely prefer in game.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Its exactly the same as how you do it in BC2, the webpage based server browser acts just like the BC2 one, you click on a server and it auto refreshes, you double click and you join. It takes the same amount of time but instead of dropping back to the main menu the game quits and loads just as fast. Soon as you double click on a server the client loads straight into the same screen you would get if you double click a BC2 server in game, the loading screen and after a few seconds you are in server.

I rather see it in game as I don't want to have even more extra applications running in the background just to run a game. We're already forced to use Origin as well.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^That's not my point though. It doesn't have to do with my memory or CPU. I just don't like the fact we need additional apps running in the background only to play a game. I'll still play the game of course, but it's just something that I'll probably dislike.

Grand Master

ViperAFK

Posted
Posted

In the age of 4Gb+ machines it doesnt matter, the way windows manages memory makes it a non issue.

The alpha actually managed to use pretty much all of my 4 gigs. I was at 97% usage when I was playing. It could have possibly been a memory leak or something, but the game is supposed to be optimized for 64 bit. I've recently updated to ddr3 and 8 gigs though :)

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^That's not my point though. It doesn't have to do with my memory or CPU. I just don't like the fact we need additional apps running in the background only to play a game. I'll still play the game of course, but it's just something that I'll probably dislike.

Same here. Even if it does not have an adverse affect, I am from the days that it definitely does, hell, I use to run a script to kill unnecessary services back in the day just to make sure I was getting every bit of potential I could, so it just comes down to the fact that it bothers me. :laugh: I make a joke about it, but it is true though. Hell, I had an issue with Steam for the longest time just because IT was another process running. So I just do not like the idea.

The alpha actually managed to use pretty much all of my 4 gigs. I was at 97% usage when I was playing. It could have possibly been a memory leak or something, but the game is supposed to be optimized for 64 bit. I've recently updated to ddr3 and 8 gigs though :)

And I also noticed too that this game likes it memory.

Granted, I do not even turn my AV off these days and games run just fine, and I do sometimes leave Firefox open and use it on my other monitor, again though, just something I do not like about the whole being forced to do it.

Again though, I will put up with it, not the end of the world at all, I just think it is an interesting topic of discussion actually. Because as I said above, it is not even really about the performance aspect of it, I know it really does not mean much at all, it is about the mental aspect and how I am just conditioned from the good old days. Perhaps I am ust an old man who is stubborn to accept change even, but I do like my browser in-game. ;)

Grand Master

dnast

Posted
Posted

For people that maintain large browser sessions it could actually be a problem. I know people whose Firefox uses up to a gig. I've even seen it using over 2 gigs on somebody's PC (they probably had around 100 tabs open, though).

I'll most likely be getting it for the 360, though. I know it'd run like crap on my PC and I don't have the spare cash to bring it up to speed.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Same here. Even if it does not have an adverse affect, I am from the days that it definitely does, hell, I use to run a script to kill unnecessary services back in the day just to make sure I was getting every bit of potential I could, so it just comes down to the fact that it bothers me. :laugh: I make a joke about it, but it is true though. Hell, I had an issue with Steam for the longest time just because IT was another process running. So I just do not like the idea.

And I also noticed too that this game likes it memory.

Granted, I do not even turn my AV off these days and games run just fine, and I do sometimes leave Firefox open and use it on my other monitor, again though, just something I do not like about the whole being forced to do it.

Again though, I will put up with it, not the end of the world at all, I just think it is an interesting topic of discussion actually. Because as I said above, it is not even really about the performance aspect of it, I know it really does not mean much at all, it is about the mental aspect and how I am just conditioned from the good old days. Perhaps I am ust an old man who is stubborn to accept change even, but I do like my browser in-game. ;)

LOL! I've never gone to that extend :rofl: For me it's all mental as well, lol. I've been used to Steam ever since I needed it for my games. I didn't like the fact that EA was forcing us to use Origin either since we're used to having Steam now. What if all distributors and whatnot began to create their own Steam-like service? We'd end up with loads of extra software just to play 1 game. I'd rather see them building the server browser at least into Origin for that matter. Like the server browser for Source games in Steam.

For people that maintain large browser sessions it could actually be a problem. I know people whose Firefox uses up to a gig. I've even seen it using over 2 gigs on somebody's PC (they probably had around 100 tabs open, though).

I'll most likely be getting it for the 360, though. I know it'd run like crap on my PC and I don't have the spare cash to bring it up to speed.

I wouldn't understand it if people would leave all those tabs open when they're going to play BF3. Then I'd rather just close the browser and reopen it with only Battlelog in a tab.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

The alpha actually managed to use pretty much all of my 4 gigs. I was at 97% usage when I was playing. It could have possibly been a memory leak or something, but the game is supposed to be optimized for 64 bit. I've recently updated to ddr3 and 8 gigs though :)

Didnt for me and im using very similar spec to yours.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles

      By sphbecker · Posted

      I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end

      By sphbecker · Posted

      I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!