Battlefield 3

By Crisp
in Gamers' Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^But I often jump from 1 server to the other when I can't find a fun and lag-less server. Having to quit the game and search on the website for a proper server will make the process somewhat annoying.

Grand Master

LOC Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

you dont have to launch origin to launch the game. During the alpha i was able to go straight to the website and launch the game with out having to go through origin.

But to be clear, once you launched the game Origin was launched. At least that happened every single time I played without Origin running first.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

^But I often jump from 1 server to the other when I can't find a fun and lag-less server. Having to quit the game and search on the website for a proper server will make the process somewhat annoying.

Its exactly the same as how you do it in BC2, the webpage based server browser acts just like the BC2 one, you click on a server and it auto refreshes, you double click and you join. It takes the same amount of time but instead of dropping back to the main menu the game quits and loads just as fast. Soon as you double click on a server the client loads straight into the same screen you would get if you double click a BC2 server in game, the loading screen and after a few seconds you are in server.

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Its exactly the same as how you do it in BC2, the webpage based server browser acts just like the BC2 one, you click on a server and it auto refreshes, you double click and you join. It takes the same amount of time but instead of dropping back to the main menu the game quits and loads just as fast. Soon as you double click on a server the client loads straight into the same screen you would get if you double click a BC2 server in game, the loading screen and after a few seconds you are in server.

If it was exactly the same, it would be in game. Therefore it is not exactly the same, it is similar in function.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

If it was exactly the same, it would be in game. Therefore it is not exactly the same, it is similar in function.

Yes i know i was just explaining to all the negative nancies who havent played the game its not as big a deal as people are making out.

Grand Master

Digitalx

Posted
Posted

Sounds like it'll more of less be taking MP elements in relation to launching, content offerings and server browsing from battlefield play4free so it won't be too bad and it won't hamper speed or ability to switch servers.

By this I mean that sure it won't be "in game" but the game won't be constant full screen all encasing application.

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

By this I mean that sure it won't be "in game" but the game won't be constant full screen all encasing application.

What makes you say that? it absolutely does run full screen, that is how I was playing it towards the end of the beta. So the only way to get back to the server browser in Firefox, was indeed Alt-Tabbing, just like any other full screen app. Unless I was missing something?

It personally feel it is a ****ty system and see no need why an extra step needs to be added to the process. A process that has been pretty much a standard for years now.

I will use it, I actually have no choice now do I, but I absolutely prefer in game.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Its exactly the same as how you do it in BC2, the webpage based server browser acts just like the BC2 one, you click on a server and it auto refreshes, you double click and you join. It takes the same amount of time but instead of dropping back to the main menu the game quits and loads just as fast. Soon as you double click on a server the client loads straight into the same screen you would get if you double click a BC2 server in game, the loading screen and after a few seconds you are in server.

I rather see it in game as I don't want to have even more extra applications running in the background just to run a game. We're already forced to use Origin as well.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^That's not my point though. It doesn't have to do with my memory or CPU. I just don't like the fact we need additional apps running in the background only to play a game. I'll still play the game of course, but it's just something that I'll probably dislike.

Grand Master

ViperAFK

Posted
Posted

In the age of 4Gb+ machines it doesnt matter, the way windows manages memory makes it a non issue.

The alpha actually managed to use pretty much all of my 4 gigs. I was at 97% usage when I was playing. It could have possibly been a memory leak or something, but the game is supposed to be optimized for 64 bit. I've recently updated to ddr3 and 8 gigs though :)

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^That's not my point though. It doesn't have to do with my memory or CPU. I just don't like the fact we need additional apps running in the background only to play a game. I'll still play the game of course, but it's just something that I'll probably dislike.

Same here. Even if it does not have an adverse affect, I am from the days that it definitely does, hell, I use to run a script to kill unnecessary services back in the day just to make sure I was getting every bit of potential I could, so it just comes down to the fact that it bothers me. :laugh: I make a joke about it, but it is true though. Hell, I had an issue with Steam for the longest time just because IT was another process running. So I just do not like the idea.

The alpha actually managed to use pretty much all of my 4 gigs. I was at 97% usage when I was playing. It could have possibly been a memory leak or something, but the game is supposed to be optimized for 64 bit. I've recently updated to ddr3 and 8 gigs though :)

And I also noticed too that this game likes it memory.

Granted, I do not even turn my AV off these days and games run just fine, and I do sometimes leave Firefox open and use it on my other monitor, again though, just something I do not like about the whole being forced to do it.

Again though, I will put up with it, not the end of the world at all, I just think it is an interesting topic of discussion actually. Because as I said above, it is not even really about the performance aspect of it, I know it really does not mean much at all, it is about the mental aspect and how I am just conditioned from the good old days. Perhaps I am ust an old man who is stubborn to accept change even, but I do like my browser in-game. ;)

Grand Master

dnast

Posted
Posted

For people that maintain large browser sessions it could actually be a problem. I know people whose Firefox uses up to a gig. I've even seen it using over 2 gigs on somebody's PC (they probably had around 100 tabs open, though).

I'll most likely be getting it for the 360, though. I know it'd run like crap on my PC and I don't have the spare cash to bring it up to speed.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Same here. Even if it does not have an adverse affect, I am from the days that it definitely does, hell, I use to run a script to kill unnecessary services back in the day just to make sure I was getting every bit of potential I could, so it just comes down to the fact that it bothers me. :laugh: I make a joke about it, but it is true though. Hell, I had an issue with Steam for the longest time just because IT was another process running. So I just do not like the idea.

And I also noticed too that this game likes it memory.

Granted, I do not even turn my AV off these days and games run just fine, and I do sometimes leave Firefox open and use it on my other monitor, again though, just something I do not like about the whole being forced to do it.

Again though, I will put up with it, not the end of the world at all, I just think it is an interesting topic of discussion actually. Because as I said above, it is not even really about the performance aspect of it, I know it really does not mean much at all, it is about the mental aspect and how I am just conditioned from the good old days. Perhaps I am ust an old man who is stubborn to accept change even, but I do like my browser in-game. ;)

LOL! I've never gone to that extend :rofl: For me it's all mental as well, lol. I've been used to Steam ever since I needed it for my games. I didn't like the fact that EA was forcing us to use Origin either since we're used to having Steam now. What if all distributors and whatnot began to create their own Steam-like service? We'd end up with loads of extra software just to play 1 game. I'd rather see them building the server browser at least into Origin for that matter. Like the server browser for Source games in Steam.

For people that maintain large browser sessions it could actually be a problem. I know people whose Firefox uses up to a gig. I've even seen it using over 2 gigs on somebody's PC (they probably had around 100 tabs open, though).

I'll most likely be getting it for the 360, though. I know it'd run like crap on my PC and I don't have the spare cash to bring it up to speed.

I wouldn't understand it if people would leave all those tabs open when they're going to play BF3. Then I'd rather just close the browser and reopen it with only Battlelog in a tab.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

The alpha actually managed to use pretty much all of my 4 gigs. I was at 97% usage when I was playing. It could have possibly been a memory leak or something, but the game is supposed to be optimized for 64 bit. I've recently updated to ddr3 and 8 gigs though :)

Didnt for me and im using very similar spec to yours.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • What are you listening to?

      By cork1958 · Posted

      OK, back to normal now! Ozzy Osbourne - Flying High Again (Official Music Video)  
    • draw.io Desktop 30.2.4

      By Fleet Command · Posted

      The actual download size is ~130–180 MB, not 100 MB.
    • What are you listening to?

      By cork1958 · Posted

      Big change of pace for me! Gunnar & the Grizzly Boys - Standard American (Official)  
    • draw.io Desktop 30.2.4

      By Copernic · Posted

      draw.io Desktop 30.2.4 by Razvan Serea draw.io desktop is a downloadable security-first diagramming application that runs on Windows, MacOS and Linux. Creating diagrams in the desktop app doesn’t need an internet connection. This is useful when you are disconnected or when you must create diagrams in a highly secure environment, where data protection is of the utmost importance. When you use the draw.io desktop app, your diagrams will be stored on your local device. Because this is a stand-alone application, also designed to run offline, there are no interfaces to cloud storage platforms available. Of course, you can still store your diagrams in folders that are synchronised to your cloud storage if you wish. Easy-to-use diagram editor The draw.io apps work just like the office and drawing tools you are used to using. Drag and drop shapes from the shape libraries and drag to draw connectors between them. Drag connectors to add waypoints and set a precise shape and position, or let them reroute automatically. Double click and start typing to add a label to anything. Create tables and swimlane flows with a familiar tool. Style shapes and connectors with customisable palettes, sketch options, fonts and text formatting tools. Search for shapes, including in open-source icon libraries. Use our vast libraries of shapes and templates, organised into logical categories, to create a range of diagrams and infographics. Generate diagrams from text descriptions using our smart templates. Diagram faster with keyboard shortcuts. draw.io Desktop 30.2.4 changelog: Uses electron 42.4.1 Updates to draw.io core 30.2.4. Download: draw.io 64-bit | Standalone ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: draw.io 32-bit | ARM64 | ARM64 Standalone Links: draw.io Home Page | Project page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will soon allow some users to block Copilot from analyzing their Office files

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft will soon allow some users to block Copilot from analyzing their Office files by Usama Jawad Microsoft Purview is a pretty useful data governance, security, and management service that allows customers to gain enhanced visibility and control over their content. It's meant for commercial customers, such as organizations that are storing data at scale. As AI continues to expand and infiltrate every corner of a firm, many are a bit conscious about the technology gaining access to their confidential data. Microsoft is now making a configuration change that will allow such customers to rest easy. Right now, users within an organization have the option to apply Purview sensitivity labels (when available) to secure certain files and label them as such. For example, if you apply the "Confidential" label on an Excel file, the file will be encrypted, and a "confidential" watermark will be applied to it. So, if this file is shared with anyone, they are aware that its access is supposed to be restricted. Up until now, Microsoft was allowing some connected experiences, like its AI services, to analyze files, regardless of their sensitivity label. This is of major concern to most organizations, as a recent example highlighted how confidential emails with data loss prevention (DLP) policies like privacy labels were being uploaded to Copilot for analysis. As such, Microsoft is updating an existing Purview data label sensitivity setting that prevents "some connected experiences that analyze content", from being blocked completely from doing this. The label isn't changing, but the blocking is now being enforced across all connected services (including Copilot and other AI tools), and now extends to Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Files with the label applied already will get this enhancement automatically too once it becomes available. Microsoft has urged IT admins to inform their respective helpdesk and compliance teams, update internal documentation, and review sensitivity labels to ensure that they meet their respective compliance needs. This change is tagged as MC1297982 in the Message Center. General availability is scheduled to begin in a phased manner soon and will complete by the end of next month. That said, it is important to note that this only applies to commercial customers who have a license that allows them to use Purview.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      191
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!