Recommended Posts

I'm afraid Metro will leave many BF fans with a sour taste in their mouths after this beta.

Those that didn't get to play a second of Caspian Border, without a doubt will be left with doubt as to what direction this series has taken.

Seems the ones that are really enjoying Metro are the CoD types. Most of the time is spend in CQ combat underground. Like rats in a maze.

This isn't BF.

I feel they've done more harm than good by electing to have this beta at all.

Limiting the fan-base to Metro and not allowing the majority to experience a true "bf experience" found in CB is a huge mistake.

I could see alot of fans completely turned off by it.

For those true ol'skool BF fans in doubt that didn't get to play CB;

All I can say is BF3 is the real deal. Trust me, you haven't had a BF experience like this yet.

Video gameplay alone will not do it any justice. There's nothing like the experiences you'll find within the game.

Most of my awe moments weren't even in the heat of battle! The game will truly make a spectator out of you!

Played the beta for a while. Definitely better than BC2.

Some things I noticed:

No zoom toggle

Can't exit chat box by pressing ESC, you must press enter which sucks if you have something typed in it (seriously, haven't they learned yet?)

If you're at the deployment screen, your chat message doesn't go through.

Different types of chatting (All, Team, Squad) don't have an indicator over the chat box, sucks if you forget your binds

Hard to see enemies at a distance with the glowy and super HDR lighting system

Grenade throwing is awkward and you can't cook grenades

The arm/disarm bar on MCOM stations resets randomly (very frustrating)

Can't bind mouse3, mouse4, mouse5 (really??)

Still debating if I'm going to get this...

It's a beta damn it ... Most of these issues have been already fixed. The beta we're playing right now is an build from Gamescon.

And BTW, there is a zoom togle. Look in the options.

I'm afraid Metro will leave many BF fans with a sour taste in their mouths after this beta.

Those that didn't get to play a second of Caspian Border, without a doubt will be left with doubt as to what direction this series has taken.

Seems the ones that are really enjoying Metro are the CoD types. Most of the time is spend in CQ combat underground. Like rats in a maze.

This isn't BF.

I feel they've done more harm than good by electing to have this beta at all.

Limiting the fan-base to Metro and not allowing the majority to experience a true "bf experience" found in CB is a huge mistake.

I could see alot of fans completely turned off by it.

For those true ol'skool BF fans in doubt that didn't get to play CB;

All I can say is BF3 is the real deal. Trust me, you haven't had a BF experience like this yet.

Video gameplay alone will not do it any justice. There's nothing like the experiences you'll find within the game.

Most of my awe moments weren't even in the heat of battle! The game will truly make a spectator out of you!

Very well said!

It's a beta damn it ... Most of these issues have been already fixed. The beta we're playing right now is an build from Gamescon.

And BTW, there is a zoom togle. Look in the options.

well people are using this beta has a demo of the game, so EA should have given out a better beta client then... cause this is doing nothing but hurt them.

It makes me really, really happy to hear that the game shouldn't be judged on Metro. Having played that map a few times I felt like the game wasn't for me even though I enjoyed every other Battlefield experience I've had. Hopefully, Caspian Border isn't as bad. Metro feels like it's dominated by snipers, and the map feels way too like something from Call of Duty for my tastes. Don't get me wrong - I love Call of Duty, but it doesn't flow with Battlefield.

well people are using this beta has a demo of the game, so EA should have given out a better beta client then... cause this is doing nothing but hurt them.

Well I completly agree with you. They should have included caspian border for everyone. I saw videos of people playing it, and it looks freaking amazing.

713832725t.jpg

:D <3 UMP

Just so you know I don't think you have to screenshot either you can link to games battle reports like one I just played in for example

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/battlereport/show/247188/1/244017148/

Just so you know I don't think you have to screenshot either you can link to games battle reports like one I just played in for example

http://battlelog.bat...88/1/244017148/

Ahhh, I see. But can you only access recent Battle Reports? Or all of them - I can only access the most recent ones.

I think that Metro is a nice addition, its shows there not only making massive maps, that there appealing to the gamers which enjoy closer spaced games. You need to have a good strategy as attacking, as always with battlefield games, an initial rush and squad spawning at Point A and B can take them in the first minute.

Ahhh, I see. But can you only access recent Battle Reports? Or all of them - I can only access the most recent ones.

I believe they stick around around but only links to them in global report thing down bottom left shows newest ones i don't think there's any other logs of matches.

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/battlereport/show/251972/1/244017148/ :D

All I can say so far from the PS3 beta is.... **** All Snipers. :laugh:

O hell yeah lol, I think I went 0-9 against one guy who just always had the shot on me. To my shock I enjoyed playing it on the PS3 and might pick it up instead of waiting for a better PC.

First of all to everybody thinking of canceling their pre-orders, honestly wait for Caspian Border/Conquest! I know I know but honestly, as someone who played every BF so far, Caspian Border feels like a completely different game compared to Metro. And secondly, I wouldn't write Caspian Border off for the rest of the beta. They said that the testing is over, this could very well mean that they wanted to test if CB is ready for an Open Beta and release it later now^^ Yes, Metro is kinda bland and boring but if CB is any indication for the rest of the Conquest maps this game will be worth it's money, I'm sure! (and no I'm not a DICE/EA employee :p)

Extremely, extremely disappointed with the Xbox 360 beta.

The graphics are just... bad. Whoever said this would be a graphical triumph on consoles was dead wrong. There's an insane amount of pop-in, tearing, and extremely poor texture work. It doesn't hold a candle to something like Crysis 2 (to give a multiplatform example). It really does detract from the game because it's so muddy that players can sometime blur with the bad texture work, if that makes any sense. There's a lot of aliasing as well.

The gameplay is decent, but I hated both maps. Completely hated them. They're both ruled by snipers, and they're just poorly designed for player flow throughout the maps. There's no real consistent paths -- it's almost a maze in both, unlike previous Battlefield games. Hell, Battlefield 1943 was better than this. The controls really need to be tweaked, because there's some odd mapping choices. I didn't look to see if they can be remapped, but I doubt it. The best part of the beta were the sounds (truly amazing, to put it bluntly) and a top-notch display/interface appearance. There's a bit too many button presses for simple tasks like seeing the scoreboard, however.

I'm glad I didn't pre-order at this point. I know it's a beta, but it didn't leave me wanting to play the finished version.

Extremely, extremely disappointed with the Xbox 360 beta.

The graphics are just... bad. Whoever said this would be a graphical triumph on consoles was dead wrong. There's an insane amount of pop-in, tearing, and extremely poor texture work. It doesn't hold a candle to something like Crysis 2 (to give a multiplatform example). It really does detract from the game because it's so muddy that players can sometime blur with the bad texture work, if that makes any sense. There's a lot of aliasing as well.

The gameplay is decent, but I hated both maps. Completely hated them. They're both ruled by snipers, and they're just poorly designed for player flow throughout the maps. There's no real consistent paths -- it's almost a maze in both, unlike previous Battlefield games. Hell, Battlefield 1943 was better than this. The controls really need to be tweaked, because there's some odd mapping choices. I didn't look to see if they can be remapped, but I doubt it. The best part of the beta were the sounds (truly amazing, to put it bluntly) and a top-notch display/interface appearance. There's a bit too many button presses for simple tasks like seeing the scoreboard, however.

I'm glad I didn't pre-order at this point. I know it's a beta, but it didn't leave me wanting to play the finished version.

How did you play both maps on the 360?

Also, I personally did not see any of the graphic issues you mention on the 360 version, like pop in or tearing. Literally not at all. So I am thinking maybe it has something to do with one has their 360 set to as far as resolution?

Also, just one button press to see the scoreboard. Just press select once and either hold it for a second or do it fast, I forget which one TBH, but that one press will bring it up.

Extremely, extremely disappointed with the Xbox 360 beta.

The graphics are just... bad. Whoever said this would be a graphical triumph on consoles was dead wrong. There's an insane amount of pop-in, tearing, and extremely poor texture work. It doesn't hold a candle to something like Crysis 2 (to give a multiplatform example). It really does detract from the game because it's so muddy that players can sometime blur with the bad texture work, if that makes any sense. There's a lot of aliasing as well.

The gameplay is decent, but I hated both maps. Completely hated them. They're both ruled by snipers, and they're just poorly designed for player flow throughout the maps. There's no real consistent paths -- it's almost a maze in both, unlike previous Battlefield games. Hell, Battlefield 1943 was better than this. The controls really need to be tweaked, because there's some odd mapping choices. I didn't look to see if they can be remapped, but I doubt it. The best part of the beta were the sounds (truly amazing, to put it bluntly) and a top-notch display/interface appearance. There's a bit too many button presses for simple tasks like seeing the scoreboard, however.

I'm glad I didn't pre-order at this point. I know it's a beta, but it didn't leave me wanting to play the finished version.

I rarely saw snipers in caspian border, and its certainly not a map they could rule. When I played on pc it was mostly engineers. Metro is a crap map though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Zed 1.7.2 has landed with updated OpenCode models, bug fixes and other improvements by David Uzondu Zed 1.7.2 recently landed on the stable release channel, bringing a host of AI-related features including automatic context compaction and settings-based skill management, along with other things like better Markdown preview rendering and custom git commands in the graph view. Starting with the AI stuff, the developers introduced "/compact", a command that basically summarizes your conversation history on demand. This tool prevents your active chat window from hitting token limits by compressing older parts of the dialogue into a brief overview. In addition to that, the team relocated skill management to the settings UI, improving how the application communicates errors regarding those skills, and updated the OpenCode model roster to support DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Nemotron 3 Ultra Free. External agent users can also monitor context window cost metrics and delete individual sessions directly from their history. Right-clicking ref labels in the git graph now opens a context menu that runs different actions against selected targets, kind of how VS Code does it. Here are some of the bug fixes this new release brings: The active agent fails to auto-select when creating a new git worktree. A scrollbar unexpectedly appears on wrapped code blocks in the agent chat. Collapse indicators for project headers appear when performing sidebar searches. Bracketed ellipsis title prefixes fail to show the ellipsis icon properly. Project icons render incorrectly in the recent projects picker. Diff hunk controls appear inside non-editable commit view multibuffers. The software update button hangs indefinitely on the downloading stage. Restoring an agent terminal in a remote project triggers a sudden crash. Splitting a pane that contains an active commit view causes a crash. Linux Wayland freezes when trying to read the clipboard from laggy external apps. Zed is a "newish" code editor trying to break the massive stronghold VS Code has on the developer community. Funny enough, the editor was created by former GitHub employees who worked on the Atom text editor (which Microsoft killed in 2022, several years after it bought GitHub). The project officially hit version 1.0 back in April, introducing platform parity for Windows and Linux alongside deep support for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Pro 12 (inch), within a VM.
    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!