Recommended Posts

His drag shotting skill is insane.

... I'll be the first to admit that I'm not particularly good at Battlefield, but how is he hitting half these people?! He isn't even aiming at them, he's aiming (in some shots) about a meter behind, and then he flicks his wrist and it magically hits?

... I'll be the first to admit that I'm not particularly good at Battlefield, but how is he hitting half these people?! He isn't even aiming at them, he's aiming (in some shots) about a meter behind, and then he flicks his wrist and it magically hits?

Muscle memory. With enough experience you can judge by instinct when to shoot when doing drag shots.

Very nice video btw. According to his stats it isn't even a collection of some cherry picked clips to make one look good, guy's genuinely skilled.

... I'll be the first to admit that I'm not particularly good at Battlefield, but how is he hitting half these people?! He isn't even aiming at them, he's aiming (in some shots) about a meter behind, and then he flicks his wrist and it magically hits?

Once you become so use to the physics in a game, things like this become a joke... Yes, he really is just flipping his wrist and clicking, things like this were commonplace back during the Quake 2/3 days... I just didn't think i'd see it someday in a Battlefield game lol.

Once you become so use to the physics in a game, things like this become a joke... Yes, he really is just flipping his wrist and clicking, things like this were commonplace back during the Quake 2/3 days... I just didn't think i'd see it someday in a Battlefield game lol.

Reminds me of sweeping with the BR in Halo 2 after firing a plasma shot. Only rage could ensue. This is the same but on a different level.

But seriously... Screw that guy, he makes me not want to play at all lolol...

He's taking advantage of the game's physic engine flaws. You can't blame him for doing it, and it is still very impressive and difficult, but seriously... Screw that guy.

Also... His jump at 2:10... I would have committed suicide EVERY time. SCREW THAT GUY! LOL!

I did enjoy the music...

Did anyone else unlock the Melee Medal & Dog tag? Because I found out that the best way to do so is to get to Caspian, be on the RU side, get into a jet, fly to Antenna, parachute out, make sure you are well away from the Antenna itself, and then dog-tags galore from Recons camping @ the rocks... I have the Melee Medal and that is how I got most of my Dog-Tag Kills.

Also, Metro Meat grinders are the best servers for ranking up, go engineer and just spam rockets in the general direction of enemy, and either get kills and/or assists

... I'll be the first to admit that I'm not particularly good at Battlefield, but how is he hitting half these people?! He isn't even aiming at them, he's aiming (in some shots) about a meter behind, and then he flicks his wrist and it magically hits?

Yeah I have to say, I have personally never even heard of this style of shooting never-mind seen it in action. It is beyond bizarre. Sure it is impressive, but I just do not get why he has to do the whole drag thing. I guess he is proving just how good he is? Seems like an unnecessary addition to me. :laugh:

Did anyone else unlock the Melee Medal & Dog tag? Because I found out that the best way to do so is to get to Caspian, be on the RU side, get into a jet, fly to Antenna, parachute out, make sure you are well away from the Antenna itself, and then dog-tags galore from Recons camping @ the rocks... I have the Melee Medal and that is how I got most of my Dog-Tag Kills.

Also, Metro Meat grinders are the best servers for ranking up, go engineer and just spam rockets in the general direction of enemy, and either get kills and/or assists

Using explosives is not the best way to get points on metro meat grinder servers. FYI. Get an assault rifle of your choice and mow people down. Shotguns work good too. You'll easily get more kills than you ever will with explosives (m320 or rpg). And then when you drop a med kit and snagging revives when you can you'll easily be out scoring the people who are camping with their m320.

Using explosives is not the best way to get points on metro meat grinder servers. FYI. Get an assault rifle of your choice and mow people down. Shotguns work good too. You'll easily get more kills than you ever will with explosives (m320 or rpg). And then when you drop a med kit and snagging revives when you can you'll easily be out scoring the people who are camping with their m320.

If you shoot the right pixels you get way more points with m320. And if the medics do their job right you can walk away with 124 - 2 like i did.

Do some revives too for some extra points. Had 70.000+ in that round. Not one rifle bullet wasted.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!