Recommended Posts

Only counts if you are using a weapon that has the underslung attachment and you select the M320 instead of the med kit. M320 on its own does not count.

I'm going to disagree with you here. I'm using the M320 on it's own and I'm working on that assignment as well. I'm using the foregrip on all of my guns and I've fragged 8 people with the M320 on it's own so far since I've begun (I don't like using it on infantry that much). So using the M320 on it's own does count for that assignment as far as I know.

I also didn't like to RPG people for the 50 RPG kills assignment so I had a hard time doing that as well.

I'm going to disagree with you here. I'm using the M320 on it's own and I'm working on that assignment as well. I'm using the foregrip on all of my guns and I've fragged 8 people with the M320 on it's own so far since I've begun (I don't like using it on infantry that much). So using the M320 on it's own does count for that assignment as far as I know.

I also didn't like to RPG people for the 50 RPG kills assignment so I had a hard time doing that as well.

I just played a single round of 64 player metro conquest and got the needed rpg kills lol.

That's one way to do it, haha. But I wanted to make them at least legit kills instead of spam kills e.g. shooting infantry off of buildings and through walls etc (which I do in any normal game). But I've also been shooting it on groups of soldiers or at soldiers in the open which I'd normally frag with a gun. I was making an effort out of fragging people with the RPG in normal matches :p

I'm glad I'm done doing that assignment because I'll finally be able to play normal again. I'm now working on the last assignment for the Support class. I only need 24 frags and I'll be done with that one. The hardest one for me will be the last Assault rifle as I don't really like to play SQM. And the Recon assignments will be hard for me as well as I haven't played the Recon class all that much in BF3 yet. I was pretty decent with the Recon class in BC2.

I will never understand why people love the vehicles, im always seeing them shot down, i last a lot longer on the ground myself so i never try to fly or get in a tank.

If you're good in a tank you can change the game around on some maps, just have a good eng. with and you're golden.

  • Like 1

haha I went exactly the opposite. I spamed that thing like I've never spammed before, never even used my weapon through the whole game :laugh:

I get annoyed by people who do this XD But hey, it's for a good cause this time around, haha.

Also, SOFLAM + Javelin are very important in Wake Island. At least for the team that starts on the island it's important. I'm glad that in each team I've played in, there are at least a couple of Recon players who spawn with the SOFLAM and let the other players know about this.

Battlefield 2143 hinted at with Easter Egg

DICE is known for including various Easter Eggs on maps, especially little, vague ones to tease upcoming games. For instance, back in 2006 they included some Easter Eggs in Battlefield 2: Euro Forces and Armored Fury map packs, which hinted at a new title called ?2142? ? way before Battlefield 2142 was officially announced.

Source: Battlefield 3 blog

Now, I'll be taking this news with a grain of salt. It would be pretty awesome if the hint was actually a real hint. Imagine Battlefield 2142 in the Frostbite 2 engine. That would be pretty epic. But I'd imagine it would be kinda like the Vietnam DLC for Bad Company 2 where BF2143 is separated from both BF3 and B2K. Hopefully they'll be allowing to have the BF2143 maps in the map rotation for the current maps. Vietnam wasn't as packed with players as BC2 was which was a bummer IMO. Having the DLC maps all in 1 map rotation would solve that issue.

Just speculation here with how I'd like the map rotations to be IF the DLC would be real :)

It could be real since they've said that they would be making more DLC for BF3 than they did for previous BF games. Also, Lars Gustavsson, creative director of DICE said on Twitter in November that he had a weakness for the setting in BF2142.

I'd be careful with the visual tweak guide. PB/DiCE/EA have said that it modifies game files and strictly speaking you could be banned for it.

I've got more than 10 hours in, PB only games filtered, no issues. The guide states that it doesn't change anything other than the way the game displays it's visuals.

It's very much worth it... Changing the black levels to a point where you can actually see into the shadows was a much needed improvement... The color saturation is an amazing bonus.

Oh shi-

I loved 2142, the Titan gamemode was really fun having to take out its shields, then assaulting the forcefield controls before you can actually access the core to take it down.

tumblr_lul2t6Pjgz1qbofzr.jpg

that could be such a good game!! I really would be shouting take my money!

+1 titan mode was amazing, like rush and conquest combined! was epic!

Thatll never happen because those that dont have it will get kicked, i dont think people would be best pleased.

Back To Karkand is part of the normal map rotation as well. People who haven't bought that will be kicked as well then I suppose.

SQM is really hopeless. You really need to be lucky for joining a team that can actually win a match.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!