Recommended Posts

Players: 2-16

:wacko:

Perhaps I'm wrong but I don't think DICE realizes we don't want small tight maps full of choke points and low player counts. If we wanted that we would play Call of Duty.

This fall will also bring the expansion pack Battlefield 3: Armored Kill. Featuring all-out vehicle warfare with new tanks, ATV?s, and mobile artillery, it also includes the biggest map in Battlefield history. Come winter, it is time for the fourth expansion pack Battlefield 3: End Game.

Come back next week for the first gameplay trailer and screenshots from Battlefield 3: Close Quarters.

Biggest BF map ever? Of course we won't see it for 8+ months. People are already speculating that we won't see the expected march patch now until the first dlc is released. I want to say that won't happen, but they did the same thing in bc2.

I'm looking forward to

This fall will also bring the expansion pack Battlefield 3: Armored Kill. Featuring all-out vehicle warfare with new tanks, ATV?s, and mobile artillery, it also includes the biggest map in Battlefield history. Come winter, it is time for the fourth expansion pack Battlefield 3: End Game.

I want them to create like a Tank Deathmatch or something where everyone has a vehicle hopefully Armored Kill will bring something like that.

Close Quarters is the first expansion. There are two more after that: Armored Kill and End Game. All of the expansions should be out within the next 10 months. There's also a major patch on the way with tweaks, bug fixes, and optimization to the PC version. Whether that patch is released before or after Close Quarters is currently unknown. I wouldn't be surprised if it's released alongside it in June.

Close Quarters is the first expansion. There are two more after that: Armored Kill and End Game. All of the expansions should be out within the next 10 months. There's also a major patch on the way with tweaks, bug fixes, and optimization to the PC version. Whether that patch is released before or after Close Quarters is currently unknown. I wouldn't be surprised if it's released alongside it in June.

Which is irritating if they hold off on the patch for that long. I can't see any reason why they would need to do that though. But like I said, they held off patches in bc2 for longer for stupid silly reasons so it won't be surprising if they do.

Close Quarters is the first expansion. There are two more after that: Armored Kill and End Game. All of the expansions should be out within the next 10 months. There's also a major patch on the way with tweaks, bug fixes, and optimization to the PC version. Whether that patch is released before or after Close Quarters is currently unknown. I wouldn't be surprised if it's released alongside it in June.

They've already announced the patch is "comming soon" I can't believe it'd be later than the end of this month...they wouldn't make us wait till June.

I wonder if this article is true...

http://www.eurogamer...f-three-add-ons

Says consolers will be able to rent their own servers, with their own rules. Didn't know MS would allow such witchcraft.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Neq7LFDJxNg

Take your pick...

- USAS-12 Frags

- RPG

- SMAW

- M320

- Claymores

Or maybe, the 1HK snipers, which are being added to the game in the patch.

Blah. DICE/EA have officially ruined this series for me. I'm done with Battlefield. All they do is talk, talk, talk. Talk about a patch for months. Talk about DLC for months. All talk and no action. For those of us who hate choked up maps, the first DLC is worthless, so we're sitting on release day content through the early summer. Lame.

I really doubt I will spend money on this.

I like close-quarter battles, but this 16 player limit?

Should've been at least, at least 32 players.

Battlefield has so much potential in its own gameplay types, so why are they taking notes from other games?

I really doubt, I'll buy this

I wonder if this article is true...

http://www.eurogamer...f-three-add-ons

Says consolers will be able to rent their own servers, with their own rules. Didn't know MS would allow such witchcraft.

<snip>

16 player count isn't so much of an issue for the consoles...only missing a few players :)

But I'd like to see them up in to 32 on consoles in general especially if we're gonna be getting bigger maps in Armoured Kill...CQ does look as if its just to keep the CoD noobs who bought BF happy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfHjdjQiPko

Don't know how they got it. Looks lame. It also doesn't help that the person playing can't aim.

Please god let it be real. Was just saying how the game needed more QCB yesterday. I know several folk will moan and say, but itss not COD. Well all Im saying is Metro and Seine are my 2 fave maps, so this is all kinds of good if true personally

Please god let it be real. Was just saying how the game needed more QCB yesterday. I know several folk will moan and say, but itss not COD. Well all Im saying is Metro and Seine are my 2 fave maps, so this is all kinds of good if true personally

I think you're in the minority. Just about every bf3 forum I've looked at is blowing up with hate at these maps. For me though, I don't mind them so much, but the part that sucks that we have to wait 8+ months until we get the bigger maps.

If done correctly, the indoor maps could be a lot of fun for BF, especially if they're high-rise type buildings where you're attacking from the bottom up. I don't think there will be too many similarities to CoD... all of their maps are like two hallways where the game forces you to lob grenades and fire shotguns down. :s

I think you're in the minority. Just about every bf3 forum I've looked at is blowing up with hate at these maps. For me though, I don't mind them so much, but the part that sucks that we have to wait 8+ months until we get the bigger maps.

Kinda agree about the 8month part. Not too good, hell its june before we see any new maps. One thing i wish they had allowed was for some sort of mod tool, even if just specifically for maps. As altho im still by far learning the maps, i know theres a shed load of hardcore folk who,ll be the complete oppossite.

Still good of them to atleast tell us were getting stuff down the line, eventually.

I don't think there will be too many similarities to CoD... all of their maps are like two hallways where the game forces you to lob grenades and fire shotguns down. :s

huh? I don't find that in COD at all. In fact that's what I dislike about some of the tight maps in BF3, like metro. They seem to encourage the tight, cramped corridor gameplay.

Love metro due to the real power struggles you get. Reminds of the old CTF_Face maps in Unreal. Can see how people get put off due to base-raping etc but on Metro its part of the gameplay tbh and more a case of how well your team can battle out or get a sneaky drop on flag.

huh? I don't find that in COD at all. In fact that's what I dislike about some of the tight maps in BF3, like metro. They seem to encourage the tight, cramped corridor gameplay.

Admittedly I stopped COD after MW2, but mainly because it became everyone loading out with multiple grenades and dual shotguns sprinting down the corridors on any tight map.

As for Metro, sure there are some choke points that people will fling RPGs down, but you usually don't have to stack up there and try and force your way through. And, if you really want to go that route, you can usually count on someone reviving you, as long as the two sides are somewhat evenly matched.

Please god let it be real. Was just saying how the game needed more QCB yesterday. I know several folk will moan and say, but itss not COD. Well all Im saying is Metro and Seine are my 2 fave maps, so this is all kinds of good if true personally

Honestly, I kind of feel the same way. My favorite maps are Metro, Seine, and Bazaar. I just don't do well in big maps, even playing with friends. Most of the time I take a jet because that is the only fun I have in them. I don't care to much for tanks, and I usually use the trucks for C4 bait and drive them into tanks.

I generally stick to 24/7 metro maps, with high tickets, and no explosives or launchers. Every now and again I will go to a large map to pilot a helicopter for people (since I can't shoot with them) or play around in a jet, or to snipe.

I'm just hoping the Close Quarters maps will be allowed to up the player count in them, for absolute mayhem. :p

My beef isn't with Close Quarters itself - hell, Bazaar and Seine are my favorite BF3 maps - its just that I want them to release all 3 DLC pieces at the same time. For those who don't like the CQB stuff, what new maps will there be for them? None. I just feel like its a lame attempt at trying to NOT be like CoD..."Ok, we won't release a new game every year; instead, we'll just piece-mail DLC to make it feel like this game has infinite stay power."

Ah well, guess I'm just complaining to complain.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!