Recommended Posts

Hey guys i have been wondering something for a while now and i cant seem to find a straight answer anywhere on the internet of elsewhere...

I have been trying to figure out if i have a body with a APS-C size sensor in it (in my case the 7D) and i have a canon EF-S lens (again in my case the EF-S 15-85) am i actually seeing 15mm or am i seeing 15mm x 1.6 which would be 24mm? I know that if i had a 15mm EF lens i would be seeing 24mm but i cant figure out if what is printed on the EF-S lenses is what i am actually seeing or is it still being multiplied.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/978074-canon-ef-s-lens-focal-length/
Share on other sites

Yes, that's basically /thread

An EF lens at 24mm and an EF-S lens at 24mm will give you the exact same field of view and DOF characteristics on an APS-C camera (assuming all else is equal).

The only difference is that if you were to mount an EF-S lens on a Full Frame camera you'd get either vignetting or a cropped image (I don't know how Canon handles this).

And FYI: APS-C is 1.6x in Canon-land only, everywhere else it's 1.5x

Yes, that's basically /thread

An EF lens at 24mm and an EF-S lens at 24mm will give you the exact same field of view and DOF characteristics on an APS-C camera (assuming all else is equal).

The only difference is that if you were to mount an EF-S lens on a Full Frame camera you'd get either vignetting or a cropped image (I don't know how Canon handles this).

And FYI: APS-C is 1.6x in Canon-land only, everywhere else it's 1.5x

Yeah idk why canon has a smaller "APS-C" sensor thus making it 1.6 not 1.5.

Anyway thanks again guys! :)

The only difference is that if you were to mount an EF-S lens on a Full Frame camera you'd get either vignetting or a cropped image (I don't know how Canon handles this).

You can't mount the smaller lenses on the full frame cameras. Nikon you can.

Yeah idk why canon has a smaller "APS-C" sensor thus making it 1.6 not 1.5.

The smaller sensors are vastly cheaper to make, and the smaller lenses are vastly cheaper to make. So that's why the cheap cameras are cheaper!

The smaller sensors are vastly cheaper to make, and the smaller lenses are vastly cheaper to make. So that's why the cheap cameras are cheaper!

Canon's sensor is only a millimeter or so smaller than actual APS-C so there cant be that much of a price difference in manufacturing right?

And Nikon Refers to all if its APS-C sensor and related gear as their DX format right?

Canon's sensor is only a millimeter or so smaller than actual APS-C so there cant be that much of a price difference in manufacturing right?

Yes it can. The likelihood of a defect destroying a sensor increases with of it's size. Consider going from 15.00 mm to 14.00mm along each dimension. The square area drops from 225.00mm^2 to 196mm^2 13% change in area. The larger the sensor, the more significant a small change in dimensions are.

That's why you see thresholds in sizes of things like LCDs or camera sensors where the next size up costs substantially more. It's relatively easy to make a 23" HD display without defects, it's extremely hard to make a 72" panel which is why the much larger screen costs 10s-100s of times more than the 23" display rather than the 3-4x you might expect for the increased size, enclosure, etc. The size canon uses is probably doubly intrenched. First due to manufacturing concerns (which may not even be a consideration any more) and second due to history. Cameras aren't the sort of thing people take kindly to have changed on them. Upgrading from an early 2000s rebel to a modern T2i shouldn't change the behaviour of my lenses and I suspect that canon sees that as a non-option.

And Nikon Refers to all if its APS-C sensor and related gear as their DX format right?

Yes. An easy way to remember is that FX is fullframe, the F in "FX" stands for Fullframe! Process of elimination gets you DX as the APS-C sensor.

I'll throw this out there for food for thought... I wonder if it makes sense at all...

A third sensor size? One that's in between DX and FX. It would require FX lenses but would be a lot cheaper to make and still offer significant improvements over DX. Just a thought.... I'm sure the camera manufacturers have looked into it and decided to proceed with it or not.

Yes. An easy way to remember is that FX is fullframe, the F in "FX" stands for Fullframe! Process of elimination gets you DX as the APS-C sensor.

I'll throw this out there for food for thought... I wonder if it makes sense at all...

A third sensor size? One that's in between DX and FX. It would require FX lenses but would be a lot cheaper to make and still offer significant improvements over DX. Just a thought.... I'm sure the camera manufacturers have looked into it and decided to proceed with it or not.

It's called APS-H, some Canon cameras have it IIRC.

Just for reference purposes, on Sony-land you can mount APS-C (DT) lenses on Full Frame cameras and you can choose to have either a vignetted image or just part of the sensor used.

oh... Uhhh like what?

Just googled, it looks like they did use that size in their SLRs (EOS 1D series)

http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082410canon120mpsensor.asp

"Canon has announced it has developed a 120 megapixel 29.2 x 20.2mm APS-H CMOS sensor - the same size used in its EOS-1D series of professional DSLRs. "

BLAH BLAH BLAH, Ken Rockwell this, Kenrockwell that,

but his was the only site I could find that had a list of the 1.3x crop canon cameras, in the first paragraph there are some of the ones that have that size sensor

http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/1-3x.htm

Canon cameras using APS-H: 1D, 1D Mk II, 1D Mk II N, 1D Mk III, 1D Mk IV

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Canon_DSLR_cameras

The 1Ds series are the Full Frame cameras for Canon.

Additional info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APS-H#Multiplier_factors

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I did think about a Echo show once and it would be useful to see what my cameras see. But my brother got one and I changed my mind. Adverts and not really worth the price just to see my cameras. I have a load of dots and a Echo Gen 4, they will do.
    • I asking where you are from or live, because if you don't live in the U.K, why are you so bothered? That is another reason I voted out, E.U and people poking their noses in where they should not be. Sadly we still have it, Trump, and his cronies. Putin as well and no doubt others. It makes no difference what we believe, if we made the right choice or not, we are out. As I said to someone when the news first broke we have voted out, we just need to make the best of it. I have no problems with closer ties to the E.U, we still need to trade. Just don't want to be in their club.
    • So you think I voted out because i am anti-immigrant. I am fed up with those that come over and think that we owe them something. The ones that are at the moment coming over from France where they are already in a safe country because they think and no doubt will get everything chucked at them. While people who were born and bred here get very little. I have nothing against as i have said before those that come here and work. In fact I know full well that our NHS would struggle without them. I do have a problem with those that come over here and try to push their religion and their way of life onto us. My reasons for voting out was because of what the E.U is and is also becoming. I did not agree with Freedom of movement, not because I don't want people over here, but because people need to be checked before being allowed to cross borders and that goes both ways. But my main thing was because the E.U is becoming if not already a united states of Europe. The only reason countries like Poland and Romania joined was because they had no money. When my partner left Poland, she had nothing, Poland had nothing, that is why she left. Wanted to learn something and earn a living. The E.U would have us back according to Michel Barnier. https://www.euronews.com/my-eu...ator-barnier-tells-euronews Why are you so scared to say what country you are in?
    • I wonder what that line really meant...
    • draw.io Desktop 30.2.6 by Razvan Serea draw.io desktop is a downloadable security-first diagramming application that runs on Windows, MacOS and Linux. Creating diagrams in the desktop app doesn’t need an internet connection. This is useful when you are disconnected or when you must create diagrams in a highly secure environment, where data protection is of the utmost importance. When you use the draw.io desktop app, your diagrams will be stored on your local device. Because this is a stand-alone application, also designed to run offline, there are no interfaces to cloud storage platforms available. Of course, you can still store your diagrams in folders that are synchronised to your cloud storage if you wish. Easy-to-use diagram editor The draw.io apps work just like the office and drawing tools you are used to using. Drag and drop shapes from the shape libraries and drag to draw connectors between them. Drag connectors to add waypoints and set a precise shape and position, or let them reroute automatically. Double click and start typing to add a label to anything. Create tables and swimlane flows with a familiar tool. Style shapes and connectors with customisable palettes, sketch options, fonts and text formatting tools. Search for shapes, including in open-source icon libraries. Use our vast libraries of shapes and templates, organised into logical categories, to create a range of diagrams and infographics. Generate diagrams from text descriptions using our smart templates. Diagram faster with keyboard shortcuts. draw.io Desktop 30.2.6 changelog: Uses electron 42.5.0 #2452 Updates to draw.io core 30.2.6. Download: draw.io 64-bit | Standalone (Open Source) Download: draw.io 32-bit | ARM64 | ARM64 Standalone Links: draw.io Home Page | Project page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      145
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!