Recommended Posts

No, you don't?

Just look at the first option on the General tab in Options. Make sure it is set to show windows and tabs from last time.

All they did was remove the somewhat pointless dialog that asked you every time you quit, likely because very few people ever chose a different option on it each time.

Anyway, it seems n_K is asking to remove that ability entirely, which is silly. Would private browsing mode perhaps be appropriate?

People understand the this option in general is NOT what i want and is NOT the same.I don't want to ALWAYS restore my tabs from last session,i want to SOMETIMES restore them.For example: If i have 5 tabs open in the evening and i close the browser and go to sleep on the next morning i DON'T want those tabs anymore,but with the option in general i don't have a choice and i either have to close all but one tabs before i close the browser or close the tabs i don't want anymore when i start the browser.That is why i like to be able to to chose IF i want those tabs for the next session or not.And those that want the behavior you suggested can always just put a check in the prompt to never show up again and everyone is happy.

You also have to edit AERO.THEME afterwards, so it looks like this:

[VisualStyles]

Path=%SystemRoot%\resources\Themes\Aero\Aero.msstyles

Just to be clear, its not required that you rename the folder of the theme to Aero. You can keep the actual Aero, no renaming required.

So for exemple, C:\Windows\Resources\Themes\clsSharp\aero.msstyles works after editing the clsSharp.theme file with > Path=%SystemRoot%\Resources\Themes\clsSharp\aero.msstyles

I think all Firefox requires is that the *.msstyles file be called aero (and obviously the *.theme file be edited to reflect this), everything else can stay the same.

I renamed the Dream VS to Aero. I chose it because it has strong font shadowing.

post-4914-0-04522500-1306169751.png

The first snip shows the main menu of Fx 20110522 Firefox/6.0a1 with HW accel off. It renders exactly like default Aero with the blue and shadows intact but retains the hover effect from Dream. The second snip is Fx context with HW accel off. The third snip is Fx context with HW accel on. The fourth snip is the Google Chrome 13.0.767.1 context menu. It renders exactly like the desktop right-click menu with the font shadowing displayed correctly. The last snip is IE9. This is the text zoomed in:

post-4914-0-89087200-1306170469.png

It's the same order; main menu HWA off, Fx context HWA off, Fx context HWA on, GC context, and IE9.

Zoomed in, DirectWrite looks really mangled. I've been using Firefox nightlies since GPU acceleration started and have grown accustomed to it. There have been gradual improvements and for my GPU and monitor I prefer DX10 rendering.

I'm trying to decide if I should try out 5.0 beta, or just jump to 6.0 alpha/nightly? I really want the new smooth animation for moving tabs, which I understand is only in 6.0 for now. Is there any real reason I shouldn't install 5.0? Do I just install it ontop of 4.01, or will it install into its own directory? As long as my extensions will work, the performance improvements should make it worth it. Will they work? Someone mentioned a lot of crashing with Flash 10.3, so that could be a dealbreaker. Anyone else experiencing that?

Sounds like you're a good candidate for the Aurora channel, it'll have Fx6 on it very soon.

People understand the this option in general is NOT what i want and is NOT the same.I don't want to ALWAYS restore my tabs from last session,i want to SOMETIMES restore them.For example: If i have 5 tabs open in the evening and i close the browser and go to sleep on the next morning i DON'T want those tabs anymore,but with the option in general i don't have a choice and i either have to close all but one tabs before i close the browser or close the tabs i don't want anymore when i start the browser.That is why i like to be able to to chose IF i want those tabs for the next session or not.And those that want the behavior you suggested can always just put a check in the prompt to never show up again and everyone is happy.

Yes, I understand that. You're a pretty niche case though.

post-4914-0-89087200-1306170469.png

It's the same order; main menu HWA off, Fx context HWA off, Fx context HWA on, GC context, and IE9.

Looks like the third one (Fx context HWA on) is using greyscale antialiasing, which is messing it up. It's supposed to look like the IE9 screenshot.

Checked on my Fx5, it looks correct to me (like IE9).

Firefox custom draws it's menus, IE doesn't (and hence uses GDI regardless of the page content).

I assume the bug is down to how the visual style (or theme system) reports details of the menu theme, Firefox marks it as opaque or transparent based on what the theme/engine says (opaque content always gets sub-pixel AA, transparent content doesn't)

No, you don't?

Just look at the first option on the General tab in Options. Make sure it is set to show windows and tabs from last time.

All they did was remove the somewhat pointless dialog that asked you every time you quit, likely because very few people ever chose a different option on it each time.

Anyway, it seems n_K is asking to remove that ability entirely, which is silly. Would private browsing mode perhaps be appropriate?

It's not silly, I only want to save what tabs I had open and the session cookie information if I choose to save it, do you think it's at all secure to allow anyone to open up your browser and force a reload of sites you were on AND session cookies for those sites that by the RFC standard and common sense should have expired?

It's the ****ing stupidest 'feature' I've ever seen in firefox, and it's so daft I'm tempted to get a different web browser before they manage to create yet another ginormous security cockup.

But the Firefox Quit dialogue could be turned off.So people which use the restore tabs from last session option can just put a thick at "do not ask next time",and the others(like me)still have the option to save only when we want.This way both sides are happy.Why would you enforce something to the one or the other side when both sides can have it like they want to?

It doesn't matter WHAT you pick, you can still restore all your tabs next time.

I like the feature of that, from 3.6 and before where you can choose to save your tabs and session data, now it doesn't matter what you pick and the lump of **** will save it reguardless and allow anyone to open it by clicking that stupid 'restore previous session' button.

I renamed the Dream VS to Aero. I chose it because it has strong font shadowing.

The first snip shows the main menu of Fx 20110522 Firefox/6.0a1 with HW accel off. It renders exactly like default Aero with the blue and shadows intact but retains the hover effect from Dream. The second snip is Fx context with HW accel off. The third snip is Fx context with HW accel on. The fourth snip is the Google Chrome 13.0.767.1 context menu. It renders exactly like the desktop right-click menu with the font shadowing displayed correctly. The last snip is IE9. This is the text zoomed in:

It's the same order; main menu HWA off, Fx context HWA off, Fx context HWA on, GC context, and IE9.

Zoomed in, DirectWrite looks really mangled. I've been using Firefox nightlies since GPU acceleration started and have grown accustomed to it. There have been gradual improvements and for my GPU and monitor I prefer DX10 rendering.

Thanks for posting this. I got the renaming to work with the extra instructions. It has fixed the menu font and shadow but the context menu and certain website content are experiencing the same font issues as verified by your screens.

It doesn't matter WHAT you pick, you can still restore all your tabs next time.

I like the feature of that, from 3.6 and before where you can choose to save your tabs and session data, now it doesn't matter what you pick and the lump of **** will save it reguardless and allow anyone to open it by clicking that stupid 'restore previous session' button.

So again, why not use private browsing mode? That's what it is for.

No, private browsing does not keep ANY kind of history (well, it does actually). I want to be able to see where I've been before, and still have the option to save my tabs when I close firefox, but I do no ever want a feature that can restore my previous browsing session WITH session cookies.

Please re-read everything I've posted; SESSION COOKIES. If I choose to close firefox and save my tabs, I wish the session data to be saved, if not though, I would expect it to be deleted but it's not, so whenever and however firefox is launched, the previous sessions' tabs can be restored with FULL cookie session information.

So e.g. if you were signed into a bank, closed and didn't save your tabs when exiting and someone opened it 3 minutes later and restored your session, they WOULD be logged in to your bank account on the page you left it from (assuming you didn't log out) and would have full access to it.

And you're trying to tell me that isn't dumb? It's the most idiotic thing in the world I've ever seen mozilla do. BRB just gonna print a T-Shirt with my login details for my bank and wear it round town...

...

So e.g. if you were signed into a bank, closed and didn't save your tabs when exiting and someone opened it 3 minutes later and restored your session, they WOULD be logged in to your bank account on the page you left it from (assuming you didn't log out) and would have full access to it.

...

I don't think that can happen.

No, private browsing does not keep ANY kind of history (well, it does actually). I want to be able to see where I've been before, and still have the option to save my tabs when I close firefox, but I do no ever want a feature that can restore my previous browsing session WITH session cookies.

Please re-read everything I've posted; SESSION COOKIES. If I choose to close firefox and save my tabs, I wish the session data to be saved, if not though, I would expect it to be deleted but it's not, so whenever and however firefox is launched, the previous sessions' tabs can be restored with FULL cookie session information

If that were a risk to you, couldn't you set Fx to remove cookies each time you close it? The option is there.

(I would be surprised if bank websites worked that way though, and I suspect choosing not to 'show tabs from last time' probably never gave you this kind of protection)

Ah awesome, applied that and the sessions don't work, many thanks.

Still incredibly stupid that it's not enabled by default though.

"(I would be surprised if bank websites worked that way though, and I suspect choosing not to 'show tabs from last time' probably never gave you this kind of protection) "

They have a session cookie that changes about every 5 minutes or so, hence why I mentioned 3 minutes, and it would work, well, it works with mine anyway.

I'm loving the Fx 5.0 beta so far, its much more responsive compared to 4.0.

It seems more refined and polished compared to 4.0. I'm seriously considering making the beta my main browser.

But not much has changed in 5.0, its mainly under the hood improvements, I wonder why they numbered it 5.0.

4.5 is more like it.

...

But not much has changed in 5.0, its mainly under the hood improvements, I wonder why they numbered it 5.0.

4.5 is more like it.

Really, there aren't any conditions set in stone about when a version should change by 1, 0.1, or 0.01 increments. I'd say it's the maker's prerogative and leave it at that.

Anyone know if there are plans to drop whatever changes they made to the font system (it's in Aurora and Nightly) into Fx 5.0, or is it strictly for 6.0? I'd hope not as fonts look much better on Aurora/Nightly on my system and it's making me puzzled as to why the changes haven't hit beta. I've seen absolutely no downside to the changes and with the reception Fx 4.0 received with it's blurry font mess if I were Mozilla I'd be pushing these changes into every build possible, even stable! :laugh:

I'd love to just drop back to the beta channel as I can't be bothered with the addon hassles running Aurora/Nightly, but I simply cannot revert from these font changes, it's impossible for my eyes. I've just there cut back from Nightly to Aurora, as Aurora hit 6.0a2, and now has the font fixes.

^Why would they add it to Firefox 5 when it's something that's being changed for Firefox 6? :p

Well I may be naive and incorrect, but I assumed patches issued to Aurora/Nightly CAN make there way into the stable/beta builds if they are deemed fit? Either way even if I'm completely wrong I still can't understand not trying to get this patch into the more stable channels well before Firefox 6.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!