Recommended Posts

Will Fx 4.0.1 be offered Fx 5 or will I have to manually update? I know it sounds stupid but I prefer it to be offered as an update rather than manually update.

It will be offered.

Just updated to version 5. Sadly I think FF is getting uglier with each release.

Er, anything specific in Fx5? I don't recall anything obvious changing in the UI.

Great release. Its fast for me and no addon troubles here but then again I am launching it from a ssd and only use abp. :shiftyninja:

This combination is essential. The guy behind ABP is working so good that makes the addon like native Firefox's function.

Also, it gives you the fastest browsing experience across all browsers. Mainly because the blocker does truly block and as I said it embeds perfectly into Fx.

I've it installed on SSD too with a good processor ( i5 2500 ). The results are just instant browsing.

Not to mention what is coming... Like better JavaScript Engine and Hardware Acceleration mechanism.

In a while Fx will be more than perfect. Optimized and even more bugs-free from the major overhaul it got when 4 released.

In general, Fx 5 got around 1000 -mostly unseen- "bugs" fixed. This means optimizing.

They prolly thought the performance enhancements were worth the major jump.... I think it is so far....

32 tabs open duration 2 days...

post-361542-0-96400600-1308995977.jpg

but most will agree a 4.5 would have been more suitable.

Some of you may have noticed this but some sites (including Neowin) now show slightly more "condensed" text. It appears to be caused by this update for Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2545698

It's supposed to change the way some fonts are rendered in IE9 but it also affects Fx5.

Some of you may have noticed this but some sites (including Neowin) now show slightly more "condensed" text. It appears to be caused by this update for Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2545698

It's supposed to change the way some fonts are rendered in IE9 but it also affects Fx5.

Ah-ha! So I'm not crazy after all. I knew something was going on with IE 9. Thanks for the info.

...

It's supposed to change the way some fonts are rendered in IE9 but it also affects Fx5.

Since it changes the fonts, it actually affects the way these fonts are rendered in any app that uses DirectWrite (So IE9, Firefox 4+, Steam, etc.). No idea why Microsoft claimed only IE would/is affected in that KB article.

Some of you may have noticed this but some sites (including Neowin) now show slightly more "condensed" text. It appears to be caused by this update for Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2545698

It's supposed to change the way some fonts are rendered in IE9 but it also affects Fx5.

I opened IE9 and compared it to firefox and it was the same so I thought oh well maybe its me.

  • 2 weeks later...

Does anyone know why it lags when I close a tab? When the tab is closed it takes a few seconds for the other tabs to re-order themselves in the tab bar.

I don't know... maybe it's on purpose... but it really feels like the browser's code is a mess!

I hate the scrolling in Firefox... it takes pages forever to be scrolled up and down.

Does anyone know why it lags when I close a tab? When the tab is closed it takes a few seconds for the other tabs to re-order themselves in the tab bar.

hmm, in firefox 6+ the tabs don't re-size until your mouse leaves the tab bar, like chrome. But I don't think 5 has that change yet, so not sure whats going on there.

hmm, in firefox 6+ the tabs don't re-size until your mouse leaves the tab bar, like chrome. But I don't think 5 has that change yet, so not sure whats going on there.

5 has that change. I think that its stupid if you have multiple tabs open at a time. :/ Anyone know of a way to change it back?

5 has that change. I think that its stupid if you have multiple tabs open at a time. :/ Anyone know of a way to change it back?

Ah, I guess that is it then. I personally like the change. The reason behind it is that if you have a lot of tabs open and are closing many of them when it resizes it makes it more difficult to select the tab you want because they all move.

There's no way to turn it off to my knowledge.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!