is XP SP3 still a good OS for today's computing?


Recommended Posts

One thing I keep seeing in this debate is "search".... is it something you guys really use that often? :blink:

I've personally never used it :/ I know exactly where my files are, it's not that complicated if your files are somewhat organized (and believe me I have LOTS of files, I even kept my programming exercises from university :blush:).

XP search is slow.... but who cares?

Vista and 7 have a much faster search...

OSX had instant search since Tiger with Spotlight....I used it once after I installed Tiger to check it out....then I've used it a few times to calculate stuff hahahah (since you can give it formulas to pass on to the calculator app :p)

I agree. The first thing I do when I install any version of windows, is disable windows search/file indexing. It really only slows down file access. Much like the noatime fstab option in Linux, which prevents writes when merely reading files.

Well the machine in question is running Windows 7 Ultimate x86 with no disk thrashing, high CPU usage or additional memory operations. Granted though I dual boot with Ubuntu 10.04, which seems to be lighter on resources although not so you'd notice. However, don't state opinion as fact.

I'm pretty sure the disk thrashing was a Vista only issue (and it was HORRIBLE!). I've never seen it on Win7, but I've seen it often on Vista

PAE was invented and introduced into CPU lines long before XP was even written. Kludge? No. Unless you wish to label things such as SSE or virtualisation kludges too.

I use windows 7 on almost a daily basis, so I can assure you that my critique is genuine and earnest.

The aforementioned problems with 7 and Vista are ubiquitous. Superfetch tries to compensate for the poor performance by caching certain things. This gives the perception that applications are running faster, but that's simply not true. A few select applications might initially boot faster, but their runtime performance is generally on par or slower than XP.

What is a new version of Windows or any other software for that matter if not a series of patches (service packs) over time? SP2 and SP3 both added additional features to XP, not just bug fixing. The Windows code base itself, and yes, including Windows 7, is two decades old. So I suppose you could say Windows 7 is two decades old if you follow your logic to its natural conclusion.

Nice manners.

the technoligies under windows 7 are not 2 decades old it was beefed up allot from what microsoft spent 3 to 5 years developing for windows vista.

New audio Stack Framwork APIs

new Video Stack FW APIs

new networking stack

a whole slew of new stuff and features that allows future versions of windows to be more HW scaler scale better so yea

and many many new features came to windows 7 that sure on XP you can download a 3rd party program to give you the illusion of the same feature the issue being it does not work the same nore function the same

Also as far as battery life goes umm XP sucks at it a good friend of mine Adam put windows 7 on an age old laptop that well was the first to support DX9 well anyways with XP on it and set to laptop or what ever for as much usage as possible it last 3hrs 12min but with windows 7 Pro on it with everything turned on and the Batt settings set to Power saver windows 7 gets a good 5hrs 40min so that is a good 2hrs 52min more then windows XP so Tell us again all mighty and know it all Flawed

There's nothing wrong with an OS using more resources then its predecessor, thats why the standard memory amount is constantly rising, as well as CPU cores/clock, etc. Remember when RAM cards came in 64MB, and if you were hot ****, you had some 256MB sticks in your power house? Now you actually have to search for sticks as low as 256 (i dont think they make lower anymore, but its possible they still produce 128, not sure), and we have modules that go as high as 4GB, and maybe even 8GB? At the same time, we're not more for the larger, newer modules then we were for the older, smaller ones at the time. That's how technology works, and it always baffles me when people use increased resource consumption as an excuse to pass off a system.

As for program efficiency, aren't their tons of articles out there that aimed to measure software performance in XP vs 7? If I remember correctly, the end result was that most programs are either the same, or have differences that are negligible. A few run more efficiently in XP, and many run more efficiently in 7. Doesn't 7 tend to outperform XP in gaming, or am I just imagining things?

Would you mind explaining how that magically turns an otherwise good OS into a pile of junk?

I didn't say anything about XP turning into a "pile of junk" because support would be pulled. I'm stating that when support is pulled that means no more updates so it won't be "good for a long long time".

Only until 2014 when all support is pulled!!!

That's what they said the last time Microsoft extended the support date. If you think they're going to abandon so many users think again ;) I know a lot of Windows 7 proponents would love that to happen, but it's just wishful thinking plain and simple.

I didn't say anything about XP turning into a "pile of junk" because support would be pulled. I'm stating that when support is pulled that means no more updates so it won't be "good for a long long time".

And you don't know for certain support will be pulled. Microsoft has extended it before, and will do again if enough users still have it.

Hey, chill out everyone.

It's not a war of what is good and what is not, it's personal preference.

For me, Windows 7 works and is fine. I wouldn't choose to use XP over Windows 7.

People are attached to Windows XP because it's a constant. No matter how you look at it, XP is comortable and support for it from developers has been improving ever since it's release. Windows 7 is new and needs you to step out of that comfort into a matured UI with other things too.

I personally don't see why people are hanging on to XP. Support for applications you say? With ease, you can still make old applications run. Try the game, Hogs of War. It knows it's not installed on Windows 98 so it doesn't want to run. Compatability mode works. If someone can give genuine reasons why they will still use XP, then I am all ears (program compatability is not a valid reason).

But as ever, people will think what they are using is the best. They are right. It is the best... for them. Not for everyone.

That's what they said the last time Microsoft extended the support date. If you think they're going to abandon so many users think again ;) I know a lot of Windows 7 proponents would love that to happen, but it's just wishful thinking plain and simple.

Most of those would be corporate users though. Hypothetically if, after 2014, Microsoft find a serious security flaw that affects all versions of Windows do you think they'll release a patch for XP?

I would have to agree with some of the people on this issue-- Really depends on the hardware--now having said that I would say if over 5 years old then yes it would be a good OS... but on newer hardware I would say go Windows 7-- This laptop I am writing this on has a 1.9ghz Pentium M with 1 gig of memory-- and yes it would run Vista/7 just fine but I don't want to purchase it since this laptop came with XP. This laptop will remain with XP however should support be lacking or things don't want to work then I would choose to dual boot with Linux.

For home users XP doesn't really have a place anymore but I disagree that WinXP doesn't have a place in the business world. For a business the extra cost of Vista/7 isn't worth it (it doesn't really have any benefit for a business.....no Aero is NOT a benefit for them :blink: )

I believe the rationale is that the less memory the OS uses, the more can be allocated to.. you know.. the programs that actually do something.

You realize that Windows 7 can and will release memory it is currently using for any program that needs it? And that it grabs more memory in advance when more is installed? Two simple conecepts that seem to completely baffle XP Fans since the introduction of Vista. You just can't simply compare the numbers between XP and 7 and conclude that XP is more efficient (which is completely absurd), memory management works very differently now and has gotten much more flexible while XP is stiff old tech that scales badly with todays hardware.

For home users XP doesn't really have a place anymore but I disagree that WinXP doesn't have a place in the business world. For a business the extra cost of Vista/7 isn't worth it (it doesn't really have any benefit for a business.....no Aero is NOT a benefit for them :blink: )

That place is quickly waning, if not already. Windows since Vista has had superior security measures, and superior stability compared with XP. Plus, with XP on life support, many companies are already upgrading to 7. If anyone here thinks Microsoft will extend that 2014 cutoff date, they're mistaken. Under no circumstances should anyone be operating under the assumption they will.

There are many business cases to argue for Windows 7.

are games perform better on XP than on Vista/7 ?

Just my own guesstimations of course, everybody's hardware is going to be different. On my gaming rig, between XP and 7 (running DX9 games), really didn't notice much of a difference, if any. Plus or minus a few FPS depending on the game. If anything I'd say Win7 spends less time at loading screens perhaps.. just overall tends to get things started quicker. The only time I saw a framerate hit is with DX10/11 gaming since it's doing a lot more video processing, which is to be expected. Can't compare to XP obviously as it's never going to support the later platforms. Can't say sticking to XP just because of gaming is a good reason, have yet to find anything that doesn't run well under 7.

No comments on XP versus Vista though.. skipped that one, hated it.

Just my own guesstimations of course, everybody's hardware is going to be different. On my gaming rig, between XP and 7 (running DX9 games), really didn't notice much of a difference, if any. Plus or minus a few FPS depending on the game. If anything I'd say Win7 spends less time at loading screens perhaps.. just overall tends to get things started quicker. The only time I saw a framerate hit is with DX10/11 gaming since it's doing a lot more video processing, which is to be expected. Can't compare to XP obviously as it's never going to support the later platforms. Can't say sticking to XP just because of gaming is a good reason, have yet to find anything that doesn't run well under 7.

No comments on XP versus Vista though.. skipped that one, hated it.

Can't recommend sticking to XP at all for gaming, unless you want to continue playing older games. The new batch of games coming along look to be moving away from DX9 - meaning no XP support. Battlefield 3 being a prime example. BF3 is DX10/11 only.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
    • Beats Studio Pro wireless over-ear ANC headphones drop to their lowest price yet by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Beats Studio Pro headphones at their all-time low price. The Studio Pro use 40mm active drivers which are designed to improve clarity and reduce distortion compared to previous models, with up to an 80% improvement over the Beats Studio3 Wireless. A built-in digital processor adjusts frequency response to keep the sound balanced rather than overly boosted in any one area. They also include Active Noise Cancelling that adapts to your surroundings to reduce background noise along with a Transparency mode that lets outside sound in when you need awareness of what’s going on around you. Furthermore, the headphones support personalised Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking as well as Dolby Atmos playback on supported content. Moreover, built-in voice-targeting microphones improve call quality. You can also switch between three sound profiles including Beats Signature for balanced music playback, Entertainment for films and gaming, and Conversation for clearer voice in calls and podcasts. Physically, they are designed to be worn for long periods without feeling heavy or awkward. The ear cushions use UltraPlush engineered leather while metal sliders allow you to adjust the fit. On the connectivity side, the Studio Pro use Class 1 Bluetooth for a stable, long-range wireless connection. There is also a 3.5mm input if you want to plug in directly, including use with in-flight entertainment systems. Controls are located on the headphones and include a "b" button for music and call control, a volume rocker, and a multifunction button used for switching listening modes, EQ settings, power, and pairing. In addition, the headphones offer integration with both Apple and Android devices. On Apple devices, they support one-touch pairing with iCloud-linked devices, hands-free Siri access, Find My tracking based on last connected location, and automatic software updates. On Android devices, they support Google Fast Pair, Audio Switch between compatible devices, and Google Find My Device tracking, with additional features available through the Beats app. When it comes to the battery performance, it is rated at up to 40 hours of listening time with ANC turned off, and up to 24 hours with ANC or Transparency mode enabled. A 10-minute Fast Fuel charge should provide up to 4 hours of playback. Finally, the headphones use a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and charge via USB-C. Beats Studio Pro Wireless Over-Ear ANC Headphones: $149.95 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • "lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days" Wasn't it "indefinitely"?
    • Those extra reboots are related to the UEFI Secure Boot certificate update thing.
    • Hands on with the ProtoArc EM25: Affordable ergonomic mouse that focuses on the right things by Taras Buria ProtoArc is known for making all sorts of office products with a big focus on ergonomics and comfort. Its latest product, the EM25, promises a comfortable-to-use, affordable, and customizable mouse. We took one for a spin; here are our impressions. The ProtoArc EM25 is a $49.99 mouse, but right now, during Prime Day 2026, you can get it for just $37.99. Right off the bat, you can see that the EM25 is inspired by Logitech's MX Master lineup and the legendary MX Master 3/3S. Its shape and proportions are very similar, so for a person with large hands (right-handed person, mind you), the EM25 is very comfortable to use. The mouse fills the palm, and the thumb rests on a small extension, giving your wrist a small tilt to reduce strain. The mouse is made of black plastic without any coating, eliminating long-term wear concerns. However, I can see the main buttons and other areas you touch the most getting polished over time. Despite its size and bulk, the mouse is not too heavy. It weighs about 100 grams, which is significantly less than the MX Master 3S and its successor. It is no lightweight gaming mouse by any means, but it is not excessively heavy like the MX Master 4. The EM25 has a built-in storage for its USB dongle. It is a cleverly made magnetic flap that you open by simply pressing on it. Next to the flap, you will find the on/off switch, the 1,000 Hz sensor, and a DPI button (up to 8,000 DPI). I find the DPI button location a bit odd, and I would prefer it somewhere below the main scroll wheel. Still, given that I never change DPI on my mice, I will let it pass. What is more important is that, unlike MX Master 3/3S/4, the device switch button is located below the left-click button, which allows you to switch devices without lifting and flipping the mouse. For a multi-device setup, this is a perfect solution: the button does not require too much effort to use, it does not get in your way, but it is also easily reachable with your thumb. The main scroll wheel has two modes: ratcheted and free-flow. You can only change between them with a bright orange button (I like this little touch of color), which is sprung and requires some effort to press. The wheel is dead-silent in free-flow mode, but ratched is quite loud and stiff, perhaps even too much to my liking. I can hardly call it deal-breaking, but it will certainly take some time to get used to. The side scroll wheel, it is notched, silent, and pleasant to use. Next to it, you can find a piece of glossed plastic with connection indicators: Dongle, Bluetooth 1, Bluetooth 2, and the low battery indicator. By the way, the built-in battery is rechargeable via a USB Type-C cable, which is included. It is sleeved and has an orange velcro strap to keep it tidy. After using the EM25 for a few weeks, I can say that its main buttons are my absolute favorite. They have very pronounced clicks, which feel great with just the right amount of force required to register a press. I would say they feel like something in between regular mouse clicks and silent ones. You can hear and feel the springy switch, but it is not sharp or loud to the point of annoying you. As for back/forward and device switch buttons, they are very clicky and quite noisy. Unfortunately, there are no extra buttons that you can map to specific things like in the MX Master lineup. Besides great primary clicks, another thing I like about the EM25 is its 1,000 Hz sensor. In the world, where Logitech still uses 125 Hz sensors in $100+ mice, seeing a much faster sensor in a mouse that costs three times less is very refreshing. Also, all the settings and customization you make are stored on-device, and you do not need to install any software. Just open the web-based app and change all that you need. Speaking of customization, you can remap what buttons do, adjust the DPI, and the sensor speed. Sadly, gestures are not supported, but you can still map pretty much anything to each button, including shortcuts, media buttons, and more. I also recommend using software like XMouseControl, as it will let you remap the side scroll wheel. At the end of the day, the ProtoArc EM25 is a great mouse. Clearly inspired by the MX Master lineup, it takes the best of it and complements it with a much more wallet-friendly price tag, significantly better sensor, on-device memory, a built-in storage for the dongle, and more (it fixes everything that I complained about the MX Master 4 recently). And for only $37.99 during Prime Day, the EM25 is an easy recommendation. Buy ProtoArc EM25 mouse - $37.99 | 24% off with Prime As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!