Please neowin start linking sources properly


Recommended Posts

Hi

Its just something I noticed in a lot of news articles that drives me nuts. Please please please start putting source links at the end of the article.

I know you do link sources in the articles text but come on please put "Source: Link" at the bottom as well. Thanks to the use of those awful text ad's by vibrant its very hard to spot the links from the crap it peddles so my mouse automatically avoids all links in the articles now. It drives me that nuts (vibrant) that I have even been tempted to block those ads but I hope common sense here could pre-vale.

At example of poor linking is here: https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-internet-explorer-9s-industry-leading-energy-efficiency

Why did the author not make the Image Source a proper link to the source is beyond me but I cant see any real reason not to if you put the text there anyway.

The cynic may say you want us to put our mouse all over the vibrant links to find the proper link but I wouldnt think neowin would resort to silly tactics like that and this is more an oversight.

An explanation for the policy at least would help if your not going to start linking sources in the usual standard manor as this seems to be the only site I use regularly that doesnt link to sources in the usual (imo proper) way. Hell even people posting in back page etc use this standard approach...

Dont take this too harshy but it really is driving me nuts and I dont want to start blocking ad's as that helps no one.

We have been doing in-line source citation for years, the source is clearly stated in the article. You're post also portrays that we just started doing this, for the past two years (or more) we have been using this method and haven't had any complaints until now.

To be honest, one benefit we get, or at least noticed to a slight degree, is that people actually read the news if we use source in-line citation. It sounds odd but if we have a title, and a source at top/bottom, people see title, see source, make judgement without reading the content. It still happens but it did help initially when this other format was adopted.

If you really have a problem with the adverts, you could always purchase a sub2 (cheesy plug i know)

We have been doing in-line source citation for years, the source is clearly stated in the article. You're post also portrays that we just started doing this, for the past two years (or more) we have been using this method and haven't had any complaints until now.

To be honest, one benefit we get, or at least noticed to a slight degree, is that people actually read the news if we use source in-line citation. It sounds odd but if we have a title, and a source at top/bottom, people see title, see source, make judgement without reading the content. It still happens but it did help initially when this other format was adopted.

If you really have a problem with the adverts, you could always purchase a sub2 (cheesy plug i know)

Thanks for the reply, I just find it a bit messy since the vibrant ad's match the colour of source links too. I am all for including the links into the article too but I personally read all of the article then sometimes desire to read a bit further into the topic if the news post has been more lightweight then the source and thats when the pain occurs. I will be honest and say the name of the source is clearly stated but I find the actual link to the source unclear due to the vibrant ad's. Maybe if the source was even bolded it may help me spot the link.

I know I could subscribe (which I am considering anyway, down with ad blocks sucking the life out of the net :) ) but I would hazard the assumption most of your user base dont and would likewise find it annoying even though most wont post about it, they may just move on. I am surprised it has not been mentioned before but I didnt take the time to post ages ago when I noticed the trend :)

It was the article today that really forced me to post as I tbh thought it was silly having the text at the bottom without a link.

I know people may just jump to the source and glance your article but is it really the worst thing in the world? You get the hit on the article and the advertising side as well as the fact in the eyes of the reader your reputation has increased anyway as you were the ones that brought the source to their attention.

I am sure you would like other sites to link more clearly to neowin when they take a similar approach to neowin exclusive news as that would drive traffic to you.

As they say spread the love :)

You could subscribe, or disable the in-line ads.

Yep I could and that would solve the issue for me but then neowin wouldnt have my feedback about the approach which I hope they find constructive and useful even if it doesnt result in a change in policy.

If no one takes the time to tell neowin we find it annoying then they will never know ;)

I think the problem has only arisen now as the intellitext links used to be green, and they seem to now have changed to match our inline link colour, I'll poke someone and see if we can find a way to change them back.

I agree with OP. "Hiding" the links inline is almost a cheap way of not fully crediting the site the article came from. It just seems a bit amateurish to me, which, granted, Neowin is, but still. Consider what you learned in school about citations. A works cited page would be included for easy referral of where the information came from, as a source link should be posted at the bottom. Even when you do in-text citation, you should be a little more obvious that you're getting the information from a certain source other than just a link to that page in the middle of the text.

Yep I could and that would solve the issue for me but then neowin wouldnt have my feedback about the approach which I hope they find constructive and useful even if it doesnt result in a change in policy.

If no one takes the time to tell neowin we find it annoying then they will never know ;)

I'd much rather you voice a concern, it's legitimate, but unless we see a massive uprising to move our sources to the bottom and away from inline text, we will probably stay the current course. If someone else links to us, very rarely does that drive traffic to the site in mass volumes, it helps with our pageranks sure, but as for a single link on a website as a source at the bottom, it doesn't bring much to the site in terms of visitors compared to our normal traffic bumps (unless it's reddit/digg/google news).

My impression of the 'Image Credit' text was that it would be linkified to a source if it differed from the story's own sources. Otherwise it remains as static text - that's why I did not put in a link.

One thing I could suggest as a change is that inline sources be bolded to better differentiate what is a link, what is the link to the source, and what is Intellitxt.

post-166635-0-77406800-1301518557.jpg

So... I'm the only person who sees the double lines of an ad-link, even though they are the same color now? I too remember when they were green, but there is still a way to avoid them. It's not completely deceptive.

[edit to add]

No, I don't run any extensions or anything. It's the default for Firefox 4.

I don't know about everyone else but on sites which feature a list of any sources at the bottom of the article, I generally look at the title first, read the first paragraph and if it's interesting enough, the whole article then go to the site which the content originated from.

I'd rather read the content on the site I'm already on, clicking on the source outright is too much hassle and I think there's quite a diverse amount of sources on neowin articles so I can't see how people would judge the content based on the source so quickly...

I think it's fairer to outright list the source url too, feels more honest to me.

I don't agree with the source at the bottom but the intellitxt ads should NOT be the same colour as the article links. Someone has clearly changed that recently to try and get more people to click them...

We haven't touched the colours, and we're looking into how to get it changed back.

I would prefer to have sources cited at the end of posted news as well. Original content =/= regurgitation from other news sites. Seems like one of these posts asking the staff to go back to how it was in 2008 when sources were listed clearly always get a bunch of folks saying +1, but nothing ever happens so w/e.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!