Where does Linux stand in your life?


  

136 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you run Linux?

    • Primary and Only OS used on main system
    • Dual Booting with another OS (Windows/Mac OS)
    • Running in Virtual Machine (Virtual Box, VMWare on Windows/Mac OS)
    • Other? (please detail below)


Recommended Posts

Hate Linux. Had so many nightmares and I can't be bothered to go google just to search for some idiot commandline method to do some petty tasks. Ubuntu may have improved but still far away compared to easiness of Windows and OSX.

Actually one of the reasons I like *Nix in general.. the tools available at a terminal level are absurdly powerful. Nothing "idiot" about it, once you get the hang of it you can do things so much quicker than by clicking through various dialogs and windows, or if you're trying to do something fairly complicated it's typically near impossible to do automatically through a GUI. Although I do agree with your point, there are a few areas yet that could use better "GUI refinement" so novice users wouldn't have to bring up a terminal in the first place if thats their choice.

Hate Linux. Had so many nightmares and I can't be bothered to go google just to search for some idiot commandline method to do some petty tasks. Ubuntu may have improved but still far away compared to easiness of Windows and OSX.

Suppose this is could be the fault of Windows and OSX for making the end user lazy, and just happy to click a few GUI buttons just to make life easier. :rolleyes:

If we all were brought up using command line, and terminal we'd thing Linux was the best thing since slide bread.

Just a thought.

It was mainly a server situation with me at the moment, though that might be changing. I am not sure. I have it with intranet server, backup server elect. My main two systems are Windows based, though I do have a couple of VMS with various distros.

Actually one of the reasons I like *Nix in general.. the tools available at a terminal level are absurdly powerful. Nothing "idiot" about it, once you get the hang of it you can do things so much quicker than by clicking through various dialogs and windows, or if you're trying to do something fairly complicated it's typically near impossible to do automatically through a GUI. Although I do agree with your point, there are a few areas yet that could use better "GUI refinement" so novice users wouldn't have to bring up a terminal in the first place if thats their choice.

A bit ago I was having a conversation with a friend as to why the terminal browsers sucked so much. The whole premise of using Linux without X is fantastic in its own way. You can actually have a mostly fully functioning "desktop" setup with only the terminal and programs that run in it. Pidgin has a CLI client. There's of course VI/Emacs/Nano. File browsing is obvious. MPlayer can play mostly any audio or video file due to having a framebuffer frontend for the video. All of this covers most of the standard "Desktop". What's missing is a solid CLI browser. I thought it so odd that if there's an API to render a video file then why hasn't it be suited to a browser? From what I was told by said friend, a browser implementation of this would be unbelievably complicated. Nonetheless, I found it odd that nobody had tried to make a more "modern" CLI browser. It seems like Linux is filled with strange implementations of everything simply for the "Just because we can" reason. I really thought some insane nerd would take up the crazy and generally redundant task of implementing a modern browser in the terminal.

Well, today I have learned that such a browser exists. http://links.twibright.com/features.php

The standard links2 browser has a "graphical" mode that's activated with the -g flag. With the proper backend, defaulting to either "fb" or "directfb" 'display backend' (who am I to know the difference), you get a CLI browser with a mouse and the ability to render picture files of most kinds. I haven't spent too much time with it but most sites are quite readable, and all of this done in the Linux terminal.

I love Linux for having such an incredibly powerful terminal environment. With all of this, if your graphics driver blows up or the xserver breaks for some unkown reason, you can go about all your normal "desktop" tasks as if nothing went wrong. It's amazing. It's also all in the terminal. So cool. I love the terminal.

I removed the crippled Linux distro they supplied with my netbook and installed the more useful Ubuntu distro which I use on a daily basis. I set up Centos on my VPS which hosts a few commercial websites and I set up Debian on my home server. My main PC is Windows though.

I'm now using Ubuntu exclusively (I was using Windows 7 Enterprise x64 SP1). I just installed 11.04 beta 2, it runs fast and smooth and my wired and wireless both work when I need them to. I'm now anxiously waiting on the final to be released in a couple of weeks.

It's definitely been a slight learning curve (about as much as going from XP to Vista was for me), but fortunately there are a lot of online resources available and I feel very comfortable using Linux now.

I do 99% of my work within Linux. I do still have Windows 7 installed for the occasional gaming weekend, but such events are beginning to grow months apart. I feel I will remove it soon so I can use the drive space to experiment with different distributions.

Currently dual booting my laptop with Windows Vista (sadface) and Ubuntu 10.10, however the Windows partition has been giving me all sorts of problems for a long time so I think I'm just going to ditch it and go Ubuntu-only; definitely interested in trying 11.04, too. I would quite like to go completely Windows-free but I'm obliged to use Microsoft Office 2007 with Endnote referencing software, and while OpenOffice is a competent alternative to Microsoft Office it's not quite there and the compatibility between the two is sometimes a bit iffy. As a result I have a netbook running Windows 7 with Microsoft Office.

"Where does linux stand in your life?"

In my trashcan. :D

No, seriously. Its only something I play around with now and then but I still use Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 as my primary operating systems. I do have OS X 10.6.7 installed on my desktop but rarely boot into it. Once you get a hackintosh working its not as much fun anymore. :(

The only computer I have (besides my iPad, iPhone, and iPod), is a MSI Wind U100-420 Netbook with upgraded RAM to 2 GB and upgraded Hard Disk Drive to 500GB. I triple boot Apple Mac OS X (Snow Leopard 10.6.7), Microsoft Windows 7 (Ultimate Edition), and Linux Mint 9 (Isadora LTS Edition) on it. Mac OS X is my primary operating system I use on a daily basis. I have Windows 7 around for extensive gaming and compatibility with the outside world. I have Linux around for fun, experimenting, learning, and just general all around hacking. I love my setup and it works well for me. I hope my next computer system is a full Apple branded one. Note: I do a lot of experimenting with Linux on removable media like USB thumb drives and SD memory cards. I have MS-DOS 7 on a SD Mem Card, Arch Linux on a SD Mem Card, and all the above mentioned OS installations on USB thumb drives. I can pop in a SD card whenever I'm feeling nostalgic and wanna boot into a strictly DOS environment to use programs like AUTO MENU or the old school MS Works or old DOS games. The same can be said for Arch Linux; I can just pop it in and boot up and there I am in a full blown Linux Environment! And if my system ever becomes unstable or needs repair, I have Windows 7 Installation on a USB Thumb Drive, I have Mac OSX installation on a Thumb Drive, and I have Linux Mint Installation on a Thumb Drive; makes reinstallations fast and easy.

Here is a basic Idea of what my boot screen looks like (Not Exactly, as I have different Labels like "Macintosh" instead of "OSX" or "Leopard", no Chameleon Disc option, and I'm not running in a Virtual Box; but you get the idea. It was the only screens I could find and I don't know how to take snap shots at boot.):

post-125102-0-75460000-1302987780.jpg

post-125102-0-35992400-1302987805.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!