Recommended Posts

the answer is 2 my noob friends :) 48/2(9+3) 9+3=12 its not done yet, 12 inside parenthesis is multiplying by 2. you have to keep simplyfing until its done. 12*2 =24 48/24 = 2. even with the distribution... 2*9 + 2*3 2 is part of it and must be dealt with first and simplified - 18 + 6 = 24. 48/24 = 2. You people getting 288 or whatever are wrong.

So do you trust a calculator more than a human?

How bout multiple calculators? in the second image I didn't add the * between the 48/2 and the (, it did that automagically. So every calculator is wrong in the world and a few people that really don't understand the order of operations is right?

post-118098-0-37285300-1303936809.jpg

post-118098-0-92697400-1303936952.jpg

post-118098-0-48718800-1303937053.jpg

The Distributive Property in ALgebra:

The Distributive Property is handy to help you get rid of parentheses.

a(b + c) = ab + ac

To multiply in algebra, you'll use the distributive law:

3x(x+4)

= 3x(x) + 3x(4)

=3x2+12x

i know the order, and so do you. You just arent finishing the operation. which is why u keep coming up with the wrong answer

you have to get rid of the parenthesis... just saying 9+3=12 doesnt get rid of the parenthesis. continuing to simplify gets rid of the parenthesis. hence you have to multiply 12*2

It seems to me like two laws are competing against each other, because according to the order of operations (9+3) should be solved first, NOT 2(9+3), yet according to the distributive property, 2(9+3) should be solved as one symbol, but this goes against the order of operations.

Clearly the distributive property needs to be incorporated into BODMAS/PEMDAS/whatever.

But as it stands.. I stick with 288!

With order of operations multiplication and division are the same then you go from right to left. Thats how you get 288

48/2(12) goes to 24 x 12 = 288

Look up the order of operations OR type this into a calculator and you will get 288

LOL calculators don't really do algebra problems really well.... or all of you would have gotten an a in algebra ;) once you use the distributive property and simplify it.. then u can type it in the calculator for an answer of 2

You can go left to right provided you understand what is happening.

left to right

48/2 = 24 (are you following me so far?)

stop we have parenthesis so we know from standard math procedure we must do that next

9+3 = 12 (are you still following me? we are still doing this left to right nothing really has changed)

so in reality, it is 24(12). What does this mean?

It means we take 24 and multiply it by 12 (not divide), which brings the answer to 288. All this by working left to right and understanding what the parenthesis are.

LOL calculators don't really do algebra problems really well.... or all of you would have gotten an a in algebra ;) once you use the distributive property and simplify it.. then u can type it in the calculator for an answer of 2

I did, got honers actually....scientific calculators do algebra quite well actually (but they don't tell you that in algebra) and at the time I took algebra the cheapest scientific calculator was over $100.

You can go left to right provided you understand what is happening.

left to right

48/2 = 24 (are you following me so far?)

stop we have parenthesis so we know from standard math procedure we must do that next

9+3 = 12 (are you still following me? we are still doing this left to right nothing really has changed)

so in reality, it is 24(12). What does this mean?

It means we take 24 and multiply it by 12 (not divide), which brings the answer to 288. All this by working left to right and understanding what the parenthesis are.

I did, got honers actually....scientific calculators do algebra quite well actually (but they don't tell you that in algebra) and at the time I took algebra the cheapest scientific calculator was over $100.

48/2 is NOT solved before the brackets.

the brackets do not disappear, it doesn't matter if you do the first portion first or second, the brackets do not disappear.

you do left to right unless otherwise instructed. the brackets do not go away.

This is how I read this, and most people in the world do (even the calculators disagree with you that are designed to specifically work with these types of problems).

48?2(9+3)=

48 ? 2 x (9 + 3)=

(48 ? 2) x (9 + 3)=

You solve left to right, with any math problem. the parenthesis do not go away with the 9+3 that is a whole answer. the 48/2 is a whole answer. once you solve the first part 48/2 you can continue on to mulitply it by the 9+3 answer.

You can go left to right provided you understand what is happening.

left to right

48/2 = 24 (are you following me so far?)

stop we have parenthesis so we know from standard math procedure we must do that next

9+3 = 12 (are you still following me? we are still doing this left to right nothing really has changed)

so in reality, it is 24(12). What does this mean?

It means we take 24 and multiply it by 12 (not divide), which brings the answer to 288. All this by working left to right and understanding what the parenthesis are.

I did, got honers actually....scientific calculators do algebra quite well actually (but they don't tell you that in algebra) and at the time I took algebra the cheapest scientific calculator was over $100.

yes im following you. but you can do 48/anything until u get rid of the parethesis using the distributive property

It seems to me like two laws are competing against each other, because according to the order of operations (9+3) should be solved first, NOT 2(9+3), yet according to the distributive property, 2(9+3) should be solved as one symbol, but this goes against the order of operations.

Clearly the distributive property needs to be incorporated into BODMAS/PEMDAS/whatever.

But as it stands.. I stick with 288!

they are not competing with each other. if u solve 9+3 = 12. you still did not get rid of the parenthesis. you have (12) in order to get rid of the parenthesis you have to multiply that 12 by 2. hence the distribution property. 2(9+3) 2*9+2*3

So do you trust a calculator more than a human?

How bout multiple calculators? in the second image I didn't add the * between the 48/2 and the (, it did that automagically. So every calculator is wrong in the world and a few people that really don't understand the order of operations is right?

I trust calculators. you are just doing it wrong. you have to get rid of the parenthesis first. type this into your calculator 2(9+3) get your answer. then do it from left to right

2(9+3) isn't the whole question. You are doing it wrong if you think it is.

The question eventually becomes

24(12)

Type that into your calc. The 2 isn't in brackets encompassing the (9+3) so 2(9+3) is not correct.

It isn't 48/[2(9+3)] then your answer would be correct.

I trust calculators. you are just doing it wrong. you have to get rid of the parenthesis first. type this into your calculator 2(9+3) get your answer. then do it from left to right

There's no argument that 2(9+3) on its' own = 24. The argument is whether the equation should be interpreted as 48/2*(9+3) or 48/(2(9+3))

hehe, its all good. i know im right. their is no need to get personal or anything. i am using order of operations. parenthesis is the first thing u take care of, and they do dissapear. If you dont believe me... thats fine. Do the research.. take it to your math teacher - its all good. but the distributive property is how you multiply in algebra. the distributive property gets rid of the parenthesis, which is the first operation. otherwise, its all good. i enjoyed this topic ;) Have a good night my computer friends... and remember.. its almost time for ubuntu 11.04!!

hehe, its all good. i know im right. their is no need to get personal or anything. i am using order of operations. parenthesis is the first thing u take care of, and they do dissapear. If you dont believe me... thats fine. Do the research.. take it to your math teacher - its all good. but the distributive property is how you multiply in algebra. the distributive property gets rid of the parenthesis, which is the first operation. otherwise, its all good. i enjoyed this topic ;) Have a good night my computer friends... and remember.. its almost time for ubuntu 11.04!!

The brackets do disappear and the equation is still simplified, but not in the order that you suggest.

(9+3) = (12)

48 / 2 = 24

24(12) = 24*12 = 288

The brackets do disappear and the equation is still simplified, but not in the order that you suggest.

(9+3) = (12)

48 / 2 = 24

24(12) = 24*12 = 288

yea thats wrong. (9+3) = (12) the brackets are still there. they have to be gone before u continue. 12 inside the bracets means it is multiplying by something(keep simplyfing) . I know what you are saying, you are just wrong. you are just making up your own rules. I dont think you ever even took algebra before ;) the order i suggest is p first... you know, pemdas

yea thats wrong. (9+3) = (12) the brackets are still there. they have to be gone before u continue. 12 inside the bracets means it is multiplying by something(keep simplyfing) . I know what you are saying, you are just wrong. you are just making up your own rules. I dont think you ever even took algebra before ;) the order i suggest is p first... you know, pemdas

in your way... you never take care of the parentheses. you do it last? how is that right? what order of ops are you using? and yes u have to get rid of the parenthesis, thats what the whole distributive property is all about

ok you guys are right. the distributive property is wrong. when u finally take algebra for the first time... just type all the problems as u see them right into the calculator before putting the equation into correct form.... and watch yourself get an f

http://math.about.com/od/algebra/a/distributive.htm

ok you guys are right. the distributive property is wrong. when u finally take algebra for the first time... just type all the problems as u see them right into the calculator before putting the equation into correct form.... and watch yourself get an f

http://math.about.com/od/algebra/a/distributive.htm

Okay you're right, the order of operations is wrong.. when you finally take basic maths for the first time.. watch yourself get an f.

You see? There are arguments for both sides. The more I think about it the more I think that it's an incorrectly written equation. The distributive property means you need to simplify 2(9+3), BUT, that goes against the order of operations because you are solving a multiplication on the right before you solve a division on the left.

I think it NEEDS to be written as either 48/(2(9+3)) OR 48/2*(9+3), both of which can be solved without ambiguity.

It seems like a contradictory equation.

Interpreting it as 48/2*(9+3) ignores the distributive property.

Interpreting it as 48/(2(9+3)) ignores the order of operations.

Okay you're right, the order of operations is wrong.. when you finally take basic maths for the first time.. watch yourself get an f.

You see? There are arguments for both sides. The more I think about it the more I think that it's an incorrectly written equation. The distributive property means you need to simplify 2(9+3), BUT, that goes against the order of operations because you are solving a multiplication on the right before you solve a division on the left.

I think it NEEDS to be written as either 48/(2(9+3)) OR 48/2*(9+3), both of which can be solved without ambiguity.

It seems like a contradictory equation.

Interpreting it as 48/2*(9+3) ignores the distributive property.

Interpreting it as 48/(2(9+3)) ignores the order of operations.

their is no argument for the other side. the other side is wrong, and the eqation is fine. if the other side was right... the equation would look like this 48/2*12. but its not. its an algebra problem because of the parenthesis which means you use the distributive property. a(b+c) = a*b+a*c. You guys will understand this when you finally take algebra for the first time ;)

their is no argument for the other side. the other side is wrong, and the eqation is fine. if the other side was right... the equation would look like this 48/2*12. but its not. its an algebra problem because of the parenthesis which means you use the distributive property. a(b+c) = a*b+a*c. You guys will understand this when you finally take algebra for the first time ;)

The order of ops exists in algebra too, you don't just forget about it.

The majority of the people here are right and the calcs agree with them. Calcs are based on programming done by people much smarter than all of us. Either the mathematicians that were involved in programming every scientific calculator are wrong or the few that are saying 2 are wrong. My money is on the calcs and my teachings which agree with the calcs as well as the all knowing google.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • When companies do "opt-out" it's because they know that no one will opt-in...
    • the chip might be a binned 5090 so no, youre actually getting the 5090
    • How to set custom folder icons in Windows 11 File Explorer by Usama Jawad Although there are many third-party tools like Windhawk, FlyOOBE, DeskScapes 2026, and more that can be used to customize and tweak Windows 11 according to your preferences, many people often forget that the operating system natively offers a lot of configurability too. One such handy option is available inside File Explorer, where you can set custom folder icons to personalize your experience very quickly. File Explorer is an interface that Windows 11 users leverage rather heavily, so it can get quite boring looking at default icons. It can also be a bit tedious reading the text of each item to navigate to the folder you need. In cases like these, custom folder icons can come in quite handy as they allow you to not only personalize File Explorer, but also offer meaningful aesthetics that can make navigation quicker. Here is how to configure custom folder icons in Windows 11: Download icon files (.ico) from a third-party website of your choice. There are lots of free options online, like Icon Archive. You'll also be able to download them directly from Google Images Open File Explorer Navigate to the folder you want to customize Right-click the folder Select Properties Go to the Customize tab Select Change Icon If you want, you can select a native icon from the Windows directory, but for the purpose of this guide, we'll select the third-party .ico file that we downloaded. As such, select Browse Navigate to the .ico file and double-click it Click Apply, followed by OK That's all there is to it! It shouldn't take more than a minute after downloading the .ico file of your choice. The good news is also that you are not married to the icon you set; you can restore it to the default icon by simply selecting Restore Defaults in the interface mentioned in step 8. It's a very easy way to customize File Explorer, with any changes in this regard being quickly reversible. I would also recommend using View > Extra large icons in File Explorer so that you can properly enjoy the aesthetics. You can also download the entire Object Desktop package. Object Desktop includes programs such as Fences, Start11, Groupy, SoundPackager, DeskScapes and Multiplicity. Disclaimer: Neowin's relationship to Stardock
    • Teams on macOS has a major bug for some users, and Microsoft is rolling out guidance by Usama Jawad Teams is one of the most used online communication and collaboration tools especially in enterprise and school environments. It is available on a variety of platforms including Android, iOS, Windows, macOS, and the web. As such, it is a major problem when users on any of the aforementioned platforms get affected. In its Message Center advisory MC1392559, Microsoft acknowledged a bug impacting Teams customers on certain versions of macOS a few weeks ago. Basically, if affected users start sharing their screen, they'll see a black or blank screen, experience interruptions while sharing, and even face complete failure in screen sharing functionality. This is impacting customers using macOS versions older than Tahoe 26.4, and PCs which are resource-constrained on disk and memory. Interestingly, the scope of this issue appears to be limited as Microsoft has only listed Government Community Cloud (GCC), GCC High, and Department of Defense (DoD) as the affected platforms. Since it can be confusing to customers when the bug appears randomly and troubleshooting methods aren't always obvious, Microsoft is working on introducing some in-product guidance that automatically gets shown to users when a screen sharing failure is detected. They'll be asked to retry sharing their screen and will also be requested to update their macOS version, when applicable. If that is not possible, the Redmond tech giant has urged users to apply a mitigation that involves navigating to Teams Settings > General > Screen sharing > Use Mac OS native sharing. A restart isn't required. Regardless, Microsoft has recommended IT admins to inform their helpdesks about this issue, update their internal documentation, communicate the problem across the organization, and update macOS Tahoe 26.4 devices, where possible. The in-product guidance will begin rolling out later this month and should hopefully be available to all by mid-August.
    • 150.0.4078.65 secret changelog: New feature: Settings > Copilot and AI > Allow Cowork to take actions on your behalf
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      hadiaali45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      arone_24 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      414
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    3. 3
      Nick H.
      89
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!