Recommended Posts

None right now I know of. Sorry... I don't workup much on this.

 

 

Tab Mix Plus has always been my go-to for anything tab related.  Can customize all sorts of things with them.  No idea how well it works with Nightly.. working fine with 29RC though. Looking briefly at their forums reports that the official build is problematic, but there's talk with the dev builds.  Classic Theme Restorer has an option for the close tab buttons too.

 

Thanks for the replies.  I checked up on the bug again, and someone in the comments posted this:

 

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-close-buttons/

 

Restartless, does what it says on the tin (and only that.)  :)  .

Thanks for the replies.  I checked up on the bug again, and someone in the comments posted this:

 

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-close-buttons/

 

Restartless, does what it says on the tin (and only that.)  :)  .

 

Thanks for sharing it for all people.  :)

Australis addons :)

  • Like 3

My Firefox just updated automatically(Strange because its too early lol) and ForecastFox was not working(2.2.2). After looking a little bit you can install 2.2.4(Not yet from Firefox addons page)and that version its working perfectly

 

https://static.getforecastfox.com/downloads/forecastfox-latest.xpi

I find the lack of an inactive tab graphic just doesn't look right on Windows 8. It's actually kind of distracting. And I am using the normal blue color for the theme.

Yeah, it looks really nice with win7 aero, and with osx...but not so much win win8's solid background color. I've been just using the fxchrome theme on windows 8 ;)

i see 29 is out and i must say for me i think it is very ugly. why does it have to copy chrome? i dont want to upgrade if it wont work or look how i would like.

i have a few questions i hope you can answer

 

tabs - i hate tabs and never use then as i use multiple monitors. can you disable tabs? i use an extension to hide tabs if only 1 tab showing as i dont like wasted space.

bookmarks toolbar - i havent seen it in any screenshots with it so is it still there? the toolbar i use has many folders holding many bookmarks. i want easy access to bookmarks.

personas - i love the custom backgrounds personas give you, ive always used my own so i really want to keep using this.

Chrome all the way :P
 

 

I do like what Mozilla have been doing recently, but once you've used one certain browser for many many many hours - its hard to change.

 

The guy who created the Firefox icon lives next door to me, so theres always some geeky jokes flying around our houses ;)

tabs - i hate tabs and never use then as i use multiple monitors. can you disable tabs? i use an extension to hide tabs if only 1 tab showing as i dont like wasted space.

bookmarks toolbar - i havent seen it in any screenshots with it so is it still there? the toolbar i use has many folders holding many bookmarks. i want easy access to bookmarks.

personas - i love the custom backgrounds personas give you, ive always used my own so i really want to keep using this.

Tabs - Yes, your addon probably still works. Using Tab Mix Plus myself, although even with three displays I personally don't use this option myself. On the display page of its configuration is an option to hide the tab bar when there's only one tab open, or hide it always if you're pining for a retro look.

Bookmarks Toolbar - Yup, still there.

Personas - Still there too.

It's really not hard to get it to look and feel like the pre-Australis versions, still stupidly flexible as always, something Chrome can't touch.

How has it copied chrome?

Probably referring to the minimalistic look, they do kinda sorta resemble each other now out of the box. Fortunately easily changed if you don't care for the Chrome look.

1.  Tabs on bottom no longer an option.

2.  Rounded tabs that looks almost identical to Chrome's

3.  Lack of user customization, like Chrome.

 

FF 29 is a disaster.

1. you can still get that with addons or even css scripts if you prefer

2. the tabs in firefox are fully round where the tabs in chrome are angular like minella envelopes. how is that almost identical? what do you expect them to do? make them triangles?

3. there is still plenty of user customization, especially if you install addons. I refer you to this post if you want addons to make firefox look like it was before

 

firefox 29 works just fine. i've been using it for awhile in beta. and i quite like the new theme. the only change i've made with an addon was add the addons bar back for forecastfox

1. you can still get that with addons or even css scripts if you prefer

2. the tabs in firefox are fully round where the tabs in chrome are angular like minella envelopes. how is that almost identical? what do you expect them to do? make them triangles?

3. there is still plenty of user customization, especially if you install addons. I refer you to this post if you want addons to make firefox look like it was before

 

firefox 29 works just fine. i've been using it for awhile in beta. and i quite like the new theme. the only change i've made with an addon was add the addons bar back for forecastfox

 

I can guarantee you that Mozilla will eventually back off of Firefox 29 the same way Microsoft backed off of Windows 8.

1.  Tabs on bottom no longer an option.

2.  Rounded tabs that looks almost identical to Chrome's

3.  Lack of user customization, like Chrome.

 

FF 29 is a disaster.

There's still plenty of user customization, *especially* compared to chrome. Chrome allows absolutely zero toolbar or menu customization. fx 29 allows you to add/remove items from the toolbar, as well as from the new menu. And as always, extensions and themes give many, many more customization options, far more than whats available from other browsers.

 

And I echo the comment above, the new tab strip does *not* look like chrome's, I can't fathom where people are getting this comparison from. if anything the new tab strip looks less like chrome's than the old one.

 

Chrome's tab strip is designed to look like tabs on a manilla envelope, all tabs have the same look, except inactive tabs are slightly transparent. With australis the curved shape is much more pronounced, and not designed with the manilla envelope look in mind, and the inactive tabs look totally different, almost completely blended into the background. They are not 'chrome-like' tabs...

I can guarantee you that Mozilla will eventually back off of Firefox 29 the same way Microsoft backed off of Windows 8.

and i guarantee you they wont. there's no reason too. the only downside of the new theme is the addon bar was removed. everything else is pretty much the same or improved

 

the new settings button has features that the firefox button lacked plus just like before you can still access the classic file menu by pressing alt

 

sync has been improved greatly as well (but you probably don't care about that because it's not actually part of the theme)

 

there are plenty of other things in the back end as well there are being improved but you still don't care because you just don't like how it looks by default now

 

/end rant

  • Like 3

There's still plenty of user customization, *especially* compared to chrome. Chrome allows absolutely zero toolbar or menu customization. fx 29 allows you to add/remove items from the toolbar, as well as from the new menu. And as always, extensions and themes give many, many more customization options, far more than whats available from other browsers.

 

And I echo the comment above, the new tab strip does *not* look like chrome's, I can't fathom where people are getting this comparison from. if anything the new tab strip looks less like chrome's than the old one.

 

They see a rounded tab, and their mind is set.  That's how it is for almost everything.  :/  .

and i guarantee you they wont. there's no reason too. the only downside of the new theme is the addon bar was removed. everything else is pretty much the same or improved

 

the new settings button has features that the firefox button lacked plus just like before you can still access the classic file menu by pressing alt

 

sync has been improved greatly as well (but you probably don't care about that because it's not actually part of the theme)

 

there are plenty of other things in the back end as well there are being improved but you still don't care because you just don't like how it looks by default now

 

/end rant

 

I just screen capped this post.  So when Mozilla does back off all this nonsense, I can rub it in your arrogant face.  Same way I did to Dot Matrix with his "Start Menu is never coming back to Windows 8" nonsense.

I just screen capped this post.  So when Mozilla does back off all this nonsense, I can rub it in your arrogant face.  Same way I did to Dot Matrix with his "Start Menu is never coming back to Windows 8" nonsense.

with the start screen i can understand. it takes up the entire screen and has a few features from the menu missing. neither is the case with the new theme or settings button.

 

the way it seems to me is you're calling the new theme crap just because you cant have the tabs on the bottom anymore. you're blowing things way out of proportion and refusing to look at everything else

My main concern about copying Chrome was the menu button, as I liked the Firefox button, but they actually did their own thing, and even the placement makes more sense with the way it works now (the menu pretty much just offers more buttons along the ones on the toolbar, so it makes sense it's placed right next to them). Keeps all the extension buttons tidy if you don't like them taking up space on the toolbar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!