Recommended Posts

Fail? WebGL and WebM aren't going anywhere.

Neither is really used anywhere, and if it is it is opt-in.

Neither technology is impressive, quite on the contrary actually.

Both technologies have competition which offers more impressive closed source alternatives.

Tab detach animation is backout from Nightly as well. I liked it and enjoyed it but it was making performance hit too much. So good move. But hoping new implemention does not take 3 years.

Neither is really used anywhere, and if it is it is opt-in.

Neither technology is impressive, quite on the contrary actually.

Both technologies have competition which offers more impressive closed source alternatives.

I wonder how much time Mozilla wasted on this?

Neither is really used anywhere, and if it is it is opt-in.

Neither technology is impressive, quite on the contrary actually.

Both technologies have competition which offers more impressive closed source alternatives.

Your first point doesn't make much sense (You opt into using it, by using it?)

Second point is a personal thing (I think OpenGL in the browser is quite impressive)

And the Flash Stage3D stuff (I assume that's what you're talking about), Adobe themselves have said that's based off what WebGL offers.

Then either file a bug report or start using Chrome. Preferably the former. :)

Problem is that very few of us in this thread are registered and have the time start a bug report, yet alone follow up on it. Hope someone else can file the bug report though.

Problem is that very few of us in this thread are registered and have the time start a bug report, yet alone follow up on it. Hope someone else can file the bug report though.

what will all that take? a whole 5 minutes?

no offense but it just sounds like you're being lazy, if you want the feature so badly file a bug report

personally I like the way they're going with the new dropdown download button, and for those who prefer it, they can get the downloadstatusbar add-on

I'm having that issue I mentioned before with the extension Tab Utilities. There's a feature called Tab Stacking, that all of a sudden turned itself back on! The smooth moving animation when moving tabs is no longer there, and now it auto stacks tabs when moving them. I went to about:config and searched for the entry, but it's still set to false. That means it shouldn't be on, but yet it is. extensions.tabutils.autoCollapseNewStack is set to false. I don't know what's going on, cause this just all of a sudden started happening. Maybe a new version came out and auto installed itself? I know I heard that they took out the smooth animated tabs, but is that for the latest Firefox 8.0 Beta 5 also?

I'm having that issue I mentioned before with the extension Tab Utilities. There's a feature called Tab Stacking, that all of a sudden turned itself back on! The smooth moving animation when moving tabs is no longer there, and now it auto stacks tabs when moving them. I went to about:config and searched for the entry, but it's still set to false. That means it shouldn't be on, but yet it is. extensions.tabutils.autoCollapseNewStack is set to false. I don't know what's going on, cause this just all of a sudden started happening. Maybe a new version came out and auto installed itself? I know I heard that they took out the smooth animated tabs, but is that for the latest Firefox 8.0 Beta 5 also?

I use Tab Mix Plus Dev release and it works great. You can find it HERE

I use Tab Mix Plus Dev release and it works great. You can find it HERE

Yeah, I might have to go back to using that if I can't get used to this Tab Stacking thing. I think it's because they took out the smooth animated moving tabs in Firefox 8.0 Beta 5. They were in Beta 4. Can anyone confirm? Kind of snuck up on me. I heard they were removing it for the Nightly releases, but I wasn't sure it was going to be removed in the latest beta.

I'm pretty annoyed that they backed out the tab animations even on the dev builds.

Me too. I don't get why they would do it on the beta builds or nightly releases. Experimental features should be in them! That's what makes them experimental releases! Take it out of the released stable version if you must, but let us people that want to experiment continue to do so. That's pretty lame to have a cool and useful feature, then just take it away. I understand they are working on bringing it back better than ever, so I will try and show some patience. It is a free browser, so I can't complain much. Unless it's my imagination, it does seem to be a little snappier when closing tabs now. I'm guessing that's because they removed the animation. I hope they can make it like Chrome's someday. I really don't understand why they can't just leave the feature in, but have an option to enable or disable it. The best of both worlds.

I'm pretty annoyed that they backed out the tab animations even on the dev builds.

yeah just updated and noticed the tab animation is gone! why???? it's back to the older look.

I never had problems with the tab animation thing... sometimes CPU was high for like 4 days and that issue was resolved! it only uses like .5-2% more CPU usage.... if this was all people griped about than that sucks becuase it was smoother to move tabs around. it was much easier. I don't care about the extra 1 or 2% CPU usage it had if it makes it smoother it's worth it for a better experience. my page fault delta didn't even change much with the tab animations.

@remixedcat

Neither in terms of CPU-usage nor the animation itself were smoth enough... Despite the fact that it broke Add-ons.

If you want to see how tab-animation is to be smooth, check Chrome. They will re-implement it with another way. None knows when, though.

@remixedcat

Neither in terms of CPU-usage nor the animation itself were smoth... Despite the fact that it broke Add-ons.

If you want to see how tab-animation is to be smooth, check Chrome. They will re-implement it with another way. None knows when, though.

It was perfectly smooth on all my machines, even my old pentium 4 box.

So I installed the PDF.js extension but whenever I load a pdf it still uses the Adobe plug-in and when I disable that it doesn't load at all. How can I make PDF.js the default PDF handler?

Also, does anyone know a simple way of removing plug-ins? I installed BitComet ages ago to check something and have since uninstalled it, but the plugin BitCometAgent is still in firefox's plug-ins? There is only an option to disable it, none to remove.

So I installed the PDF.js extension but whenever I load a pdf it still uses the Adobe plug-in and when I disable that it doesn't load at all. How can I make PDF.js the default PDF handler?

I simply installed the extension and disable my previous plugin and it worked, so i don't know :/

I'm pretty annoyed that they backed out the tab animations even on the dev builds.

I'm guessing that one of the reasons they removed the tab animations is that people usually drag their tabs into their bookmark button and that didn't work at all with the tab animations enabled (you could not bookmark a site when dragging the tab).

I simply installed the extension and disable my previous plugin and it worked, so i don't know :/

It's working now. I'm not sure why the toolbar buttons have to be so big, I assume that they're just placeholders for the moment. Also, it would be good if they added the hand icon so that I could drag the pdf around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!