Recommended Posts

sarcastic?

Anyways , if you do not know what the devs are busy with , please don't assume anything just like that please... They have this IonMonkey base ready and up on arewefastyet , incrementalGC in progress , Profile clean up , and VARIOUS snappy and memshrink projects worked on and landing to nightly... What i have told is just about performance , rest UI related stuff is also fixed now and then (inline autocomplete , new tab page , download manager)

New Tab Page is landing again for tomorrow's nightly , lets see...

They lost many times to create this new tab page, instead they should have followed the mockup imo.

should be coming soon, there are a list of things that need to be done for it to be more native.

1. Page bounce when scrolling

2. Lion scrollbars

3. page forward and back animation

These are just a few above the surface elements as there are things that still need to be done below to increase performance on OS X.

Yet another Smooth Scrolling adds the page bounce! They can easily build this into Fx

They lost many times to create this new tab page, instead they should have followed the mockup imo.

I don't care for the one in the mockups. It's too busy and full of information I don't care to see. Not everyone wants a visual overload like that. So I don't think they've lost anything.

I don't care for the one in the mockups. It's too busy and full of information I don't care to see. Not everyone wants a visual overload like that. So I don't think they've lost anything.

You are obviously confusing the new tab page and the home tab, which means that you didn't took more than few sec to read the full article.

So, is there (or are they eventually going to implement) a way to pin bookmarks to the new tab page instead of your history (top sites)? If not, it's pretty useless for me in its current state.

Yeah, thats my current criticism with chrome's new tab page too. Opera's had it right for ages with speeddial, which is super customizable. Why do all the other browsers insist on not letting you customize that page at all?

Firefox 10 is amazing!! They FINALLY fixed the responsiveness! I am noticing a significant difference in the way pages scroll. It's smooth now without jerking (using one of the great smooth scrolling extensions, SmoothWheel, or Yet Another Smooth Scrolling) and switching tabs feels so fast and smooth, even when I have a lot of tabs open. They need to work on two major things now: re-adding the smooth sliding animation when moving tabs, and making the browser not stutter and slowdown when starting or finishing a download. That happens sometimes. Those are the major hurdles I hope they fix soon. I'd also like multi-row tabs and multi-row bookmark toolbars without having to use user styles or extensions. The upcoming speed dial like feature built in will be a welcome addition as well. They are definitely heading in the right direction.

The slowdown when downloading a file is due to your virus scanner (or malware scanner, etc.), you can disable that in about:config (If your AV is any good then it'll still scan the file)

Yeah, I remember someone telling me that before. I forgot what I have to change or add. I'm using Security Essentials. Is that good enough for it to still scan?

Yeah, I remember someone telling me that before. I forgot what I have to change or add. I'm using Security Essentials. Is that good enough for it to still scan?

Can't answer your last question, however I'm running MSE and just disabled the post-download scan by:

1. Typing about:config in the address bar

2. Searching for 'browser.download.manager.scanWhenDone' and setting it to false

If you're worried about your AV not picking it up after changing that setting, try the EICAR test file.

http://www.eicar.org/86-0-Intended-use.html

I remember when MSE first came out it was pretty bad at detecting that (letting you download it and open it), hopefully it's gotten better (or it could simply be that they don't scan for that on purpose)

https://wiki.mozilla...ning/2012-02-01

:D

UX & User Research

  • Australis project has feature pages, is getting staffed:

    [*]Basic research on Translation feature done, designs coming soon

    [*]Metro UI (Win 8) design work in progress

    [*]URL Autocomplete landed!

    [*]New download manager about to land (and/or has landed), still some known issues

    [*]New tab refinements continuing, landed on Nightly (preffed off)

    [*]Home tab in UX branch has launch targets for Bookmarks/History/Downloads, and Apps in the future

I don't know if its true but it seems like they want firefox to look like chrome clone

australis-tabs.png

Rounded tabs =/= Chrome clone, since that's about the only thing similar in that screenshot.

Chrome does not entirely fade out background tabs, does not have vertical bar separators, does not have a 'new tab' button in that style. But I guess having rounded tabs makes it a copy, as opposed to just being a pleasant design paradigm that Chrome uses. Never mind that tabs come in all shapes and sizes in the real world.

Rounded tabs =/= Chrome clone, since that's about the only thing similar in that screenshot.

Chrome does not entirely fade out background tabs, does not have vertical bar separators, does not have a 'new tab' button in that style. But I guess having rounded tabs makes it a copy, as opposed to just being a pleasant design paradigm that Chrome uses. Never mind that tabs come in all shapes and sizes in the real world.

If tabs on top created an image that all browsers (FF , opera and now ie) are copying chrome , i bet rounded tabs will definitely activate numerous rants and trolls...

Are tabs on top for Mac ever going to be implemented? I looked at the filed bug and it looks like no one is working on it... :(

For those mockups are they still planning rounded tabs? Those look awful and I saw some images on Stephan's blog where they werent like that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!