Recommended Posts

The tabs in that mockup are ugly as hell. Square tabs please. I don't mind chrome's rounded tabs, but for some reason the ones in that mockup just look horrible.

I think they're too big or too curved. The original Firefox 4 mockups had rounded tabs, but with a much smaller radius, and they were much nicer IMO.

Edit: Firefox already has tabs on top on OS X, tabs in the titlebar however are blocked on technical issues (Making the OpenGL layer extend into the titlebar, which is also required to make the rounded corners nicer, and both require vsync to be enabled)

I think they're too big or too curved. The original Firefox 4 mockups had rounded tabs, but with a much smaller radius, and they were much nicer IMO.

Edit: Firefox already has tabs on top on OS X, tabs in the titlebar however are blocked on technical issues (Making the OpenGL layer extend into the titlebar, which is also required to make the rounded corners nicer, and both require vsync to be enabled)

Prefer rectangular bold outlined tabs as well. The eye is just designed to recognize straight lines better than curvy ones, which is why from the mockup itself, I get a headache.

The update to nightly version 13 broke some extensions. I have the Add-on Compatibility Reporter but it doesn't work for everything. Is there any other way around this?

Try https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/checkcompatibility/

I had a theme installed along with Add-on Compatibility Reporter which didn't work, installed this add-on and everything was fine. May or may not work for you though.

The smooth scrooling added in the latest Nightly builds rocks!!

Can you upload a vid showing it? How does it compare to the SmoothWheel/Yet Another Smooth Scrolling extensions? Also, the new download manager/new tab page is in there, right? Just not the home tab page.

Can you upload a vid showing it? How does it compare to the SmoothWheel/Yet Another Smooth Scrolling extensions? Also, the new download manager/new tab page is in there, right? Just not the home tab page.

Sorry i did not make the comparison but to me its really snappy :) Why don't you install Aurora build and if you don't like it you can just disable it

The eye is just designed to recognize straight lines better than curvy ones, which is why from the mockup itself, I get a headache.

Slightly offtopic: I've not heard this before - have you got a link about that? (I'm not sure how it makes evolutionary sense)

Sorry i did not make the comparison but to me its really snappy :) Why don't you install Aurora build and if you don't like it you can just disable it

It looks good. I might have to install either Aurora or Nightly. Where is the link to download Aurora 12, or Nightly 13? I don't see it on https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/ That site never updates as fast as the main Mozilla site. Is the new URL autocomplete in both versions? Thanks!

Slightly offtopic: I've not heard this before - have you got a link about that? (I'm not sure how it makes evolutionary sense)

Can't seem to find the textbook where I've read this before, but I believe this was likely in my physiology class. I will say there are a number of indirect studies similar to this, especially in cases of various eye disorders like macular degeneration, where straight lines become distorted, which tends to highlight the importance of straight line recognition in our daily vision.

If you require a simple experiment, have someone draw random two closed shapes, one with only straight lines and another with curved lines. Then look at the shapes side by side at the same time and see which one you are able to fully recognize faster. Chances are you will be drawn to and be able to make out the full dimensions and attributes of the straight lined shape a couple of milliseconds faster than you will with the curved lined shaped because curved lines require addition processing and perception to define its features.

While you may be right in that curved lines are probably as evolutionarily significant as straights lines for vision, there are indeed differences in our we perceive the two, which can vary between individuals as well.

It looks good. I might have to install either Aurora or Nightly. Where is the link to download Aurora 12, or Nightly 13? I don't see it on https://www.mozilla....irefox/channel/ That site never updates as fast as the main Mozilla site. Is the new URL autocomplete in both versions? Thanks!

right now their just on the ftp, they haven't been pushed to the main site or the updater yet

Worthwhile installing the 64bit versions of nightly, or just stick with 32bit?

Only on Linux or OS X, Windows ones are primarily for developers (To be fair, all Nightly builds are, but the 64bit Windows builds even more so). They're buggy, slower, etc. The main differences is that some things don't work properly, you have less plugins and there's no "* 32" in the task manager.

Anyone know how to get the extension ChromaTabs Plus 3.0.0b1 working with the latest version of TabGroups Manager? It works somewhat, but there's an annoying bug that is a deal breaker. Sometimes when you create new tabs, it won't let you close your old tabs and create new ones. Some kind of conflict there. I hope the creator of TabGroups Manager updates his extension to fix this.

https://wiki.mozilla...ning/2012-02-01

:D

I don't know if its true but it seems like they want firefox to look like chrome clone

australis-tabs.png

Is the majority actually agreeing with these mockups? I think they look terrible, and it may not be a good idea to have unactive "tabs" without borders. Seems to be distracting and harder to read. I hope these are changed, as these are awful. =\

Is the majority actually agreeing with these mockups? I think they look terrible, and it may not be a good idea to have unactive "tabs" without borders. Seems to be distracting and harder to read. I hope these are changed, as these are awful. =\

Me : R we rly going 4 curvy tabs ? Dont U think it will jst make us look mre lk chrome ? trunc.it/j9sgz

paulrouget : yes we are.

Me : I know my opinion is of no importance but as a loyal firefox user and beta tester , i think its not right move :|

paulrouget : we need to make Firefox much prettier. We got ton of feedback on Australis, and we're pretty confident it's the right move even if we get some "you're just copying Chrome"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!