Recommended Posts

That is only your opinion, for me the new download manager is A LOT much better than that horrible add-on. :)

I gave arguments, you gave none. So excuse me for not trusting you.

Sir please, its not the final version , if you have suggestions , post somewhere where you would be heard by "developers" (Bugzilla).

Did they ever listened to somebody? Every constructive comments on bugzilla appears to be ignored.

See this one for example : https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645313

Are the animated tabs like moving tabs ever coming back? Feels so outdated having to use the "arrow" move still on Firefox. Haven't seen anything about this in awhile and lost the bug tracker.

Thanks!

I've been wondering about that, too. I wish they would hurry up and fix it and release it in Firefox 12/13! In the meantime, you can use this extension. Only problem is, it doesn't work with TabGroups Manager, which makes it a dealbreaker for me. It's hard to stop using that great extension. You can use TabGroups Menu or TabGroup Switcher for a somewhat similar effect, though.

Animated Tabs (Does NOT work with TabGroups Manager)-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/animated-tabs/

TabGroups Menu-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tabgroups-menu/?src=search

Tab Group Switcher-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tab-group-switcher/?src=search

If anyone knows of a way for animated tabs to work with TabGroups Manager, let me know. Thanks!

Download Statusbar is much better than the new video downloader. You can see all your current DL at a glance and you don't have to click 2 times to open a downloaded file.

WTF are doing the guys at Mozilla? There have really no clue about what they are doing or what?

Remember that the devs are not designing for you, they are designing for everyone. Download Statusbar is way too complex and jarring for most people (note: I use that addon, though in a mode that makes it more like the new UI). Most people don't download a lot at once, for example.

Did they ever listened to somebody? Every constructive comments on bugzilla appears to be ignored.

See this one for example : https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=645313

Bugzilla is not really intended as a general discussion platform - it's a tracker system. Mozilla uses generally uses public mailing lists for that, plus http://forums.mozillazine.org is a good place (it's not internal, but it is visited).

Remember that the devs are not designing for you, they are designing for everyone. Download Statusbar is way too complex and jarring for most people (note: I use that addon, though in a mode that makes it more like the new UI). Most people don't download a lot at once, for example.

How is it too complex? It looks as simple as what Chrome offers by default.

Bugzilla is not really intended as a general discussion platform - it's a tracker system. Mozilla uses generally uses public mailing lists for that, plus http://forums.mozillazine.org is a good place (it's not internal, but it is visited).

I know, I part of the Mozilla fundation, but the guy was pointing me out to bugzilla, nonsense.

How is it too complex? It looks as simple as what Chrome offers by default.

It can go both ways. The Chrome bar takes up a bit of space on smaller screens, so why not just make it button on the top right, where someone that wants to know about their download they can find out by clicking on it. Then click anywhere on screen to close it.

Much simpler + nicer.

Is anyone else bothered by the way the Back Button looks when there is no site to go back to? Looks odd with the entire button faded out the way it is. Think it's the border and the way it blends.

Smooth Scrolling on Nightly etc. seems to annoy me greatly. Not sure if everyone else prefers smooth scrolling or not. To me it just gives me headaches. I know it can be turned off, but seems odd to have it on by default.

Private Browsing mode looks interesting:

australis-pbm.png

How do we get ours to look like that? If a theme isn't available, how do I at least get the yellow bookmarks star? Assuming it opens a dropdown menu with my bookmarks. That's what I want, or is that just the bookmark this page icon that's normally in the url bar? I want something like this extension, but that is compatible with the Add Bookmark Here extension. This one doesn't appear to be compatible. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bookmarks-menu/?src=ss

It's apparently not compatible with firefox 10 either? Try dragging a tab away to create a new window.

Maybe not fully compatible, but it worked last time I tried it when I disabled TabGroups Manager. It wasn't perfect, but it sort of worked. I'll be happy when they finally add it back to Firefox and it works with TabGroups Manager. Hopefully in Firefox 13 or soon after.

UX Builds now have the new Download Manager http://ftp.mozilla.o...uilds/ux-win32/

Here is a video preview

One thing I noticed with the new Download Manager would be to have the "show all downloads" on a seperate tab instead of a pop-up box. Are they going to be implementing the tab navigation anytime soon? Popup boxes need to go soon.

One thing I noticed with the new Download Manager would be to have the "show all downloads" on a seperate tab instead of a pop-up box. Are they going to be implementing the tab navigation anytime soon? Popup boxes need to go soon.

Is there an easy way to clear downloads from the list? There needs to be a clear all button, or a little trash can icon next to each download, so u can delete them from the list.

Is there an easy way to clear downloads from the list? There needs to be a clear all button, or a little trash can icon next to each download, so u can delete them from the list.

You have to right click on a file. You have two options then. "Remove from list" or "Clear list".

Bugzilla is not really intended as a general discussion platform - it's a tracker system. Mozilla uses generally uses public mailing lists for that, plus http://forums.mozillazine.org is a good place (it's not internal, but it is visited).

Mozillazine is not by/for mozilla.

One thing I noticed with the new Download Manager would be to have the "show all downloads" on a seperate tab instead of a pop-up box. Are they going to be implementing the tab navigation anytime soon? Popup boxes need to go soon.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697359

You have to right click on a file. You have two options then. "Remove from list" or "Clear list".

That's not bad, but I'd like an option right on the Download Manager. Left clicking is easier, but it's not a big deal. The Download Manager looks promising to me. This new UX build with the Download Manager doesn't conflict with Status-4-Evar, Download Statusbar, or Download Manager Tweak? That's good if it doesn't.

It can go both ways. The Chrome bar takes up a bit of space on smaller screens, so why not just make it button on the top right, where someone that wants to know about their download they can find out by clicking on it. Then click anywhere on screen to close it.

Much simpler + nicer.

So what? With download statusbar the space used isn't as big as it is in Chrome.

People who want to know about their DL have the nice coloured effect on the taskbar on Windows 7. Also, download statusbar shows the progress per download instead of on global time for all DL (which is confusing).

Finally, as said before, it reduces the number of click to open a complete DL.

So "much simpler + nicer"? Nope.

One thing I noticed with the new Download Manager would be to have the "show all downloads" on a seperate tab instead of a pop-up box. Are they going to be implementing the tab navigation anytime soon? Popup boxes need to go soon.

"Download manager tweak" allows you to have DL in tab.

Mozillazine is not by/for mozilla.

I didn't say it was 'by' mozilla. I said it's not internal, but it is visited (by mozilla people). It's certainly 'for' mozilla, though.

In any case, I believe my point stands: bugzilla is not a general discussion platform - it's a tracker. Report bugs, give direct, specific feedback - but don't fill it with opinions.

People who want to know about their DL have the nice coloured effect on the taskbar on Windows 7. Also, download statusbar shows the progress per download instead of on global time for all DL (which is confusing).

Finally, as said before, it reduces the number of click to open a complete DL.

Don't forget those who don't have Win7, which is a huge number of people (again, part of the 'design for everyone' concept). Like I said, most people aren't downloading a lot of items - splitting up downloads is a bit over the top for most (plus, the Win7 taskbar effect wouldn't help there anyway).

Number of clicks to open a complete download: yes, putting it right in front of the user does reduce it by one. However, putting it right in front of the user is pointless until the download has actually finished. Plus, if they don't want to deal with it immediately, it's just an annoying waste of screen space. Only very common screen actions need be a single click away, and I don't think running a download is one of them.

Please stop fighting over whether certain addon is better or not , it boils down to personal opinion :|

I wouldn't class this as 'fighting'? It's a completely valid discussion about a major new feature - the upcoming built-in download manager. I wouldn't class it as just down to personal opinion, either - UX choices have more to them than just subjective opinions. (And I think AnthonyD has some interesting points, even if I don't ultimately agree with them)

Don't forget those who don't have Win7, which is a huge number of people (again, part of the 'design for everyone' concept). Like I said, most people aren't downloading a lot of items - splitting up downloads is a bit over the top for most (plus, the Win7 taskbar effect wouldn't help there anyway).

Number of clicks to open a complete download: yes, putting it right in front of the user does reduce it by one. However, putting it right in front of the user is pointless until the download has actually finished. Plus, if they don't want to deal with it immediately, it's just an annoying waste of screen space. Only very common screen actions need be a single click away, and I don't think running a download is one of them.

Why would you assume most people only download one file at a time? Are they still using dialup? With services like google docs and dropbox, it common that people do indeed download multiple files at the same time. Also, it should be noted that Chrome splits up the downloads in its download bar and it's the most popular browser, so I think people are handling it just fine.

Putting the download time and speed is not pointless. I've lost count of how many times I would be waiting for a download to finish and start doing something else that is bandwidth consuming (e.g. watch youtube), prolonging the time for the file to finish. DL Statusbar solves that problem and makes me aware of my activities by providing details of all the pending files. If someone does not want the download bar to show up during the downloading itself, they can just implement a simple option to "hide until complete."

My point is mozilla shouldn't be putting in a half-baked feature that is just as useless as the current download popup menu. People love to argue the "what if someone doesn't want it like that." The solution is always to just add an on/off switch. This does not only apply to firefox, but other programs as well. With that said, they need to implement the dl statusbar into firefox and offer options to control it's behavior to the user's liking.

Please stop fighting over whether certain addon is better or not , it boils down to personal opinion :|

Be kind to notice that we are not talking necessarily about addons, rather the implementation of the new download manager versus having a download bar similar to the download statusbar addon, which is entirely a relevant argument.

Why would you assume most people only download one file at a time? Are they still using dialup? With services like google docs and dropbox, it common that people do indeed download multiple files at the same time. Also, it should be noted that Chrome splits up the downloads in its download bar and it's the most popular browser, so I think people are handling it just fine.

I'm not saying people don't sometimes download more than one file, I just think it's likely that most people aren't downloading multiple files at once most of the time - which makes it the better case to primarily design for. It should obviously still be able to cope with multiple at once.

Putting the download time and speed is not pointless. I've lost count of how many times I would be waiting for a download to finish and start doing something else that is bandwidth consuming (e.g. watch youtube), prolonging the time for the file to finish. DL Statusbar solves that problem and makes me aware of my activities by providing details of all the pending files. If someone does not want the download bar to show up during the downloading itself, they can just implement a simple option to "hide until complete."

The new UI has the download time on it. The speed in kb/s is something only advanced users care about - everyone else just wants to know when it's done. (I do personally care a bit about that info, but that's cause I'm a techie)

My point is mozilla shouldn't be putting in a half-baked feature that is just as useless as the current download popup menu. People love to argue the "what if someone doesn't want it like that." The solution is always to just add an on/off switch. This does not only apply to firefox, but other programs as well. With that said, they need to implement the dl statusbar into firefox and offer options to control it's behavior to the user's liking.

Note, it's not finished yet, and won't be until it's actually live in people's hands. It will have an on/off switch, in that it can still be replaced by an addon. Otherwise, what would the on/off switch be? If it means keeping the current UI - that's not what you (or I) want either.

(Btw, just want to note, I am not implying the current version is perfect.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Kdenlive 26.04.2 by Razvan Serea Kdenlive is an acronym for KDE Non-Linear Video Editor. It works on GNU/Linux, Windows and BSD. Through the MLT framework, Kdenlive integrates many plugin effects for video and sound processing or creation. Furthermore Kdenlive brings a powerful titling tool, a DVD authoring (menus) solution, and can then be used as a complete studio for video creation. Kdenlive supports all of the formats supported by FFmpeg or libav (such as QuickTime, AVI, WMV, MPEG, and Flash Video, among others), and also supports 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratios for both PAL, NTSC and various HD standards, including HDV and AVCHD. Video can also be exported to DV devices, or written to a DVD with chapters and a simple menu. Video editing features: Multi-track editing with a timeline and supports an unlimited number of video and audio tracks. A built-in title editor and tools to create, move, crop and delete video clips, audio clips, text clips and image clips. Ability to add custom effects and transitions. A wide range of effects and transitions. Audio signal processing capabilities include normalization, phase and pitch shifting, limiting, volume adjustment, reverb and equalization filters as well as others. Visual effects include options for masking, blue-screen, distortions, rotations, colour tools, blurring, obscuring and others. Configurable keyboard shortcuts and interface layouts. Rendering is done using a separate non-blocking process so it can be stopped, paused and restarted. Kdenlive also provides a script called the Kdenlive Builder Wizard (KBW) that compiles the latest developer version of the software and its main dependencies from source, to allow users to try to test new features and report problems on the bug tracker. Project files are stored in XML format. An archiving feature allows exporting a project among all assets into a single folder or compressed archive. Built-in audio mixer Kdenlive 26.04.2 changelog: Remove not needed actions from render info, fix rough size calculation for rendering. Fix clip sometimes not inserted in timeline when moving vertically in bin drag. Fix transcoding from clip properties. Cleanup render profile audio quality. Use percent based value for audio quality, and adjust the range accordingly per codec. Fixes bug #520750 Enforce even numbers for render width/height. Fixes bug #520737 Fix nightly flatpak - disable rnnoise until implemented. Fix missing initialization. Edit mediacapture.cpp. Fix document unnecessarily marked as modified on opening, triggering a backup request. Fix incorrect detection of missing and remote clips causing unwanted backups. Fixes issue #2194 Fix tests. Fix tmp files copied to wrong location when setting project folder. Fixes bug #467740 Fix color clips not selected on creation. Use QFileInfo instead of QUrl/QDir to try fixing Windows shared drives. Fixes bug #451413 Fix timeline preview incorrectly invalidated when a track with effect duration changed. Fixes bug #514541 Fix missing var. Display paths in native format in render widget. Fixes bug #520428 Simple splash: fix pressing return always triggered the same button. Minor update to simple splash. Fix unwanted clips added to timeline and cleanup. Fixes issue #2190 Minor layout improvements to welcome screen, add Quit and Open shortcuts. Fix broken welcome dialog layout in tiling compositors. (craft) Limit the number of CPU cores used during a Windows build with mingw as some .cpp files are memory intensive to build. (kde-ci) Limit the number of CPU cores used during a build as some .cpp files are memory intensive to build. (kde-ci) Cleanup old entries. Another fix for animation crash. Fix uninitialized function - crash on create animation. Another attempt to fix MacOS permissions. MacOS: fix bundle release version. Fix MacOS plist path. Fix MacOS build. Explicitely link against Qt::Core. Download: Kdenlive 26.04.2 | 128.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Standalone Executable View: Kdenlive Home page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Here's how to watch the Xbox Games Showcase today and what to expect by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The June games showcase week has been a packed one, with everything from major presentations like Sony and Summer Game Fest to indie-focused reveals coming in almost every day. Now, it's almost time for another big one, with Microsoft bringing its Xbox Games Showcase back later today. This is a double feature too, with a Gears of War E-Day deep dive also being attached to it. For anyone wanting to tune in online, the 2026 Xbox Games Showcase is kicking off at 10 AM PT | 1 PM ET | 6 PM BST | 7 PM CEST later today, June 7. The event will be available to watch on the official Xbox YouTube (4K 60FPS), Twitch, Facebook, Steam, Amazon Live, and other portals. Separate livestreams for American Sign Language and Audio Description will also be available. "This year marks 25 years of XBOX, and this Showcase is poised to be a true celebration, offering world premieres, new gameplay, fresh updates, and more for a swathe of projects we cannot wait to share," said Microsoft about this presentation. With a new CEO behind it that is pulling off some interesting moves, Xbox may have some surprises to reveal today. New looks at first-party games like Halo Campaign Evolved from Halo studios, Fable from Playground Games, InXile Entertainment's Clockwork Revolution, Mojang's Minecraft Dungeons II, and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 from Infinity Ward are to be expected here. We may finally get to see the new Blade from Arcane Studios in action and a new Persona game from Atlus at the showcase too. Surprise announcements may also arrive from other Microsoft-owned studios like Bethesda, MachineGames, Ninja Theory, Obsidian, Rare, World's Edge, or Blizzard. Considering how every new release nowadays is staying away from November and December to avoid Grand Theft Auto VI's release, any launch dates Microsoft announces will probably skip those months as well. Once the Xbox Games Showcase ends, Microsoft will immediately kick off the Gears of War: E-Day Direct. This deep dive into the upcoming prequel from The Coalition should attach gameplay footage and perhaps a release window to the highly anticipated project.
    • People in the '50s and '60s had the same attitude, and we're still here over a half century later.
    • So after some fiddling I was able to get it to run at a pretty stable 30FPS. I'm slightly surprised about how much fiddling I had to do to get there though given what I thought was reasonable hardware: Processors: 16 × AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics Memory: 16 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor 1: AMD Radeon 780M Graphics Graphics Processor 2: AMD Radeon RX 7700S I think I could do it better if I use Linux rather than Windows, Windows RAM usage is stupid without stripping the system down. But once I got it working in a reasonable state, it was so awesome! I felt like a new Bond! If anyone has any advice to get things going a bit smoother FPS-wise, I'd appreciate it.
    • Something is rotten in the state of Denmark Australia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      256
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!